THE EFFECT OF AUDIENCE SPECIFICATION ON UNDERGRADUATES: ATTITUDE, STRATEGIES, AND WRITING

This study investigated the effects of assigning an audience on undergraduates' attitudes, composing strategies, and persuasive writing. Eighty-seven students in an intermediate composition course took a writing pretest without an assigned audience. Then, they were randomly assigned to three posttest conditions: (a) imaginary assigned reader, (b) real assigned reader, and (c) no assigned reader. For all participants the posttest was a second draft about the pretest topic. When the assigned reader and English teachers rated the essays for persuasiveness, assigning an audience had a limited effect on the assigned reader's scores and no significant effect on the teachers' scores. However, analyses of questionnaire and interview data indicated that assigning an audience increased students' interest, effort, and use of audience-based strategies. In addition, the questionnaires revealed an audience effect across groups. That is, students who said they had thought of someone like the assigned reader were twice as likely to persuade the assigned reader as students who had not. Studies suggest that most secondary and college students are not adapting their writing to audiences beyond the classroom (Applebee, 1981; Britton, Burgess, Martin, McLeod, & Rosen, 1975; Cooper, 1984; NAEP, 1985, 1986). Some researchers have attributed this problem to a deficiency in students' (a) cognitive development (Lunsford, 1979; Moffett, 1968; Shaughnessy, 1977), (b) knowledge of text conventions (Dillon, 1981; Park, 1982, 1986), or (c) coordination of composing demands (Bereiter, 1980; Kroll, 1984; Scardamalia, 1981). While acknowledging these deficiencies, other researchers have argued that the school context also contributes to the problem (Applebee, 1981; Collins & Williamson, 1984). The studies cited above indicate that most school writing addresses overhearers teachers who are not personally involved with the topic. In contrast, most on-the-job writing addresses rhetorical audiences (see Anderson, 1985). According to Bitzer (1971), a rheThis article is based on the first author's doctoral dissertation (University of Maryland, 1987). The research was supported by a fellowship from the United Negro College Fund and by a grant from the University of Maryland, College Park. Research in the Teaching of English, Vol. 23, No. 1, February 1989

[1]  M. Joos The five clocks , 1962 .

[2]  Walker Gibson,et al.  Authors, Speakers, Readers, and Mock Readers , 1950 .

[3]  Dixie Goswami,et al.  Studying Writing in Non-Academic Settings , 2019, New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication.

[4]  Russell C. Long Writer-Audience Relationships: Analysis or Invention?. , 1980 .

[5]  Mina P. Shaughnessy,et al.  Errors and Expectations: A Guide for the Teacher of Basic Writing , 1979 .

[6]  Gene L. Piché,et al.  Development in Syntactic and Strategic Aspects of Audience Adaptation Skills in Written Persuasive Communication , 1979 .

[7]  Paul B. Diederich,et al.  Measuring Growth in English , 1974 .

[8]  D. Roen,et al.  The Effects of Audience Awareness on Drafting and Revising. , 1988 .

[9]  Marion Crowhurst,et al.  AUDIENCE AND MODE OF DISCOURSE EFFECTS ON SYNTACTIC COMPLEXITY IN WRITING AT TWO GRADE LEVELS , 1979 .

[10]  James Moffett,et al.  Teaching the universe of discourse , 1968 .

[11]  Gene L. Piché,et al.  Social Cognition and Writing , 1987 .

[12]  K. Burke A Rhetoric of Motives , 1969 .

[13]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation , 1971 .

[14]  Walter J. Ong,et al.  The Writer's Audience Is Always a Fiction , 1975 .

[15]  Arthur E. Walzer Articles from the 'California Divorce Project': A Case Study of the Concept of Audience , 1985 .

[16]  James Britton,et al.  The development of writing abilities (11-18) , 1975 .

[17]  William L. Smith,et al.  Adjusting Syntactic Structures to Varied Levels of Audience. , 1978 .

[18]  Barry M. Kroll Writing for Readers: Three Perspectives on Audience. , 1984 .

[19]  Brian D. Monahan,et al.  Revision Strategies of Basic and Competent Writers as They Write for Different Audiences. , 1982 .

[20]  John H. Flavell,et al.  The development of role-taking and communication skills in children , 1968 .

[21]  Linda Flower,et al.  The Dynamics of Composing : Making Plans and Juggling Constraints , 1980 .

[22]  D. Rubin,et al.  Social Cognitive Ability as a Predictor of the Quality of Expository and Persuasive Writing among College Freshmen. , 1986 .

[23]  Gordon Brossell Rhetorical Specification in Essay Examination Topics. , 1983 .

[24]  Douglas B. Park The Meanings of "Audience.". , 1982 .

[25]  R. G. Roth The Evolving Audience: Alternatives to Audience Accommodation. , 1987 .

[26]  P. Warr,et al.  The perception of people and events , 1971 .

[27]  Audience Adaptation in the Essays of Proficient and Nonproficient Freshman Writers. , 1985 .

[28]  A. Lunsford,et al.  Audience Addressed/Audience Invoked: The Role of Audience in Composition. , 1984 .

[29]  J. Delia,et al.  The Development of Functional Persuasive Skills in Childhood and Early Adolescence. , 1976 .

[30]  Linda Flower,et al.  Problem-solving strategies for writing , 1981 .

[31]  Linda Flower,et al.  Writer-Based Prose: A Cognitive Basis for Problems in Writing. , 1979 .

[32]  Barbara J. O'Keefe,et al.  Construct comprehensiveness and cognitive complexity as predictors of the number and strategic adaptation of arguments and appeals in a persuasive message , 1979 .

[33]  Edward E. Jones,et al.  Person perception 2nd ed. , 1979 .

[34]  Peter Elbow,et al.  Closing My Eyes as I Speak: An Argument for Ignoring Audience. , 1987 .

[35]  J. Piaget The Language and Thought of the Child , 1927 .

[36]  Carol Berkenkotter,et al.  Understanding a Writer’s Awareness of Audience , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[37]  Bonnie J. F. Meyer,et al.  Reading Research and the Composition Teacher: The Importance of Plans. , 1982 .

[38]  Arthur N. Applebee,et al.  Writing in the Secondary School: English and the Content Areas , 1981 .

[39]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[40]  L. Bitzer The Rhetorical Situation. , 1968 .

[41]  Paul Hoffman,et al.  The Private Worlds of Basic Writers. , 1984 .

[42]  D. Rubin Social Cognition and Written Communication , 1984 .