Quantification of the association of ventilation rates with sick building syndrome symptoms

Data from published studies were combined and analyzed to develop best-fit equations and curves quantifying the change in sick building syndrome (SBS) symptom prevalence with ventilation rate. For each study, slopes were calculated, representing the fractional change in SBS symptom prevalence per unit change in ventilation rate per person. Values of ventilation rate, associated with each value of slope, were also calculated. Linear regression equations were fit to the resulting data points, after weighting by study size. Integration of the slope-ventilation rate equations yielded curves of relative SBS symptom prevalence versus ventilation rate. Based on these analyses, relative SBS symptom prevalence increases approximately 23percent (12percent to 32percent) as the ventilation rate drops from 10 to 5 L/s-person and relative prevalence decreases approximately 29percent (15percent to 42percent) as ventilation rate increases from 10 to 25 L/s-person.

[1]  O Seppänen,et al.  Ventilation and performance in office work. , 2006, Indoor air.

[2]  K W Tham,et al.  Effects of temperature and outdoor air supply rate on the performance of call center operators in the tropics. , 2004, Indoor air.

[3]  Olli Seppänen,et al.  Indoor air quality requirements for healthy office buildings: Recommendations based on an epidemiologic study , 1991 .

[4]  O Seppänen,et al.  Ventilation and health in non-industrial indoor environments: report from a European multidisciplinary scientific consensus meeting (EUROVEN). , 2002, Indoor air.

[5]  O Seppänen,et al.  Air recirculation and sick building syndrome: a blinded crossover trial. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[6]  J Sundell,et al.  The Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) in office workers. A case-referent study of personal, psychosocial and building-related risk indicators. , 1994, International journal of epidemiology.

[7]  William J. Fisk,et al.  Association of ventilation with health and other responses in commercial and institutional buildings , 2000 .

[8]  Pawel Wargocki,et al.  The performance and subjective responses of call-center operators with new and used supply air filters at two outdoor air supply rates. , 2004, Indoor air.

[9]  J. Jaakkola,et al.  Ventilation rate in office buildings and sick building syndrome. , 1995, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[10]  R Menzies,et al.  The effect of varying levels of outdoor-air supply on the symptoms of sick building syndrome. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.