Screening for Prostate Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement

Importance In the United States, the lifetime risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer is approximately 13%, and the lifetime risk of dying of prostate cancer is 2.5%. The median age of death from prostate cancer is 80 years. Many men with prostate cancer never experience symptoms and, without screening, would never know they have the disease. African American men and men with a family history of prostate cancer have an increased risk of prostate cancer compared with other men. Objective To update the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation on prostate-specific antigen (PSA)–based screening for prostate cancer. Evidence Review The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the benefits and harms of PSA-based screening for prostate cancer and subsequent treatment of screen-detected prostate cancer. The USPSTF also commissioned a review of existing decision analysis models and the overdiagnosis rate of PSA-based screening. The reviews also examined the benefits and harms of PSA-based screening in patient subpopulations at higher risk of prostate cancer, including older men, African American men, and men with a family history of prostate cancer. Findings Adequate evidence from randomized clinical trials shows that PSA-based screening programs in men aged 55 to 69 years may prevent approximately 1.3 deaths from prostate cancer over approximately 13 years per 1000 men screened. Screening programs may also prevent approximately 3 cases of metastatic prostate cancer per 1000 men screened. Potential harms of screening include frequent false-positive results and psychological harms. Harms of prostate cancer treatment include erectile dysfunction, urinary incontinence, and bowel symptoms. About 1 in 5 men who undergo radical prostatectomy develop long-term urinary incontinence, and 2 in 3 men will experience long-term erectile dysfunction. Adequate evidence shows that the harms of screening in men older than 70 years are at least moderate and greater than in younger men because of increased risk of false-positive results, diagnostic harms from biopsies, and harms from treatment. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that the net benefit of PSA-based screening for prostate cancer in men aged 55 to 69 years is small for some men. How each man weighs specific benefits and harms will determine whether the overall net benefit is small. The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that the potential benefits of PSA-based screening for prostate cancer in men 70 years and older do not outweigh the expected harms. Conclusions and Recommendation For men aged 55 to 69 years, the decision to undergo periodic PSA-based screening for prostate cancer should be an individual one and should include discussion of the potential benefits and harms of screening with their clinician. Screening offers a small potential benefit of reducing the chance of death from prostate cancer in some men. However, many men will experience potential harms of screening, including false-positive results that require additional testing and possible prostate biopsy; overdiagnosis and overtreatment; and treatment complications, such as incontinence and erectile dysfunction. In determining whether this service is appropriate in individual cases, patients and clinicians should consider the balance of benefits and harms on the basis of family history, race/ethnicity, comorbid medical conditions, patient values about the benefits and harms of screening and treatment-specific outcomes, and other health needs. Clinicians should not screen men who do not express a preference for screening. (C recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against PSA-based screening for prostate cancer in men 70 years and older. (D recommendation)

[1]  Martin Fortin,et al.  Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care , 2012 .

[2]  Jianfeng Xu,et al.  Impact of family history on prostate cancer mortality in white men undergoing prostate specific antigen based screening. , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[3]  Virginia Moyer,et al.  The US Preventive Services Task Force , 2015, North Carolina Medical Journal.

[4]  M. Stampfer,et al.  The high prevalence of undiagnosed prostate cancer at autopsy: implications for epidemiology and treatment of prostate cancer in the Prostate‐specific Antigen‐era , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[5]  T. Tammela,et al.  Family history in the Finnish Prostate Cancer Screening Trial , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[6]  Hans Garmo,et al.  Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  David Gillatt,et al.  10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  T. Tammela,et al.  Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up , 2014, The Lancet.

[9]  J. Kaprio,et al.  Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  J. Sterne,et al.  Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical Trial , 2018, JAMA.

[12]  F. Hamdy,et al.  Measuring the psychosocial impact of population‐based prostate‐specific antigen testing for prostate cancer in the UK , 2006, BJU international.

[13]  L. Holmberg,et al.  Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[14]  T. Tammela,et al.  Prostate cancer mortality in the Finnish randomized screening trial. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  J. Gohagan,et al.  Extended mortality results for prostate cancer screening in the PLCO trial with median follow‐up of 15 years , 2017, Cancer.

[16]  M. Cooperberg,et al.  Trends in Management for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer, 1990-2013. , 2015, JAMA.

[17]  J. Hugosson,et al.  Opportunistic testing versus organized prostate-specific antigen screening: outcome after 18 years in the Göteborg randomized population-based prostate cancer screening trial. , 2015, European urology.

[18]  T. Wilt,et al.  Follow‐up of Prostatectomy versus Observation for Early Prostate Cancer , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  V. Moyer,et al.  Screening for Prostate Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  David Chia,et al.  Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  D. Bates,et al.  The impact of a suspicious prostate biopsy on patients’ psychological, socio-behavioral, and medical care outcomes , 2006, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[22]  Ahmedin Jemal,et al.  Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975‐2012, featuring the increasing incidence of liver cancer , 2016, Cancer.

[23]  M. Roobol,et al.  Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program. , 2002, Urology.

[24]  Anssi Auvinen,et al.  Screening for prostate cancer decreases the risk of developing metastatic disease: findings from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). , 2012, European urology.

[25]  S. Freedland,et al.  Five-year downstream outcomes following prostate-specific antigen screening in older men. , 2013, JAMA internal medicine.

[26]  Mohammad Hassan Murad,et al.  Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[27]  T. Tammela,et al.  False-positive screening results in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[28]  H. Parnes,et al.  Mortality and complications after prostate biopsy in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening (PLCO) trial , 2014, BJU international.

[29]  H. Bang,et al.  Prostate-Specific Antigen–Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force , 2018, JAMA.

[30]  David Gillatt,et al.  Patient-Reported Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  The effect of study arm on prostate cancer treatment in the large screening trial ERSPC , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[32]  Timothy J Wilt,et al.  Prevention and early detection of prostate cancer. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[33]  M. Tonelli,et al.  Recommendations on screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test , 2014, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[34]  Chris Metcalfe,et al.  Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for cancer by prostate specific antigen: prospective evaluation within ProtecT study , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  P. Prorok,et al.  Assessing contamination and compliance in the prostate component of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial , 2010, Clinical trials.

[36]  Douglas K Owens,et al.  Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Guidance Statement From the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians , 2013, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[37]  D. Katz,et al.  Health perceptions in patients who undergo screening and workup for prostate cancer. , 2007, Urology.