The Scientific Basis of Uncertainty Factors Used in Setting Occupational Exposure Limits

The uncertainty factor concept is integrated into health risk assessments for all aspects of public health practice, including by most organizations that derive occupational exposure limits. The use of uncertainty factors is predicated on the assumption that a sufficient reduction in exposure from those at the boundary for the onset of adverse effects will yield a safe exposure level for at least the great majority of the exposed population, including vulnerable subgroups. There are differences in the application of the uncertainty factor approach among groups that conduct occupational assessments; however, there are common areas of uncertainty which are considered by all or nearly all occupational exposure limit-setting organizations. Five key uncertainties that are often examined include interspecies variability in response when extrapolating from animal studies to humans, response variability in humans, uncertainty in estimating a no-effect level from a dose where effects were observed, extrapolation from shorter duration studies to a full life-time exposure, and other insufficiencies in the overall health effects database indicating that the most sensitive adverse effect may not have been evaluated. In addition, a modifying factor is used by some organizations to account for other remaining uncertainties—typically related to exposure scenarios or accounting for the interplay among the five areas noted above. Consideration of uncertainties in occupational exposure limit derivation is a systematic process whereby the factors applied are not arbitrary, although they are mathematically imprecise. As the scientific basis for uncertainty factor application has improved, default uncertainty factors are now used only in the absence of chemical-specific data, and the trend is to replace them with chemical-specific adjustment factors whenever possible. The increased application of scientific data in the development of uncertainty factors for individual chemicals also has the benefit of increasing the transparency of occupational exposure limit derivation. Improved characterization of the scientific basis for uncertainty factors has led to increasing rigor and transparency in their application as part of the overall occupational exposure limit derivation process.

[1]  Gunnar Johanson,et al.  How are asthmatics included in the derivation of guideline values for emergency planning and response? , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[2]  A. Renwick Data-derived safety factors for the evaluation of food additives and environmental contaminants. , 1993, Food additives and contaminants.

[3]  Ord,et al.  Recommended Use of Body Weight 3/4 as the Default Method in Derivation of the Oral Reference Dose , 2013 .

[4]  Wout Slob,et al.  Deriving a Data-Based Interspecies Assessment Factor Using the NOAEL and the Benchmark Dose Approach , 2007, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[5]  D. Paustenbach,et al.  A proposed approach for setting occupational exposure limits for sensory irritants based on chemosensory models. , 2007, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[6]  Peter M. J. Bos,et al.  Probabilistic assessment factors for human health risk assessment. A practical guide , 2001 .

[7]  J C Swartout,et al.  Response to Comments on “An Approach for Modeling Noncancer Dose Responses with an Emphasis on Uncertainty” and “A Probabilistic Framework for the Reference Dose (Probabilistic RfD)” , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  Andrew G. Renwick Subdivision of Uncertainty Factors to Allow for Toxicokinetics and Toxicodynamics , 1999 .

[9]  Edward V. Sargent,et al.  Rationale for the Chemical-Specific Adjustment Factors Used to Derive an Occupational Exposure Limit for Timolol Maleate , 2004 .

[10]  P. A. Schulte,et al.  Considerations for Using Genetic and Epigenetic Information in Occupational Health Risk Assessment and Standard Setting , 2015, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[11]  E. V. Sargent,et al.  Investigations of the use of bioavailability data to adjust occupational exposure limits for active pharmaceutical ingredients. , 2009, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[12]  R. Agius,et al.  Occupational exposure limits for therapeutic substances. , 1989, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[13]  Martha Waters,et al.  Exposure Estimation and Interpretation of Occupational Risk: Enhanced Information for the Occupational Risk Manager , 2015, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[14]  Monika Batke,et al.  Interspecies extrapolation based on the RepDose database--a probabilistic approach. , 2013, Toxicology letters.

[15]  C. Y. Li,et al.  A review of the healthy worker effect in occupational epidemiology. , 1999, Occupational medicine.

[16]  Lisa M. Sweeney,et al.  Advances in Inhalation Dosimetry Models and Methods for Occupational Risk Assessment and Exposure Limit Derivation , 2015, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[17]  H W Leung,et al.  Scientific and practical considerations for the development of occupational exposure limits (OELs) for chemical substances. , 1992, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[18]  D. Krewski,et al.  The Global Landscape of Occupational Exposure Limits—Implementation of Harmonization Principles to Guide Limit Selection , 2015, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[19]  I W Davidson,et al.  Biological basis for extrapolation across mammalian species. , 1986, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[20]  W Slob,et al.  Assessment factors for human health risk assessment: a discussion paper. , 1999, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[21]  E J Calabrese,et al.  Uncertainty factors and interindividual variation. , 1985, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[22]  G. Scott Dotson,et al.  Derivation of immediately dangerous to life or health (IDLH) values , 2012 .

[23]  Michael L Dourson,et al.  Proposal of new uncertainty factor application to derive tolerable daily intake. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[24]  M. Abdel‐Rahman,et al.  Studies on the use of uncertainty factors in deriving RfDs , 1995 .

[25]  Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment , 2008 .

[26]  M L Dourson,et al.  Improvements in quantitative noncancer risk assessment. Sponsored by the Risk Assessment Specialty Section of the Society of Toxicology. , 1993, Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[27]  Agneta Falk-Filipsson,et al.  Assessment factors--applications in health risk assessment of chemicals. , 2007, Environmental research.

