Political risk and environmental quality in Brazil : Role of green finance and green innovation

[1]  Jian Chen,et al.  Environmental regulations, political risk and consumption-based carbon emissions: Evidence from OECD economies. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  T. Adebayo,et al.  The role of renewable energy consumption and financial development in environmental sustainability: implications for the Nordic Countries , 2022, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology.

[3]  Xiaodong Yang,et al.  Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation: Exploring regional policy intervention effects in China , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[4]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Asymmetric effects of high-tech industry and renewable energy on consumption-based carbon emissions in MENA countries , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[5]  U. Pata,et al.  Do renewable and nuclear energy enhance environmental quality in France? A new EKC approach with the load capacity factor , 2022, Progress in Nuclear Energy.

[6]  Emma Serwaa Obobisa,et al.  The impact of green technological innovation and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in African countries , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[7]  Kangyin Dong,et al.  Nexus between green technology innovation, green financing, and CO 2 emissions in the G7 countries: The moderating role of social globalisation , 2022, Sustainable Development.

[8]  J. Ashraf.  The Spillover Effects of Political Risk, Financial Risk, and Economic Freedom on Ecological Footprint: Empirical Evidence from Belt and Road Initiative Countries , 2022, Borsa Istanbul Review.

[9]  Zeeshan Fareed,et al.  Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption and income in top ten renewable energy-consuming countries: Advanced Fourier based panel data approaches , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[10]  Mehmet Ağa,et al.  Financial sector development, external debt, and Turkey’s renewable energy consumption , 2022, PloS one.

[11]  A. Alola,et al.  A new approach to identifying high-tech manufacturing SMEs with sustainable technological development: Empirical evidence , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[12]  Turgut Tursoy,et al.  Renewable energy, banking sector development, and carbon dioxide emissions nexus: A path toward sustainable development in South Africa , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[13]  T. Adebayo.  Renewable Energy Consumption and Environmental Sustainability in Canada: Does Political Stability Make a Difference? , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[14]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Does political risk spur environmental issues in China? , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[15]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Role of technological innovation and globalization in BRICS economies: policy towards environmental sustainability , 2022, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology.

[16]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  Toward a sustainable environment and economic growth in BRICS economies: do innovation and globalization matter? , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[17]  Yasir Khan,et al.  The role of private investment in ICT on carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) mitigation: do renewable energy and political risk matter in Morocco? , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[18]  R. Alvarado,et al.  Environmental impact of the shadow economy, globalisation, and human capital: Capturing spillovers effects using spatial panel data approach. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  Muhammad Zubair Mumtaz,et al.  The dynamic nexus among financial development, renewable energy and carbon emissions: Moderating roles of globalization and institutional quality across BRI countries , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[20]  M. Irfan,et al.  Analyze the environmental sustainability factors of China: The role of fossil fuel energy and renewable energy , 2022, Renewable Energy.

[21]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: The moderating role of technological innovations , 2022, Resources Policy.

[22]  Fayuan Wang,et al.  The impact of environmental pollution and green finance on the high-quality development of energy based on spatial Dubin model , 2021, Resources Policy.

[23]  Cem Işık,et al.  Determinants of the load capacity factor in China: A novel dynamic ARDL approach for ecological footprint accounting , 2021, Resources Policy.

[24]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Do technological innovations have symmetric or asymmetric effects on environmental quality? Evidence from Pakistan , 2021 .

[25]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Role of political risk to achieve carbon neutrality: Evidence from Brazil. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  F. Shahzad,et al.  Asymmetric inter-linkages between green technology innovation and consumption-based carbon emissions in BRICS countries using quantile-on-quantile framework , 2021, Technology in Society.

[27]  U. Pata.  Do renewable energy and health expenditures improve load capacity factor in the USA and Japan? A new approach to environmental issues , 2021, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[28]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  Empowering the powerless: Does access to energy improve income inequality? , 2021, Energy Economics.

[29]  M. Karim,et al.  The role of green finance in reducing CO2 emissions: An empirical analysis , 2021 .

[30]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Impact of renewable energy consumption, globalization, and technological innovation on environmental degradation in Japan: application of wavelet tools , 2021, Environment, Development and Sustainability.

[31]  Xueqi Zhai,et al.  The relationship between technological innovation and green transformation efficiency in China: An empirical analysis using spatial panel data , 2021, Technology in Society.

[32]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  Impact of oil prices, the U.S interest rates on Turkey’s real estate market. New evidence from combined co-integration and bootstrap ARDL tests , 2021, PloS one.

[33]  J. Omojolaibi,et al.  Economic globalisation, institutions and environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa , 2021 .

[34]  Larissa M. Batrancea,et al.  Greening the Financial System in USA, Canada and Brazil: A Panel Data Analysis , 2020, Mathematics.

[35]  Recep Ulucak,et al.  Relationship between energy consumption and environmental sustainability in OECD countries: The role of natural resources rents , 2020 .

[36]  Haoqiang Wu,et al.  The impact of synergy effect between government subsidies and slack resources on green technology innovation , 2020 .

[37]  K. Jermsittiparsert,et al.  An optimal configuration for a battery and PEM fuel cell-based hybrid energy system using developed Krill herd optimization algorithm for locomotive application , 2020 .

[38]  U. Pata,et al.  Financial development, globalization and ecological footprint in G7: further evidence from threshold cointegration and fractional frequency causality tests , 2020, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[39]  Ataul Karim Patwary,et al.  Nexus between green finance and climate change mitigation in N-11 and BRICS countries: empirical estimation through difference in differences (DID) approach , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[40]  S. Managi,et al.  Green Innovation and Finance in Asia , 2020 .

[41]  Zhongju Liao,et al.  The effect of environmental policy tools on regional green innovation: Evidence from China , 2020 .

[42]  George N. Ike,et al.  Enhancing sustainable electricity consumption in a large ecological reserve–based country: the role of democracy, ecological footprint, economic growth, and globalisation in Brazil , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[43]  Derviş Kırıkkaleli.  Does political risk matter for economic and financial risks in Venezuela? , 2020 .

[44]  Danish,et al.  How do environmental technologies affect green growth? Evidence from BRICS economies. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[45]  Yingyuan Guo,et al.  Green Entrepreneurial Orientation and Green Innovation: The Mediating Effect of Supply Chain Learning , 2020, SAGE Open.

[46]  Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie,et al.  Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[47]  Kerui Du,et al.  Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[48]  Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie,et al.  Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: The role of energy and financial development. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[49]  M. Rahman.  Environmental degradation: The role of electricity consumption, economic growth and globalisation. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[50]  A. Acheampong.  Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: What causes what and where? , 2018, Energy Economics.

[51]  Yao Wang,et al.  The Role of Green Finance in Environmental Protection: Two Aspects of Market Mechanism and Policies , 2016 .

[52]  Nadine Gatzert,et al.  Determinants of Policy Risks of Renewable Energy Investments , 2015 .

[53]  A. Tiwari,et al.  Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Financial Development, International Trade and CO2 Emissions, in Indonesia , 2013 .

[54]  Yalcin Arslanturk,et al.  Economic growth and energy consumption causal nexus viewed through a bootstrap rolling window , 2010 .

[55]  Enrique Ortega,et al.  Convergence of ecological footprint and emergy analysis as a sustainability indicator of countries: Peru as case study , 2010 .

[56]  Richard J. Smith,et al.  Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships , 2001 .