Metacognitive Beliefs and Strategies in Learning Chinese as a Foreign Language.

Abstract The study investigates the effects of second-year university students’ metacognitive beliefs and strategies on learning Chinese as a Foreign Language (CFL). The analysis shows that metacognitive beliefs, which identify students who are confident about their ability to learn a foreign language, are positively associated with students’ CFL achievement results. Successful students are found to have confidence in their abilities. Metacognitive strategies also influence students’ CFL achievement results. Students who show self-regulation by monitoring their progress, persevering at tasks and setting realistic goals are more successful. These are strategies that are essential for learners who wish to assume responsibility for their language learning. The study confirms Shen’s (Shen, H.H., 2005. An investigation of Chinese character learning strategies among non-native speakers of Chinese. System, 33, 49–68) conclusion that students should be encouraged to analyse their own learning processes in order to improve their metacognitive learning strategies, which will reinforce motivational aspects of self-efficacy. The pedagogical implications of the study are that teachers can help students to think about what happens during the CFL learning process and identify effective strategies, leading to improved language learning and higher levels of self-esteem and confidence.

[1]  Ian McGrath,et al.  Learner Autonomy, Teacher Autonomy: Future Directions , 2000 .

[2]  S. Paris,et al.  How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. , 1990 .

[3]  Marion Williams,et al.  Psychology for language teachers : a social constructivist approach , 1997 .

[4]  Z. Mevarech,et al.  The effects of metacognitive training versus worked-out examples on students' mathematical reasoning. , 2003, The British journal of educational psychology.

[5]  Z. Dörnyei,et al.  A New Approach to Assessing Strategic Learning: The Case of Self-Regulation in Vocabulary Acquisition , 2006 .

[6]  Charles J. Brainerd,et al.  Cognitive Learning and Memory in Children , 1985 .

[7]  Zohreh Eslami Rasekh,et al.  Metacognitive Strategy Training for Vocabulary Learning. , 2003 .

[8]  D. J. Young.  Creating a Low‐Anxiety Classroom Environment: What Does Language Anxiety Research Suggest? , 1991 .

[9]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. , 1994 .

[10]  Helen H. Shen.  An Investigation of Chinese-Character Learning Strategies among Non-Native Speakers of Chinese. , 2005 .

[11]  Tricia Hedge,et al.  Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom , 2000 .

[12]  Nae-Dong Yang,et al.  The relationship between EFL learners' beliefs and learning strategy use , 1999 .

[13]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[14]  C. Weinstein,et al.  Self-regulated learning: The interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting , 1992 .

[15]  L. Zhang,et al.  Awareness in Reading: EFL Students ' Metacognitive Knowledge of Reading Strategies in an Acquisition-poor Environment , 2001 .

[16]  Catherine McBride-Chang,et al.  Memory, print exposure, and metacognition: Components of reading in chinese children , 1995 .

[17]  Donglan Zhang,et al.  Strategy Knowledge and Perceived Strategy Use: Singaporean Students’ Awareness of Listening and Speaking Strategies , 2006 .

[18]  J. Carroll.  A Model of School Learning , 1963, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[19]  Marguerite Ann Snow,et al.  Academic Success for English Language Learners: Strategies for K-12 Mainstream Teachers , 2004 .

[20]  A. Wenden.  An introduction to Metacognitive Knowledge and Beliefs in Language Learning: beyond the basics , 1999 .

[21]  Rebecca L. Oxford,et al.  Language learning motivation : pathways to the new century , 1996 .

[22]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[23]  Robert C. Gardner,et al.  Expanding the Motivation Construct in Language Learning , 1995 .

[24]  J. Flavell.  Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[25]  A. Wenden,et al.  Learner Strategies For Learner Autonomy , 1991 .

[26]  R. Oxford,et al.  Comparing Theories of Language Learning Strategies: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 2002 .

[27]  B. Zimmerman.  Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. , 2000 .

[28]  Suzanne Graham.  Learners' Metacognitive Beliefs , 2003 .

[29]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[30]  Metacognition: Students in charge of their thinking , 1985 .

[31]  Andrew D. Cohen,et al.  Strategies in learning and using a second language , 1998 .

[32]  Sara Cotterall,et al.  Key variables in language learning: what do learners believe about them? , 1999 .

[33]  M. Clifford,et al.  Thoughts on a theory of constructive failure , 1984 .

[34]  Anita L. Wenden,et al.  What do Second-Language Learners Know about their Language Learning? A Second Look at Retrospective Accounts1 , 1986 .

[35]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Mslq) , 1993 .

[36]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[37]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Sample size in factor analysis. , 1999 .

[38]  R. Newman,et al.  Social Contexts and Functions of Children’s Remembering , 1985 .

[39]  J. Michael O'Malley,et al.  Learning strategies in second language acquisition , 1990 .

[40]  Suzanne Graham,et al.  Effective language learning : positive strategies for advanced level language learning , 1997 .

[41]  Peter N. Winograd,et al.  Passive Failure in Reading , 1985 .

[42]  Robert J. Marzano,et al.  Dimensions of Thinking: A Framework for Curriculum and Instruction , 1988 .

[43]  Neil J. Anderson.  The Role of Metacognition in Second Language Teaching and Learning. ERIC Digest. , 2002 .

[44]  Dale H. Schunk,et al.  Sequential Attributional Feedback and Children's Achievement Behaviors , 1984 .