DNA sequencing shows that tropical tuna species misidentification can be an underestimated issue in fish landings

[1]  J. Isaksen,et al.  Unpacking the tuna traceability mosaic – EU SFPAs and the tuna value chain , 2022, Marine Policy.

[2]  Qiuping Li,et al.  Real-time Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Using Self-quenching Fluorogenic Probes: the Application in Skipjack Tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) Authentication , 2021, Food Analytical Methods.

[3]  Yu-Chun Wang,et al.  Product Authentication Using Two Mitochondrial Markers Reveals Inconsistent Labeling and Substitution of Canned Tuna Products in the Taiwanese Market , 2021, Foods.

[4]  X. Ying,et al.  Development of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for rapid screening of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in processed fish products , 2021 .

[5]  Benjamin J. Wainwright,et al.  Sharks in hot soup: DNA barcoding of shark species traded in Singapore , 2021 .

[6]  I. Mascio,et al.  Molecular Approaches to Agri-Food Traceability and Authentication: An Updated Review , 2021, Foods.

[7]  Yu-Chun Wang,et al.  Authentication of fish species served in conveyor-belt sushi restaurants in Taiwan using DNA barcoding , 2021 .

[8]  Zachary J Gold,et al.  Characterizing Industrial and Artisanal Fishing Vessel Catch Composition Using Environmental DNA and Satellite-Based Tracking Data , 2021, Foods.

[9]  J. Granadeiro,et al.  Tunas off northwest Africa: The epipelagic diet of The Bigeye and Skipjack tunas , 2021, Fisheries Research.

[10]  A. Vantarakis,et al.  Does Traceability Lead to Food Authentication? A Systematic Review from A European Perspective , 2021 .

[11]  Jessica A. Gephart,et al.  Risks shift along seafood supply chains , 2021 .

[12]  R. Hanel,et al.  Consumers of mislabeled tropical fish exhibit increased risks of ciguatera intoxication: A report on substitution patterns in fish imported at Frankfurt Airport, Germany , 2021 .

[13]  Zora Piskatá,et al.  Identification of Selected Tuna Species in Commercial Products , 2021, Molecules.

[14]  Pengjun Zhang,et al.  Widespread mislabeling of nonnative apple snails (Ampullariidae: Pomacea) as native field snails (Viviparidae: Cipangopaludina) on the Chinese food markets , 2021 .

[15]  Andrew P. Morse,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fish and seafood processed products - A review of methodologies and new challenges. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  K. Kappel,et al.  Difficulties in DNA barcoding-based authentication of snapper products due to ambiguous nucleotide sequences in public databases , 2020 .

[17]  K. Cochrane.  Reconciling sustainability, economic efficiency and equity in marine fisheries: Has there been progress in the last 20 years? , 2020 .

[18]  E. Garcia-Vazquez,et al.  Seventeen years analysing mislabelling from DNA barcodes: Towards hake sustainability , 2020 .

[19]  Quentin Hanich,et al.  Resource allocation in transboundary tuna fisheries: A global analysis , 2020, Ambio.

[20]  Isabel Mafra,et al.  DNA barcode markers applied to seafood authentication: an updated review , 2020, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[21]  R. H. Nilsson,et al.  Significant taxon sampling gaps in DNA databases limit the operational use of marine macrofauna metabarcoding , 2020, Marine Biodiversity.

[22]  Athanassios C. Tsikliras,et al.  Seafood mislabeling in Greek market using DNA barcoding , 2020 .

[23]  Yanhua Jiang,et al.  Methodology and application of PCR‐RFLP for species identification in tuna sashimi , 2020, Food science & nutrition.

[24]  K. J. Oswald,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of the mislabeling of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) products in Spain , 2020 .

[25]  L. Lucifora,et al.  Are we sure we eat what we buy? Fish mislabelling in Buenos Aires province, the largest sea food market in Argentina , 2020 .

[26]  A. Galimberti,et al.  From DNA barcoding to personalized nutrition: the evolution of food traceability , 2019, Current Opinion in Food Science.

[27]  Lixia Lu,et al.  DNA Barcoding Revealed Mislabeling and Potential Health Concerns with Roasted Fish Products Sold across China. , 2019, Journal of food protection.

[28]  Christopher M. Anderson,et al.  The fishery performance indicators for global tuna fisheries , 2019, Nature Communications.

[29]  L. Webster,et al.  DNA barcoding validates species labelling of certified seafood , 2019, Current Biology.

[30]  F. Foresti,et al.  DNA Barcode reveals mislabelling in the identification of marine fish swimming bladders for commercialization. , 2019, Forensic Science International.

[31]  Rachel B. Isaacs,et al.  Identification of shark species in commercial products using DNA barcoding , 2019, Fisheries Research.

[32]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Phylotranscriptomic Insights into the Diversification of Endothermic Thunnus Tunas , 2018, Molecular biology and evolution.

[33]  Mauricio A. Urbina,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of metal concentrations in canned tuna fish in Iran and human health risk assessment. , 2018, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[34]  A. Jaeckel,et al.  The Future of Ocean Governance , 2018 .

[35]  G. Kumar.  Mercury Concentrations in Fresh and Canned Tuna: A Review , 2018 .

[36]  A. Amorim,et al.  Tuna fish identification using mtDNA markers , 2017 .

[37]  A. Hobday,et al.  Tunas and their fisheries: safeguarding sustainability in the twenty-first century , 2017, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[38]  D. Cawthorn,et al.  Global trade statistics lack granularity to inform traceability and management of diverse and high-value fishes , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[39]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  Harnessing the Power of Genomics to Secure the Future of Seafood. , 2017, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  A. Gordoa,et al.  Tuna Species Substitution in the Spanish Commercial Chain: A Knock-On Effect , 2017, PloS one.

[41]  D. Squires,et al.  Local, regional and global markets: what drives the tuna fisheries? , 2017, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[42]  Ben Nichols,et al.  VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics , 2016, PeerJ.

[43]  X. Irigoien,et al.  RAD-seq derived genome-wide nuclear markers resolve the phylogeny of tunas. , 2016, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[44]  P. Taberlet,et al.  obitools: a unix‐inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[45]  L. Ruiz-Garcia,et al.  Food traceability: New trends and recent advances. A review , 2015 .

[46]  M. Kondoh,et al.  MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[47]  H. Rehbein,et al.  Authentication of raw and processed tuna from Indonesian markets using DNA barcoding, nuclear gene and character-based approach , 2014, European Food Research and Technology.

[48]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR , 2013, Bioinform..

[49]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[50]  Paramvir S. Dehal,et al.  FastTree 2 – Approximately Maximum-Likelihood Trees for Large Alignments , 2010, PloS one.

[51]  F. Santaclara,et al.  Development of a method for the identification of scombroid and common substitute species in seafood products by FINS , 2009 .

[52]  Sergi Tudela,et al.  A Validated Methodology for Genetic Identification of Tuna Species (Genus Thunnus) , 2009, PloS one.

[53]  J. Graves,et al.  Specific identification of western Atlantic Ocean scombrids using mitochondrial DNA cytochrome C oxidase subunit I (COI) gene region sequences , 2007 .

[54]  Jian Ye,et al.  BLAST: improvements for better sequence analysis , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[55]  A. K. Lockley,et al.  Novel method for the discrimination of tuna (Thunnus thynnus) and bonito (Sarda sarda) DNA. , 2000, Journal of agricultural and food chemistry.