Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality for the Varian cone beam computed tomography system.

PURPOSE To compare the image quality and dosimetry on the Varian cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) system between software Version 1.4.13 and Version 1.4.11 (referred to as "new" and "old" protocols, respectively, in the following text). This study investigated organ absorbed dose, total effective dose, and image quality of the CBCT system for the head-and-neck and pelvic regions. METHODS AND MATERIALS A calibrated Farmer chamber and two standard cylindrical Perspex CT dosimetry phantoms with diameter of 16 cm (head phantom) and 32 cm (body phantom) were used to measure the weighted cone-beam computed tomography dose index (CBCTDIw) of the Varian CBCT system. The absorbed dose of different organs was measured in a female anthropomorphic phantom with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) and the total effective dose was estimated according to International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 103. The dose measurement and image quality were studied for head-and-neck and pelvic regions, and comparison was made between the new and old protocols. RESULTS The values of the new CBCTDIw head-and-neck and pelvic protocols were 36.6 and 29.4 mGy, respectively. The total effective doses from the new head-and-neck and pelvic protocols were 1.7 and 8.2 mSv, respectively. The absorbed doses of lens for the new 200° and old 360° head-and-neck protocols were 3.8 and 59.4 mGy, respectively. The additional secondary cancer risk from daily CBCT might be up to 2.8%. CONCLUSIONS The new Varian CBCT provided volumetric information for image guidance with acceptable image quality and lower radiation dose. This imaging tool gave a better standard for patient daily setup verification.

[1]  Mark Oldham,et al.  Cone-beam-CT guided radiation therapy: A model for on-line application. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  Wolfgang Birkfellner,et al.  Image quality and stability of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) devices: A comparative study. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  R. Harrison,et al.  Organ doses from prostate radiotherapy and associated concomitant exposures. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  Sabee Molloi,et al.  Effect of area x-ray beam equalization on image quality and dose in digital mammography. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Lars Herrnsdorf,et al.  Absorbed dose and dose rate using the Varian OBI 1.3 and 1.4 CBCT system , 2009, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[6]  Peter Remeijer,et al.  Adaptive radiotherapy for invasive bladder cancer: a feasibility study. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  A. Bos.  High sensitivity thermoluminescence dosimetry , 2001 .

[8]  E. Hall,et al.  Radiobiology for the Radiologist, 6th Edition , 2006 .

[9]  T. Kron,et al.  Simple methods to reduce patient dose in a Varian cone beam CT system for delivery verification in pelvic radiotherapy. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  M. Oldham,et al.  Cone-beam-CT guided radiation therapy: technical implementation. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Christopher J Moore,et al.  A feasibility study for image guided radiotherapy using low dose, high speed, cone beam X-ray volumetric imaging. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[13]  Jean Pouliot,et al.  Physical performance and image optimization of megavoltage cone-beam CT. , 2009, Medical physics.

[14]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  J. Ravenel.  The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd ed. , 2003 .

[16]  T. Marchant,et al.  Imaging doses from the Elekta Synergy X-ray cone beam CT system. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  Parag J. Parikh,et al.  MO‐D‐I‐611‐06: Reduction of Motion Blurring Artifact Using Respiratory Gated CT: A Quantitative Evaluation , 2005 .

[18]  G Starkschall,et al.  Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  Bo Lu,et al.  Deep-inspiration breath-hold kilovoltage cone-beam CT for setup of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung tumors: initial experience. , 2007, Lung cancer.

[20]  S M Seltzer,et al.  AAPM protocol for 40-300 kV x-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology. , 2001, Medical physics.

[21]  D. Hallahan,et al.  A study on adaptive IMRT treatment planning using kV cone-beam CT. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  C Duzenli,et al.  Image noise in X-ray CT polymer gel dosimetry , 2004 .

[23]  J. Bushberg.  The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging , 2001 .

[24]  J Wong,et al.  Setup error in radiotherapy: on-line correction using electronic kilovoltage and megavoltage radiographs. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  H. O. Wyckoff,et al.  The International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements , 2001, Journal of the ICRU.

[26]  L. J. Sawyer,et al.  Estimation of organ and effective doses resulting from cone beam CT imaging for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2009, The British journal of radiology.

[27]  Icru.  Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy , 1993 .

[28]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Advances in image-guided radiation therapy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  C Clifton Ling,et al.  High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  D A Jaffray,et al.  A radiographic and tomographic imaging system integrated into a medical linear accelerator for localization of bone and soft-tissue targets. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  Adrian K. Dixon,et al.  Benefits and costs, an eternal balance , 2007 .

[32]  Nelson Lam,et al.  Radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  R. Vetter.  ICRP Publication 103, The Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 2008 .

[34]  Francis R Verdun,et al.  Effect of X-ray Tube Parameters, Iodine Concentration, and Patient Size on Image Quality in Pulmonary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Chest-Phantom-Study , 2008, Investigative radiology.

[35]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[36]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization. , 2000, Medical physics.

[37]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[38]  J. Hendry,et al.  Radiobiology for the Radiologist , 1979, British Journal of Cancer.

[39]  P Okunieff,et al.  Radiation dose-response of human tumors. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[40]  P. Munro,et al.  A review of electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs). , 1992, Medical physics.

[41]  J. O’Sullivan,et al.  MO‐D‐I‐611‐07: The Influence of Bowtie Filters On X‐Ray CT Signals , 2005 .

[42]  Shuichi Ozawa,et al.  A dose comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems. , 2008, Medical physics.

[43]  Lingyun Chen,et al.  Reduction in x-ray scatter and radiation dose for volume-of-interest (VOI) cone-beam breast CT--a phantom study. , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  Rebecca Fahrig,et al.  Dose and image quality for a cone-beam C-arm CT system. , 2006, Medical physics.

[45]  Michael G Herman,et al.  Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and electronic portal imaging. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.