A 13C-NMR Study on the 1,3-Dimethylolurea-Phenol Co-Condensation Reaction: A Model for Amino-Phenolic Co-Condensed Resin Synthesis

The reactions of di-hydroxymethylurea with phenol under alkaline (pH = 10), weak (pH = 6) and strong acidic (pH = 2) conditions were investigated via the 13C-NMR method. Based on the proposed reaction mechanisms, the variations of the structures of different condensed products were analyzed and the competitive relationship between self- and co-condensation reactions was elucidated. The required experimental conditions for co-condensations were clearly pointed out. The main conclusions include: (1) the self-condensation between urea formaldehyde (UF) or phenol formaldehyde (PF) monomers were dominant while the co-condensations were very limited under alkaline conditions. This is because the intermediates produced from urea, methylolurea and phenol are less reactive in co-condensations with respect to self-condensations; (2) under weak acidic conditions, the self-condensations occurred exclusively among the UF monomers. The co-condensation structures were not observed; and (3) the co-condensations became much more competitive under strong acidic conditions as the relative content of the co-condensed methylenic carbon accounts for 53.3%. This result can be rationalized by the high reactivity of the methylolphenol carbocation intermediate toward urea and methylolurea. The revealed reaction selectivity and mechanisms may also be applied to the synthesis of those more complex co-condensed adhesives based on natural phenolic and amino compounds.

[1]  G. Du,et al.  Re‐elucidation of the acid‐catalyzed urea–formaldehyde reactions: A theoretical and 13C‐NMR study , 2016 .

[2]  G. Du,et al.  Study on the Soy Protein-Based Wood Adhesive Modified by Hydroxymethyl Phenol , 2016, Polymers.

[3]  G. Du,et al.  Competitive formation of the methylene and methylene ether bridges in the urea–formaldehyde reaction in alkaline solution: a combined experimental and theoretical study , 2015, Wood Science and Technology.

[4]  A. Pizzi,et al.  Development and characterization of abrasive grinding wheels with a tannin-furanic resins matrix , 2015 .

[5]  F. Chu,et al.  13C NMR study on the structure of ZnO-catalyzed phenol–urea–formaldehyde resin during its synthesis process , 2014 .

[6]  A. Pizzi,et al.  Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization Time of Flight (MALDI-TOF) Mass Spectrometry of Phenol-Formaldehyde-Chestnut Tannin Resins , 2014 .

[7]  H. Hasse,et al.  On-Line NMR Spectroscopic Reaction Kinetic Study of Urea− Formaldehyde Resin Synthesis , 2014 .

[8]  Ruichen Ren,et al.  Effect of the molecular structure of phenolic novolac precursor resins on the properties of phenolic fibers , 2013 .

[9]  A. Mendes,et al.  13C NMR study of presence of uron structures in amino adhesives and relation with wood-based panels performance , 2013 .

[10]  A. Pizzi,et al.  Mechanical characterization of industrial particleboard panels glued with cornstarch–mimosa tannin–urea formaldehyde resins , 2013 .

[11]  A. Szczurek,et al.  Oligomer Distribution at the Gel Point of Tannin-resorcinol-formaldehyde Cold-Set Wood Adhesives , 2012 .

[12]  Wei Gao,et al.  INFLUENCE OF URON RESINS ON THE PERFORMANCE OF UF RESINS AS ADHESIVES FOR PLYWOOD , 2012 .

[13]  Antonio Pizzi,et al.  Cornstarch-mimosa tannin-urea formaldehyde resins as adhesives in the particleboard production , 2010 .

[14]  T. Pehk,et al.  Structure and curing mechanism of resol phenol-formaldehyde prepolymer resins , 2010 .

[15]  Jianzhang Li,et al.  13C‐NMR study on the structure of phenol‐urea‐formaldehyde resins prepared by methylolureas and phenol , 2009 .

[16]  Jianzhang Li,et al.  Chemical Structure and Curing Behavior of Phenol–Urea–Formaldehyde Cocondensed Resins of High Urea Content , 2009 .

[17]  G. Du,et al.  Synthesis–structure–performance relationship of cocondensed phenol–urea–formaldehyde resins by MALDI-ToF and 13C NMR , 2008 .

[18]  A. Kandelbauer,et al.  Comparative 13C‐NMR and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight analyses of species variation and structure maintenance during melamine–urea–formaldehyde resin preparation , 2007 .

