3D soft tissue evaluation of a Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expander and facemask in pre-pubertal phase - a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this prospective controlled study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the rapid maxillary expander (RME) and facemask treatment by using three-dimensional soft tissue facial characteristics of pre-pubertal Class III children. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION CLIII and non-CLIII groups, both of 32 white children aged 6-8 years participated. MATERIAL AND METHODS Facial surface images were obtained using stereophotogrammetry at T0 and T1 and were superimposed. Landmark-based and surface-based facial parameters were measured and group differences were quantified (ANOVA; P ≥ 0.05). RESULTS CLIII children had less mid-face prominence, shorter lower facial height and protruded mandible when compared to non-CLIII children at T0. At T1, the differences between the groups were not statistically significant, indicating successful correction. After the RME/facemask treatment, the n-sn and sn-pg distances increased by 1.5 mm and 2.2 mm, respectively. The distance from sn to the n-pg line increased by 1 mm, the n-sn-pg angle decreased by almost 2°. Pogonion moved downward by 2.5 mm and posteriorly by 3 mm. The surface-based measurements between the groups after treatment showed anterior movement in the mid-face region and the upper lip region. The lower lip and chin region moved posteriorly in the CLIII group and anteriorly in the non-CLIII group. CONCLUSIONS After RME/facemask treatment the lower facial height increased, the maxilla moved anteriorly and the mandible moved posteriorly. Consequently CLIII children reached the respective values of the non-CLIII children, indicating a harmonious facial appearance of CLIII children. The results have been obtained using non-invasive technique.

[1]  V. Moshkelgosha,et al.  Photogrammetric Comparison of Facial Soft Tissue Profile before and after Protraction Facemask Therapy in Class III Children (6-11 Years Old) , 2017, Journal of dentistry.

[2]  G. Perinetti,et al.  Facial soft tissue changes during the pre-pubertal and pubertal growth phase: a mixed longitudinal laser-scanning study , 2017, European journal of orthodontics.

[3]  Yong Wang,et al.  Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Facial Scan for Facial Deformities in Clinics: A New Evaluation Method for Facial Scanner Accuracy , 2017, PloS one.

[4]  S. Richmond,et al.  Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Facial Morphological Variation: A 3D Population-Based Twin Study , 2016, PloS one.

[5]  H. Worthington,et al.  Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial , 2016, Journal of orthodontics.

[6]  Furkan Dindaroğlu,et al.  Effects of rapid maxillary expansion on facial soft tissues , 2016, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[7]  E. Esenlik,et al.  Comparison of short-term effects between face mask and skeletal anchorage therapy with intermaxillary elastics in patients with maxillary retrognathia. , 2016, European journal of orthodontics.

[8]  M. Piancino,et al.  Methodological Quality and Outcome of Systematic Reviews Reporting on Orthopaedic Treatment for Class III Malocclusion: Overview of Systematic Reviews , 2016, Journal of orthodontics.

[9]  Tancan Uysal,et al.  Reproducibility and reliability of three-dimensional soft tissue landmark identification using three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry. , 2016, The Angle orthodontist.

[10]  L. Franchi,et al.  Comparisons of two protocols for the early treatment of Class III dentoskeletal disharmony. , 2016, European journal of orthodontics.

[11]  S. Richmond,et al.  Diagnosis of Class III malocclusion in 7- to 8-year-old children--a 3D evaluation. , 2015, European journal of orthodontics.

[12]  E. Eskin,et al.  Quantitative analysis of 3-dimensional facial soft tissue photographic images: technical methods and clinical application , 2015, Progress in orthodontics.

[13]  A. Wasserstein,et al.  Comparison of lateral photographic and radiographic sagittal analysis in relation to Angle’s classification , 2015, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[14]  P. Ngan,et al.  Evolution of Class III treatment in orthodontics. , 2015, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[15]  W. Proffit,et al.  Growth modification of the face: A current perspective with emphasis on Class III treatment. , 2015, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  Wei Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Maxillary Protraction with or without Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Age Factors in Treating Class III Malocclusion: A Meta-Analysis , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  H. Oktay,et al.  Comparison of the soft and hard tissue effects of two different protraction mechanisms in class III patients: a randomized clinical trial , 2015, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[18]  S. Richmond,et al.  Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry among pre-pubertal class III subjects: a controlled study. , 2014, European journal of orthodontics.

[19]  S. Lindauer,et al.  Efficacy of orthopedic treatment with protraction facemask on skeletal Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2014, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[20]  S. Richmond,et al.  Three-dimensional evaluation of facial morphology in children aged 5-6 years with a Class III malocclusion. , 2014, European journal of orthodontics.

[21]  Ahmed A Ghoneima,et al.  Orthodontic soft-tissue parameters: a comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and the 3dMD imaging system. , 2013, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[22]  H. Worthington,et al.  Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[23]  L. Franchi,et al.  Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: a long-term controlled study. , 2011, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[24]  R. Behrents,et al.  Craniofacial growth of Class III subjects six to sixteen years of age. , 2011, The Angle orthodontist.

[25]  H. Oktay,et al.  Soft tissue profile changes following maxillary protraction in Class III subjects. , 2010, European journal of orthodontics.

[26]  Gernot Göz,et al.  Implementing a Superimposition and Measurement Model for 3D Sagittal Analysis of Therapy-induced Changes in Facial Soft Tissue: a Pilot Study , 2010, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[27]  A. Stellzig-Eisenhauer,et al.  3D Soft Tissue Analysis – Part 1: Sagittal Parameters , 2010, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[28]  J. McNamara,et al.  An estimate of craniofacial growth in Class III malocclusion. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[29]  J. McNamara,et al.  Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[30]  S Richmond,et al.  Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on 3D laser-scanned facial images. , 2009, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[31]  L. Franchi,et al.  Orthopedic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion. A systematic review. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[32]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[33]  L. Franchi,et al.  Phases of the dentition for the assessment of skeletal maturity: a diagnostic performance study. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[34]  P. Ngan Early treatment of Class III malocclusion: is it worth the burden? , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[35]  P. Cozza,et al.  An orthopaedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusions in the early mixed dentition. , 2004, European journal of orthodontics.

[36]  E. Gunel,et al.  Cephalometric and occlusal changes following maxillary expansion and protraction. , 1998, European journal of orthodontics.

[37]  J Delaire,et al.  Maxillary development revisited: relevance to the orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusions. , 1997, European journal of orthodontics.