Stop or go decisions at the onset of yellow light in a connected environment: A hybrid approach of decision tree and panel mixed logit model

Abstract Driver decisions at the onset of yellow traffic lights are often critical, as inaccurate decisions may result in traffic conflicts and collisions. A future connected environment where vehicles can communicate with traffic lights is expected to minimize the uncertainty associated with a driver’s decision-making at signalized intersections by providing advance information related to traffic light changes. The effectiveness of such a connected environment, however, remains unexplored due to the paucity of relevant data. This study examines driver decisions at the onset of yellow traffic lights when they are assisted with advance information about traffic light changes. Seventy-eight participants with diverse backgrounds performed driving experiments on an urban route with a signalized intersection simulated in the CARRS-Q Advanced Driving Simulator. The experiment consisted of two randomized driving conditions: baseline (without advance information aids) and connected environment (with advance information aids). Contrary to the existing literature, this study employs a hybrid approach, leveraging the combined benefits of data mining to identify a priori relationships and a panel mixed logit model (more specifically, correlated grouped random parameters logit with heterogeneity-in-means approach) to account for unobserved heterogeneity as well as the correlation among random parameters. Our analysis shows that drivers in the connected environment are less likely to proceed through intersections at the onset of yellow light compared to the baseline condition. However, at the individual driver-level, the connected environment’s impact on driver decisions is mixed. Female drivers have been found to have a higher propensity for yellow light running in the connected environment than that of male drivers. Overall, the connected environment assists drivers in making safer decisions at the onset of yellow light.

[1]  Panagiotis Ch. Anastasopoulos,et al.  A random thresholds random parameters hierarchical ordered probit analysis of highway accident injury-severities , 2017 .

[2]  Ashish Bhaskar,et al.  Estimating and Comparing Response Times in Traditional and Connected Environments , 2019, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[3]  U Tränkle,et al.  Risk perception and age-specific accidents of young drivers. , 1990, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Cj Baguley 'Running the red' at signals on high-speed roads , 1988 .

[5]  Eun-Ha Choi,et al.  Crash Factors in Intersection-Related Crashes: An On-Scene Perspective , 2010 .

[6]  Simon Washington,et al.  Detecting, analysing, and modelling failed lane-changing attempts in traditional and connected environments , 2020 .

[7]  David Mahalel,et al.  A BEHAVIORAL APPROACH TO RISK ESTIMATION OF REAR-END COLLISIONS AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS , 1987 .

[8]  S. L. Chisholm,et al.  Do in-vehicle advanced signs enhance older and younger drivers' intersection performance Driving simulation and eye movement results , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  John O Sobanjo,et al.  Safety Evaluation of the Advanced Stop Assist System in Connected Vehicle Environment , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[10]  C Newton,et al.  Evaluation of an alternative traffic light change anticipation system. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Niladri Chatterjee,et al.  Impact of grade separator on pedestrian risk taking behavior. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Simon Washington,et al.  Gap Acceptance Behavior of Mobile Phone–Distracted Drivers at Roundabouts , 2016 .

[13]  Huimin Xiong,et al.  How do drivers behave during indecision zone maneuvers? , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Xiaoyan Huo,et al.  A Correlated Random Parameters Model with Heterogeneity in Means to Account for Unobserved Heterogeneity in Crash Frequency Analysis , 2020, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[15]  Sarvani Sonduru Pantangi,et al.  The effects of driver fatigue, gender, and distracted driving on perceived and observed aggressive driving behavior: A correlated grouped random parameters bivariate probit approach , 2019, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[16]  S. Washington,et al.  Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis , 2010 .

[17]  A. McCartt,et al.  Declines in fatal crashes of older drivers: changes in crash risk and survivability. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Wassim G. Najm,et al.  Analysis of Red Light Violation Data Collected from Intersections Equipped with Red Light Photo Enforcement Cameras , 2006 .

[19]  Nagendra R. Velaga,et al.  Driver behaviour at the onset of yellow signal: A comparative study of distraction caused by use of a phone and a music player , 2019, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[20]  Xuedong Yan,et al.  Classification analysis of driver's stop/go decision and red-light running violation. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Simon Washington,et al.  Understanding the discretionary lane-changing behaviour in the connected environment. , 2020, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Kristofer D. Kusano,et al.  Age and Gender Differences in Time to Collision at Braking From the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study , 2014, Traffic injury prevention.

