The quality of written peer feedback on undergraduates’ draft answers to an assignment, and the use made of the feedback

The research described here investigated the quality and characteristics of peer feedback given on a draft piece of writing in the context of an undergraduate summative assignment. It also investigated whether the recipients made use of the feedback, with the aim of discovering whether some types of feedback were used in preference to others. The peer feedback was characterised in various ways, and then a comparison with the feedback subsequently given on the polished piece of writing by the tutor was used to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the peer feedback. Although the peers’ feedback had some different characteristics from that of the tutors, it was nevertheless of good quality. The examination of the use the recipients made of the feedback showed that much feedback was ignored. The use recipients made of the feedback depended very little on the characteristics of the feedback received, but did vary strongly across the recipients. The ability level of the recipients was not found to be a factor in this variation. The results of this research suggest that future work needs to focus more on students using feedback than on students giving feedback.

[1]  U. Wingate.  The impact of formative feedback on the development of academic writing , 2010 .

[2]  Susan Bloxham,et al.  Learning to write in higher education: students’ perceptions of an intervention in developing understanding of assessment criteria , 2007 .

[3]  Young Hoan Cho,et al.  Peer reviewers learn from giving comments , 2011 .

[4]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work , 2011 .

[5]  N. Falchikov.  Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment , 1995 .

[6]  S. Hanrahan,et al.  Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students' views , 2001 .

[7]  Mirabelle Walker,et al.  An investigation into written comments on assignments: do students find them usable? , 2009 .

[8]  R. Higgins,et al.  The Conscientious Consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning , 2002 .

[9]  C. Reich.  Peer assessment. , 1985, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[10]  D. Carless,et al.  Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment , 2006 .

[11]  Avril Thomson,et al.  Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective , 2014 .

[12]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? , 2010 .

[13]  Kwangsu Cho,et al.  Learning by reviewing , 2011 .

[14]  Paul Orsmond *,et al.  Implementation of a formative assessment model incorporating peer and self‐assessment , 2004 .

[15]  Mike Truman,et al.  Are the principles of effective feedback transferable across disciplines? A comparative study of written assignment feedback in Languages and Technology , 2013 .

[16]  Patricia Cartney,et al.  Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used , 2010 .

[17]  Neil Duncan,et al.  ‘Feed‐forward’: improving students' use of tutors' comments , 2007 .

[18]  Evelyn Brown,et al.  Evaluating written feedback , 2006 .

[19]  C. Patton.  ‘Some kind of weird, evil experiment’: student perceptions of peer assessment , 2012 .

[20]  Agnes M. Rae,et al.  Listening to students , 2008 .

[21]  Karen Handley,et al.  Feedback: focusing attention on engagement , 2011 .

[22]  B. Crisp.  Is it worth the effort? How feedback influences students’ subsequent submission of assessable work , 2007 .

[23]  C. MacArthur,et al.  Student revision with peer and expert reviewing , 2010 .

[24]  Lan Li,et al.  Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..