Avian sensitivity to mortality: prioritising migratory bird species for assessment at proposed wind farms.

Wind power generation is likely to constitute one of the most extensive human physical exploitation activities of European marine areas in the near future. The many millions of migrating birds that pass these man-made obstacles are protected by international obligations and the subject of public concerns. Yet some bird species are more sensitive to bird-wind turbine mortality than others. This study developed a simple and logical framework for ranking bird species with regard to their relative sensitivity to bird-wind turbine-collisions, and applied it to a data set comprising 38 avian migrant species at the Nysted offshore wind farm in Denmark. Two indicators were selected to characterize the sensitivity of each individual species: 1) relative abundance and 2) demographic sensitivity (elasticity of population growth rate to changes in adult survival). In the case-study from the Nysted offshore wind farm, birds of prey and waterbirds dominated the group of high priority species and only passerines showed a low risk of being impacted by the wind farm. Even where passerines might be present in very high numbers, they often represent insignificant segments of huge reference populations that, from a demographic point of view, are relatively insensitive to wind farm-related adult mortality. It will always be important to focus attention and direct the resources towards the most sensitive species to ensure cost-effective environmental assessments in the future, and in general, this novel index seems capable of identifying the species that are at high risk of being adversely affected by wind farms.

[1]  Hal Caswell,et al.  Pod-specific demography of killer whales(Orcinus orca). , 1993 .

[2]  Stefan Garthe,et al.  Scaling possible adverse effects of marine wind farms on seabirds: developing and applying a vulnerability index , 2004 .

[3]  Thomas Kjær Christensen,et al.  Information needs to support environmental impact assessment of the effects of European marine offshore wind farms on birds , 2006 .

[4]  F. Vuilleumier.  Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The Birds of the Western Palearctic. Volume V: Tyrant Flycatchers to Thrushes , 1990 .

[5]  M. Desholm.  How much do small‐scale changes in flight direction increase overall migration distance? , 2003 .

[6]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  The expert or the algorithm?—comparison of priority conservation areas in the Cape Floristic Region identified by park managers and reserve selection software , 2003 .

[7]  Steven R. Beissinger,et al.  REPORT OF THE AOU CONSERVATION COMMITTEE ON THE PARTNERS IN FLIGHT SPECIES PRIORITIZATION PLAN , 2000 .

[8]  Luis J. Barrios,et al.  Behavioural and environmental correlates of soaring-bird mortality at on-shore wind turbines , 2004 .

[9]  Stéphane Legendre.  Demographic stochasticity: a case study using the ULM software , 1999 .

[10]  S. Cramp.  Flycatchers to shrikes , 1993 .

[11]  P. Holgate,et al.  Matrix Population Models. , 1990 .

[12]  H. Kroon,et al.  ELASTICITIES: A REVIEW OF METHODS AND MODEL LIMITATIONS , 2000 .

[13]  W. Hagemeijer,et al.  The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds , 1997 .

[14]  W. Kempton,et al.  Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors , 2007 .

[15]  R. Lande,et al.  Stochastic Population Dynamics in Ecology and Conservation , 2003 .

[16]  James E. Hines,et al.  Annual survival rates of adult and immature eastern population tundra swans , 1992 .

[17]  L. Crowder,et al.  LIFE HISTORIES AND ELASTICITY PATTERNS: PERTURBATION ANALYSIS FOR SPECIES WITH MINIMAL DEMOGRAPHIC DATA , 2000 .

[18]  H. Southern,et al.  Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa; the Birds of the Western Palearctic , 1978 .

[19]  S. Cramp.  Terns to woodpeckers , 1985 .

[20]  D. Macdonald,et al.  The sustainability of the common crane (Grus grus) flock breeding in Norfolk: insights from simulation modelling , 2001 .

[21]  Neri Report.  Environmental impact assessment of an offshore wind park at Rødsand: Technical report on birds , 2000 .

[22]  B. Sæther,et al.  AVIAN LIFE HISTORY VARIATION AND CONTRIBUTION OF DEMOGRAPHIC TRAITS TO THE POPULATION GROWTH RATE , 2000 .

[23]  P. Forslund,et al.  Intraspecific nest parasitism and adoption of young in the barnaele goose: effects on survival and reproductive performance , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  H. Moller,et al.  Can PVA models using computer packages offer useful conservation advice? Sooty shearwaters Puffinus griseus in New Zealand as a case study , 1995 .

[25]  D. Lieske,et al.  EFFECTS OF POPULATION DENSITY ON SURVIVAL IN MERLINS , 2000 .

[26]  S. Cramp.  Hawks to bustards , 1980 .

[27]  Michael J. Wisdom,et al.  Reliability of Conservation Actions Based on Elasticity Analysis of Matrix Models , 1999 .

[28]  M. Araújo,et al.  Apples, Oranges, and Probabilities: Integrating Multiple Factors into Biodiversity Conservation with Consistency , 2002 .

[29]  Jean Clobert,et al.  ULM, a software for conservation and evolutionary biologists , 1995 .

[30]  H. Caswell,et al.  Demographic Responses of Estuarine Polychaetes to Pollutants: Life Table Response Experiments , 1996 .

[31]  S. Cramp.  Waders to gulls , 1983 .

[32]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[33]  S. Cramp.  Crows to finches , 1994 .

[34]  F. Servello.  Population research priorities for Black Terns developed from modeling analyses , 2000 .

[35]  M. Desholm,et al.  Avian collision risk at an offshore wind farm , 2005, Biology Letters.

[36]  R. Lambeck,et al.  Focal Species: a Multi-species Umbrella for Nature Conservation Focal Species for Nature Conservation Lambeck , 2022 .

[37]  S. Cramp.  Tyrant flycatchers to thrushes , 1988 .

[38]  D. Chamberlain,et al.  The effect of avoidance rates on bird mortality predictions made by wind turbine collision risk models , 2006 .

[39]  Stéphane Legendre,et al.  Matrix population models applied to viability analysis and conservation: Theory and practice using the ULM software , 1996 .

[40]  D. P. Faith,et al.  Integrating conservation and development: effective trade-offs between biodiversity and cost in the selection of protected areas , 1996, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[41]  S. Cramp.  Ostrich to ducks , 1977 .

[42]  David N. Pashley,et al.  Conservation Report: Setting Conservation Priorities for Landbirds in the United States: The Partners in Flight Approach , 2000 .

[43]  A. Grant,et al.  Elasticity analysis as an important tool in evolutionary and population ecology. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  Ullas Karanth,et al.  An Ecology‐Based Method for Defining Priorities for Large Mammal Conservation: The Tiger as Case Study , 1998 .