[28]  Edward V. Sargent,et al.  Case Studies of Categorical Data-Derived Adjustment Factors , 2001 .

[29]  R. Zielhuis,et al.  The use of a safety factor in setting health based permissible levels for occupational exposure , 1979, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[30]  B. P. Mcnamara,et al.  Concepts in health evaluation of commercial and industrial chemicals , 1975 .

[31]  M. Abdel‐Rahman,et al.  Evaluation of the use of uncertainty factors in deriving RfDs for some chlorinated compounds. , 1995, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.

[32]  M L Dourson,et al.  On Reference Dose (RFD) and Its Underlying Toxicity Data Base , 1992, Toxicology and industrial health.

[33]  Gunnar Damgård Nielsen,et al.  Background, approaches and recent trends for setting health-based occupational exposure limits: a minireview. , 2008, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[34]  D Hattis,et al.  Human variability in susceptibility to toxic chemicals--a preliminary analysis of pharmacokinetic data from normal volunteers. , 1987, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[35]  Edward V. Sargent,et al.  The Importance of Human Data in the Establishment of Occupational Exposure Limits , 2002 .

[36]  A I Nikiforov,et al.  A new approach to deriving community exposure guidelines from "no-observed-adverse-effect levels". , 1990, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[37]  A G Renwick,et al.  Safety factors and establishment of acceptable daily intakes. , 1991, Food additives and contaminants.

[38]  D. Gaylor,et al.  Percentiles of the Product of Uncertainty Factors for Establishing Probabilistic Reference Doses , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[39]  Michael Dourson,et al.  Differential sensitivity of children and adults to chemical toxicity. II. Risk and regulation. , 2002, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[40]  M Dourson,et al.  Guidelines for application of chemical-specific adjustment factors in dose/concentration-response assessment. , 2002, Toxicology.

[41]  Edward V. Sargent,et al.  Use of toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data to reduce uncertainties when setting occupational exposure limits for pharmaceuticals , 1997 .

[42]  Andrew Maier,et al.  Scientific criteria used for the development of occupational exposure limits for metals and other mining-related chemicals. , 2002, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[43]  E. V. Sargent,et al.  Establishing airborne exposure control limits in the pharmaceutical industry. , 1988, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[44]  Edward V. Sargent,et al.  Establishing Data-Derived Adjustment Factors from Published Pharmaceutical Clinical Trial Data , 1999 .

[45]  John B Morris,et al.  A validated hybrid computational fluid dynamics-physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for respiratory tract vapor absorption in the human and rat and its application to inhalation dosimetry of diacetyl. , 2011, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[46]  이수정 해외산업간호정보 - 미국 산업안전보건연구원(National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) 소개 , 2009 .

[47]  C S Weil,et al.  Statistics vs safety factors and scientific judgment in the evaluation of safety for man. , 1972, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[48]  M L Dourson,et al.  Regulatory history and experimental support of uncertainty (safety) factors. , 1983, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[49]  C. S. Weil,et al.  Safety Evaluation of Chemicals, Relationship between Short-and Long-Term Feeding Studies in Designing an Effective Toxicity Test , 1963 .

[50]  E J Calabrese,et al.  Lack of total independence of uncertainty factors (UFs): implications for the size of the total uncertainty factor. , 1993, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[51]  Guidance Document for the Use of Data in Development of Chemical-Specific Adjustment Factors ( CSAFs ) for Interspecies Differences and Human Variability in Dose / Concentration – Response Assessment , 2001 .

[52]  A G Renwick,et al.  Human variability and noncancer risk assessment--an analysis of the default uncertainty factor. , 1998, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[53]  Oprs Alert Guidance for Industry Estimating the Maximum Safe Starting Dose in Initial Clinical Trials for Therapeutics in Adult Healthy Volunteers , 2005 .

[54]  Michael Pelekis,et al.  Probabilistic Framework for the Estimation of the Adult and Child Toxicokinetic Intraspecies Uncertainty Factors , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[55]  R. Monson,et al.  Observations on the healthy worker effect. , 1986, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[56]  D Henschler Evaluation of adverse effects in the standard-setting process. , 1992, Toxicology letters.

[57]  齊藤 宏之,et al.  海外研究紹介 Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene , 2011 .

[58]  O. G. Fitzhugh,et al.  100-Fold margin of safety , 1954 .

[59]  Gunnar Johanson,et al.  Use of Uncertainty Factors by the SCOEL in their derivation of health-based Occupational Exposure Limits , 2010, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[60]  S. Fairhurst,et al.  The Uncertainty Factor in the setting of Occupational Exposure Standards , 1995 .

[61]  A. J. Bailer,et al.  Historical Context and Recent Advances in Exposure-Response Estimation for Deriving Occupational Exposure Limits , 2015, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[62]  V J Feron,et al.  Sub‐acute versus sub‐chronic oral toxicity study in rats: Comparative study of 82 compounds , 1984, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[63]  Bruce D. Naumann,et al.  Scientific basis for uncertainty factors used to establish occupational exposure limits for pharmaceutical active ingredients , 1995 .

[64]  M L Dourson,et al.  Evolution of science-based uncertainty factors in noncancer risk assessment. , 1996, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.