The Impacts of Program Goal Ambiguity on Inter-team Integrative Conflict Management during IT Program Implementation: Theory of Controversy

Program management is suited to reduce ambiguity, which is when large numbers of possible solutions and stakeholders present no clear path to defined business goals. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of program goal ambiguity on inter-team integrative conflict management during IT program implementation. Specifically, we probe the moderating role of goal ambiguity on the relationships among goal interdependence, integrative conflict management and program performance achievement. Based on the results with 120 IT programs, our findings confirm goal interdependence has positive influence on integrative conflict management, which in turn to influence program performance achievement positively and goal ambiguity has significant moderating effects.

[1]  Jack Shih-Chieh Hsu,et al.  Promoting the Integration of Users and Developers to Achieve a Collective Mind through the Screening of Information System Projects , 2011 .

[2]  M. Afzalur Rahim,et al.  Theory and Research in Conflict Management , 1990 .

[3]  James T. Brown,et al.  The Handbook of Program Management: How to Facilitate Project Success with Optimal Program Management , 2007 .

[4]  Sergio Pellegrinelli,et al.  Programme management: organising project-based change , 1997 .

[5]  Gary Klein,et al.  User commitment and collaboration: Motivational antecedents and project performance , 2010, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[6]  Sanjay K. Pandey,et al.  Public Managers' Perceptions of Organizational Goal Ambiguity: Analyzing Alternative Models , 2006 .

[7]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  Goals Gone Wild: The Systematic Side Effects of Overprescribing Goal Setting , 2009 .

[8]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[9]  Gary Klein,et al.  Achieving IT Program Goals with Integrative Conflict Management , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making: Antecedents to Effective Self-Managing Teams. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[11]  Peter Mykytyn,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Collaborative Conflict Management Style in Group Support System-Based Global Virtual Teams , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research , 1989 .

[13]  E. A. Locke,et al.  A theory of goal setting & task performance , 1990 .

[14]  H. Rainey,et al.  Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in U.S. Federal Agencies , 2005 .

[15]  Robert P. Bostrom,et al.  The Impact of Group Support Systems on Group Conflict and Conflict Management , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[17]  M. S. Poole,et al.  Decision Development in Small Groups V: Test of a Contingency Model. , 1989 .

[18]  D. Tjosvold.  The conflict‐positive organization: it depends upon us , 2008 .

[19]  Irwin Epstein,et al.  Management by Measurement:: Organizational Dilemmas and Opportunities , 1988 .

[20]  Peter T. Coleman,et al.  The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[21]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[22]  Varun Grover,et al.  Recognizing the politics of MIS , 1988, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Gary Klein,et al.  Software Quality as Influenced by Informational Diversity, Task Conflict, and Learning in Project Teams , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[24]  Karl A. Smith,et al.  Constructive Controversy: The Educative Power of Intellectual Conflict , 2000 .

[25]  H. Gemünden,et al.  Foundations of program management: A bibliometric view , 2009 .

[26]  Gary Klein,et al.  Reducing software requirement perception gaps through coordination mechanisms , 2009, J. Syst. Softw..

[27]  Mark Hall,et al.  Exploring reliability in information systems programmes , 2011 .

[28]  A. Somech.  Managing Conflict in School Teams: The Impact of Task and Goal Interdependence on Conflict Management and Team Effectiveness , 2008 .

[29]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Goal setting, planning, and organizational performance: An experimental simulation , 1990 .

[30]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[31]  R. Müller,et al.  Choosing Appropriate Project Managers: Matching their Leadership Style to the Type of Project , 2006 .

[32]  David W. Johnson,et al.  New Developments in Social Interdependence Theory , 2005, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[33]  HoeglMartin,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[34]  Gary Klein,et al.  Software development risks to project effectiveness , 2000, J. Syst. Softw..

[35]  Henri Barki,et al.  Interpersonal Conflict and Its Management in Information System Development , 2001, MIS Q..

[36]  Gary Klein,et al.  The contribution of resource interdependence to IT program performance: A social interdependence perspective , 2011 .

[37]  Onne Janssen,et al.  How Task and Person Conflict Shape the Role of Positive Interdependence in Management Teams , 1999 .

[38]  Mirko Noordegraaf,et al.  Management by Measurement? Public Management Practices Amidst Ambiguity , 2003 .

[39]  Andrea Bartoli,et al.  The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice , 2006 .