Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia.

OBJECTIVE To determine the adverse event (AE) rate for surgical patients in Australia. DESIGN A two-stage retrospective medical record review was conducted to determine the occurrence of AEs in hospital admissions. Medical records were screened for 18 criteria and positive records were reviewed by two medical officers using a structured questionnaire. SETTING Admissions in 1992 to 28 randomly selected hospitals in Australia. STUDY PARTICIPANTS Five hundred and twenty eligible admissions were randomly selected from in-patient database in each hospital. A total of 14,179 medical records were reviewed, with 8747 medical and 5432 surgical admissions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Measures included the rate of AEs in surgical and medical admissions, the proportion resulting in permanent disability and death, the proportion determined to be highly preventable, and the identification of risk factors associated with AEs. RESULTS The AE rate for surgical admissions was 21.9%. Disability that was resolved within 12 months occurred in 83%, 13% had permanent disability, and 4% resulted in death. Reviewers found that 48% of AEs were highly preventable. The risk of an AE depended on the procedure and increased with age and length of stay. CONCLUSION The high AE rate for surgical procedures supports the need for monitoring and intervention strategies. The 18 screening criteria provide a tool to identify admissions with a greater risk of a surgical AE. Risk factors for an AE were age and procedure, and these should be assessed prior to surgery. Prophylactic interventions for infection and deep vein thrombosis could reduce the occurrence of AEs in hospitals.

[1]  E. Schimmel.  The hazards of hospitalization* , 2003, Annals of internal medicine.

[2]  P M Gertman,et al.  Iatrogenic illness on a general medical service at a university hospital* , 1981, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[3]  Nicholas L. Tilney,et al.  The high cost of low-frequency events: the anatomy and economics of surgical mishaps. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  R. J. Coffey,et al.  Transforming healthcare organizations : how to achieve and sustain organizational excellence , 1991 .

[5]  T. Brennan,et al.  INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS , 2008 .

[6]  A. Rosen,et al.  Postoperative Adverse Events of Common Surgical Procedures in the Medicare Population , 1992, Medical care.

[7]  J. Feinglass,et al.  Iatrogenic complications in high-risk, elderly patients. , 1992, Archives of internal medicine.

[8]  L L Leape,et al.  Preventing medical injury. , 1993, QRB. Quality review bulletin.

[9]  W. J. Russell,et al.  Errors, Incidents and Accidents in Anaesthetic Practice , 1993 .

[10]  P. Myles,et al.  Analysis of demographic characteristics. , 1994, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[11]  K. Svärdsudd,et al.  Peroperative and immediate postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing elective general and orthopaedic surgery: The Gothenburg study of perioperative risk (PROPER). Part II , 1995, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[12]  J Gibbs,et al.  The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[13]  R. Gibberd,et al.  The Quality in Australian Health Care Study , 1995, The Medical journal of Australia.

[14]  L. Andrews,et al.  An alternative strategy for studying adverse events in medical care , 1997, The Lancet.

[15]  M García-Martín,et al.  Proportion of hospital deaths associated with adverse events. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  L. Leape.  A systems analysis approach to medical error. , 1997, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[17]  D M Berwick.  You cannot expect people to be heroes. , 1998, BMJ.

[18]  Medical abortion still not available in most countries , 1999, BMJ.

[19]  J Smith.  Study into medical errors planned for the UK , 1999, BMJ.

[20]  L L Leape,et al.  Reducing errors in medicine , 1999, Quality in health care : QHC.

[21]  A. Gawande,et al.  The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. , 1999, Surgery.

[22]  L L Leape,et al.  Institute of Medicine medical error figures are not exaggerated. , 2000, JAMA.

[23]  D M Berwick,et al.  The Institute of Medicine report on medical errors. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  C J McDonald,et al.  Deaths due to medical errors are exaggerated in Institute of Medicine report. , 2000, JAMA.

[25]  T. Brennan,et al.  Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. , 2000, Medical care.

[26]  Finding common ground in the measurement of adverse events. , 2000, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[27]  W B Runciman,et al.  A comparison of iatrogenic injury studies in Australia and the USA. II: Reviewer behaviour and quality of care. , 2000, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[28]  W B Runciman,et al.  A comparison of iatrogenic injury studies in Australia and the USA. I: Context, methods, casemix, population, patient and hospital characteristics. , 2000, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[29]  L. Kohn,et al.  To Err Is Human : Building a Safer Health System , 2007 .

[30]  T A Brennan,et al.  The Institute of Medicine report on medical errors--could it do harm? , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  R. Hayward,et al.  Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. , 2001, JAMA.

[32]  Peter Davis,et al.  Adverse Events in New Zealand Public Hospitals: Principal Findings from a National Survey , 2003 .