[19]  T. Kondo,et al.  Condensation reactions of phenolic resins. VI. Dependence of the molecular association of 2,4,6‐trihydroxymethylphenol on the concentration in an aqueous alkaline medium , 2007 .

[20]  A. Pizzi,et al.  Fast vs. slow-reacting non-modified tannin extracts for exterior particleboard adhesives , 1994, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[21]  A. Pizzi.  Pine tannin adhesives for particleboard , 1982, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[22]  D. Grunwald,et al.  Preparation of phenol–urea–formaldehyde copolymer adhesives under heterogeneous catalysis , 2006 .

[23]  M. Krajnc,et al.  Characterization of phenol–urea–formaldehyde resin by inline FTIR spectroscopy , 2006 .

[24]  N. Yan,et al.  13C NMR study on structure, composition and curing behavior of phenol–urea–formaldehyde resole resins , 2004 .

[25]  Moon G. Kim,et al.  Syntheses and Properties of Low-Level Melamine-Modified Urea-Melamine-Formaldehyde Resins , 2004 .

[26]  Manihar A. Singh.  Preparation, molecular weight determination and structure elucidation of melamine-urea-formaldehyde, melamine-methylureaformaldehyde and melamine-dimethylureaformaldehyde polymer resins with IR spectroscopy , 2004 .

[27]  B. Riedl,et al.  Phenol‐urea‐formaldehyde cocondensed resol resins: Their synthesis, curing kinetics, and network properties , 2003 .

[28]  M. Morita,et al.  Condensation reactions of phenolic resins IV: self-condensation of 2,4-dihydroxymethylphenol and 2,4,6-trihydroxymethylphenol (2) , 2003, Journal of Wood Science.

[29]  L. Lorenz,et al.  Accelerated cure of phenol–formaldehyde resins: Studies with model compounds , 2002 .

[30]  M. Morita,et al.  Kinetics and Mechanisms of the Condensation Reactions of Phenolic Resins II. Base-Catalyzed Self-Condensation of 4-Hydroxymethylphenol , 2001 .

[31]  M. Morita,et al.  Condensation reactions of phenolic resins. 1. Kinetics and mechanisms of the base-catalyzed self-condensation of 2-hydroxymethylphenol , 2001 .

[32]  A. Pizzi,et al.  Fast advancement and hardening acceleration of low condensation alkaline phenol‐formaldehyde resins by esters and copolymerized urea. II. Esters during resin reaction and effect of guanidine salts , 2000 .

[33]  Moon G. Kim.  Examination of selected synthesis parameters for typical wood adhesive-type urea–formaldehyde resins by 13C-NMR spectroscopy. II , 2000 .

[34]  A. Pizzi,et al.  Fast advancement and hardening acceleration of low‐condensation alkaline PF resins by esters and copolymerized urea , 1999 .

[35]  Moon G. Kim.  Examination of selected synthesis parameters for typical wood adhesive‐type urea–formaldehyde resins by 13C NMR spectroscopy. I , 1999 .

[36]  M. Dunky,et al.  Urea–formaldehyde (UF) adhesive resins for wood , 1998 .

[37]  C. Hse,et al.  Phenol-urea-formaldehyde (PUF) co-condensed wood adhesives , 1998 .

[38]  A. Pizzi,et al.  13C‐NMR of Zn2+ acetate‐induced autocondensation of polyflavonoid tannins for phenolic polycondensates , 1995 .

[39]  P. Grenier,et al.  Phenolic resins: 1. Mechanisms and kinetics of phenol and of the first polycondensates towards formaldehyde in solution , 1994 .

[40]  C. Hse,et al.  Synthesis of Phenol-Urea-Formaldehyde Cocondehsed Resins from UF-Concentrate and Phenol , 1994 .

[41]  C. Hse,et al.  Syntheses and structural analyses of cocondensed resins from urea and methylolphenols , 1993 .

[42]  D. Francis,et al.  Kinetics and mechanism of urea-formaldehyde reaction , 1983 .

[43]  D. Ferreira,et al.  Condensates of phenol, resorcinol, phloroglucinol, and pyrogallol as model compounds of flavonoid A‐ and B‐rings with formaldehyde , 1979 .

[44]  A. Pizzi.  The chemistry and development of tannin/urea–formaldehyde condensates for exterior wood adhesives , 1979 .