Non contact method for in vivo assessment of skin mechanical properties for assessing effect of ageing.

The assessment of human tissue properties by objective and quantitative devices is very important to improve the understanding of its mechanical behaviour. The aim of this paper is to present a non contact method to measure the mechanical properties of human skin in vivo. A complete non contact device using an air flow system has been developed. Validation and assessment of the method have been performed on inert visco-elastic material. An in vivo study on the forearm of two groups of healthy women aged of 23.2±1.6 and 60.4±2.4 has been performed. Main parameters assessed are presented and a first interpretation to evaluate the reduced Young's modulus is proposed. Significant differences between the main parameters of the curve are shown with ageing. As tests were performed with different loads, the influence of the stress is also observed. We found a reduced Young's modulus with an air flow force of 10 mN of 14.38±3.61 kPa for the youngest group and 6.20±1.45 kPa for the oldest group. These values agree with other studies using classical or dynamic indentation. Non contact test using the developed device gives convincing results.

[1]  N. Dursun,et al.  The effects of ovariectomy on the mechanical properties of skin in rats. , 2002, Maturitas.

[2]  P. Grigg,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of skin in Mov-13 and Tsk mice. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  J. Lévêque,et al.  Mechanical properties and Young's modulus of human skin in vivo , 2004, Archives of Dermatological Research.

[4]  J C Bamber,et al.  Ultrasonic propagation properties of excised human skin. , 1995, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  A. Le Bot,et al.  Dynamic indentation on human skin in vivo: ageing effects , 2009, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[6]  J. K. Rappel,et al.  New extensometer to measure in vivo uniaxial mechanical properties of human skin. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  M. Fink,et al.  Assessment of elastic parameters of human skin using dynamic elastography , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  C Pailler-Mattei,et al.  A new approach to describe the skin surface physical properties in vivo. , 2009, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[9]  R. Sanders,et al.  Torsional elasticity of human skin in vivo , 1973, Pflügers Archiv.

[10]  J. Lagarde,et al.  Skin ageing: changes of physical properties of human skin in vivo , 2001, International journal of cosmetic science.

[11]  H. Zahouani,et al.  In vivo measurements of the elastic mechanical properties of human skin by indentation tests. , 2008, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  K. Kendall,et al.  Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[13]  F. Foster,et al.  Ultrasonic and viscoelastic properties of skin under transverse mechanical stress in vitro. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  H. Zahouani,et al.  Study of adhesion forces and mechanical properties of human skin in vivo , 2004 .

[15]  Cwj Cees Oomens,et al.  A numerical‐experimental method to characterize the non‐linear mechanical behaviour of human skin , 2003, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[16]  H. Schlichting.  Boundary Layer Theory , 1955 .

[17]  J. Georges,et al.  Vickers Indentation Curves of Magnesium Oxide (MgO) , 1984 .

[18]  I. N. Sneddon.  The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile , 1965 .

[19]  Osamu Osanai,et al.  Development of a novel method to measure the elastic properties of skin including subcutaneous tissue: New age‐related parameters and scope of application , 2008, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[20]  H I Maibach,et al.  In vivo biophysical characterization of skin physiological differences in races. , 1991, Dermatologica.

[21]  Olivier Sire,et al.  Introducing the scanning air puff tonometer for biological studies. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  H. Zahouani,et al.  Interpretation of the human skin biotribological behaviour after tape stripping , 2011, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[23]  J. Jachowicz,et al.  Indentometric analysis of in vivo skin and comparison with artificial skin models , 2007, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[24]  H Alexander,et al.  Accounting for natural tension in the mechanical testing of human skin. , 1977, The Journal of investigative dermatology.