[23]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Big data, traditional data and the tradeoffs between prediction and causality in highway-safety analysis , 2020, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[24]  Zuduo Zheng,et al.  The impact of the connected environment on driving behavior and safety: A driving simulator study. , 2020, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Influence of Age and Proximity Warning Devices on Collision Avoidance in Simulated Driving , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[26]  Panagiotis Papaioannou,et al.  Driver behaviour, dilemma zone and safety effects at urban signalized intersections in Greece. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Simon Washington,et al.  Decisions and actions of distracted drivers at the onset of yellow lights. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Matthew Rizzo,et al.  Distracted driving in elderly and middle-aged drivers. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Xiaomeng Li,et al.  Effect of auditory in-vehicle warning information on drivers’ brake response time to red-light running vehicles during collision avoidance , 2016 .

[30]  Byungkyu Brian Park,et al.  Development and Evaluation of a Cooperative Vehicle Intersection Control Algorithm Under the Connected Vehicles Environment , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[31]  Naveen Eluru,et al.  Disentangling the influence of cell phone usage in the dilemma zone: An econometric approach. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  Panagiotis Ch. Anastasopoulos,et al.  A preliminary investigation of the effectiveness of high visibility enforcement programs using naturalistic driving study data: A grouped random parameters approach , 2019, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[33]  Zuduo Zheng,et al.  A game theory-based approach for modelling mandatory lane-changing behaviour in a connected environment , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[34]  Alan Blatt,et al.  Analysis of stationary and dynamic factors affecting highway accident occurrence: A dynamic correlated grouped random parameters binary logit approach. , 2018, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[35]  Katsuya Matsunaga,et al.  Differences of drivers' reaction times according to age and mental workload. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[36]  Johnell O Brooks,et al.  Simulator sickness during driving simulation studies. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  Panagiotis Ch. Anastasopoulos,et al.  Analysis of accident injury-severities using a correlated random parameters ordered probit approach with time variant covariates , 2018, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[38]  J. Caird,et al.  The effect of yellow light onset time on older and younger drivers' perception response time (PRT) and intersection behavior , 2007 .

[39]  Chong-Cheng Hsu,et al.  The effect of a collision warning system on the driving performance of young drivers at intersections , 2009 .

[40]  K. Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households' Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level , 1998, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[41]  Allan F. Williams,et al.  Changes in crash risk following re-timing of traffic signal change intervals. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[42]  Zuduo Zheng,et al.  Human Factors in Modelling Mixed Traffic of Traditional, Connected, and Automated Vehicles , 2017, AHFE.

[43]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Analytic methods in accident research: Methodological frontier and future directions , 2014 .

[44]  Huasen Wan,et al.  Logit-Based Analysis of Drivers’ Crossing Behavior at Unsignalized Intersections in China , 2015, Hum. Factors.

[45]  Grigorios Fountas,et al.  An exploratory investigation of public perceptions towards safety and security from the future use of flying cars in the United States , 2019, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[46]  Ashish Bhaskar,et al.  Is an informed driver a better decision maker? A grouped random parameters with heterogeneity-in-means approach to investigate the impact of the connected environment on driving behaviour in safety-critical situations , 2020, Analytic Methods in Accident Research.

[47]  Stefanie Leung,et al.  Gap acceptance and risk-taking by young and mature drivers, both sober and alcohol-intoxicated, in a simulated driving task. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[48]  Bryan E. Porter,et al.  Predicting Red-Light Running Behavior: A Traffic Safety Study in Three Urban Settings , 2000 .

[49]  Simon Washington,et al.  A hazard-based duration model to quantify the impact of connected driving environment on safety during mandatory lane-changing , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[50]  Yasir Ali Investigation of lane-changing behaviour in a connected environment , 2020 .

[51]  J. Zhang,et al.  Age-specific patterns of factors related to fatal motor vehicle traffic crashes: focus on young and elderly drivers. , 1998, Public health.

[52]  Zuduo Zheng,et al.  Cooperate or not? Exploring drivers’ interactions and response times to a lane-changing request in a connected environment , 2020, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[53]  Zuduo Zheng,et al.  Connectivity’s impact on mandatory lane-changing behaviour: Evidences from a driving simulator study , 2018, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[54]  Michiel C.J. Bliemer,et al.  Comparing the usefulness of real-time driving aids in a connected environment during mandatory and discretionary lane-changing manoeuvres , 2020 .

[55]  A F Williams,et al.  Fatal crash risk for older drivers at intersections. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[56]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Unobserved heterogeneity and the statistical analysis of highway accident data , 2016 .

[57]  Yosef Sheffi,et al.  A Model of Driver Behavior at High Speed Signalized Intersections , 1981 .