Performance Appraisal, Performance Management and Improving Individual Performance: A Motivational Framework

Performance appraisal has been the focus of considerable research for almost a century. Yet, this research has resulted in very few specific recommendations about designing and implementing appraisal and performance management systems whose goal is performance improvement. We believe that a reason for this is that appraisal research became too interested in measurement issues and not interested enough in ways to improve performance, although some recent trends in the area have begun moving the field in the right direction. We review these trends and their genesis, and propose a motivational framework as a means of integrating what we have learned and generating proposals for future research that focus on employee's performance improvement.

[1]  E. Thorndike A constant error in psychological ratings. , 1920 .

[2]  P. Levy,et al.  The Social Context of Performance Appraisal: A Review and Framework for the Future , 2004 .

[3]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Toward Narrowing the Research-Practice Gap in Performance Appraisal. , 1985 .

[4]  Lisa A. Steelman,et al.  The Feedback Environment Scale: Construct Definition, Measurement, and Validation , 2004 .

[5]  James W. Smither Performance appraisal : state of the art in practice , 1998 .

[6]  Paul E. Spector Perceived Control by Employees: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Concerning Autonomy and Participation at Work , 1986 .

[7]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Impact of management by objectives on organizational productivity. , 1991 .

[8]  Judith M. Collins,et al.  Jackson and Schuler (1985) Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of the Relationships Between Role Ambiguity, Role Conflict, and Job Performance , 2000 .

[9]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  MULTIPLE ASSESSMENT OF MANAGERIAL EFFECTIVENESS: INTERRATER AGREEMENT AND CONSENSUS IN EFFECTIVENESS MODELS , 1988 .

[10]  Gregory B. Northcraft,et al.  Impact of Process and Outcome Feedback on the Relation of Goal Setting to Task Performance. , 1989 .

[11]  D. J. Abramis Work Role Ambiguity, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance: Meta-Analyses and Review , 1994 .

[12]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[13]  Marvin D. Dunnette,et al.  A note on the criterion. , 1963 .

[14]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-Based Perspectives , 1995 .

[15]  James L. Farr,et al.  1 Performance Rating , 2007 .

[16]  J. Brockner,et al.  An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system , 1996 .

[18]  K. Murphy Personnel Selection in Organizations , 1992 .

[19]  L. H. Peters,et al.  Situational Constraints and Work Outcomes: The Influences Of a Frequently Overlooked Construct , 1980 .

[20]  C. Orpen,et al.  Interactive effects of work motivation and personal control on employee job performance and satisfaction. , 1994, The Journal of social psychology.

[21]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Motivation and performance management , 2008 .

[22]  Michael M. Harris Rater Motivation in the Performance Appraisal Context: A Theoretical Framework , 1994 .

[23]  Michael Beer,et al.  A Performance Management System: Research, Design, Introduction, and Evaluation , 1978 .

[24]  Herbert H. Meyer,et al.  Split Roles in Performance Appraisal , 1981 .

[25]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  THE EVALUATION OF AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO MEASURING ORGANIZATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY , 1989 .

[26]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  Research Notes: Interpersonal Affect and Rating Errors , 1986 .

[27]  Kenneth G. Brown,et al.  Seven common misconceptions about human resource practices: Research findings versus practitioner beliefs , 2002 .

[28]  H. John Bernardin,et al.  Effects of rater training: Creating new response sets and decreasing accuracy. , 1980 .

[29]  J. Colquitt On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  D. Ilgen,et al.  A Theory of Behavior in Organizations , 1980 .

[31]  Pc Earley,et al.  New perspectives on work performance: Merging motivation and cognition , 1991 .

[32]  Kenneth M. Alvares,et al.  Behavioral expectation scales: Effects of developmental procedures and formats. , 1976 .

[33]  Walter W. Tornow,et al.  Perceptions or reality: Is multi-perspective measurement a means or an end? , 1993 .

[34]  D. R. Ilgen,et al.  Performance Appraisal Process Research in the 1980s: What Has It Contributed to Appraisals in Use? , 1993 .

[35]  William K. Balzer,et al.  Rater errors and rating accuracy. , 1989 .

[36]  G. Yukl,et al.  Effects of multisource feedback and a feedback facilitator on the influence behavior of managers toward subordinates. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. , 1989 .

[38]  M. D. Dunnette Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[39]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Productivity in Organizations , 1995 .

[40]  M. Rotundo The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: a policy-capturing approach. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  M. Taylor,et al.  Due Process in Performance Appraisal: A Quasi-Experiment in Procedural Justice , 1995 .

[42]  David A. Waldman,et al.  Has 360 degree feedback gone amok , 1998 .

[43]  Mary Jenkins,et al.  Abolishing Performance Appraisals: Why They Backfire and What to Do Instead , 2000 .

[44]  Kay Tracy,et al.  Managers' reactions to procedurally just performance management systems , 1998 .

[45]  A. Kluger,et al.  Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? , 2000 .

[46]  Jack J. Phillips,et al.  The Human Resources Scorecard: Measuring the Return on Investment , 2001 .

[47]  James W. Smither,et al.  Are the characteristics of narrative comments related to improvement in multirater feedback ratings over time? , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  Philip Bobko,et al.  EMPLOYEE REACTIONS TO PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: A REVIEW AND RESEARCH PROPOSITIONS , 1994 .

[49]  P. Drucker,et al.  管理的实践=The practice of management , 1954 .

[50]  Angelo S. DeNisi,et al.  A cognitive approach to performance appraisal : a program of research , 1996 .

[51]  E. Lawler,et al.  The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[52]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Joint venture dissolution as corporate divorce , 2002 .

[53]  R. Bies Interactional justice : communication criteria of fairness , 1986 .

[54]  A. Kluger,et al.  The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. , 1996 .

[55]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Criterion issues in performance appraisal research: Behavioral accuracy versus classification accuracy. , 1991 .

[56]  Richard W. Beatty,et al.  360‐degree feedback as a competitive advantage , 1993 .

[57]  H. John Bernardin,et al.  Performance appraisal : assessing human behavior at work , 1984 .

[58]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments. , 1987 .

[59]  R. Kanfer Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. , 1990 .

[60]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  IMPACT OF PROCESS AND OUTCOME FEEDBACK ON THE RELATION OF GOAL SETTING TO TASK PERFORMANCE , 1990 .

[61]  H. John Bernardin,et al.  Strategies in Rater Training , 1981 .

[62]  Allen I. Huffcutt,et al.  Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. , 1997 .

[63]  David V. Day,et al.  Effects of frame-of-reference training and information configuration on memory organization and rating accuracy. , 1995 .

[64]  John W. Boudreau,et al.  How leading companies create, measure and achieve strategic results through “line of sight” , 2001 .

[65]  William K. Balzer,et al.  Meaning and measurement of performance rating accuracy: Some methodological and theoretical concerns. , 1988 .

[66]  Anne S. Tsui,et al.  A Multiple-Constituency Model of Effectiveness: An Empirical Examination at the Human Resource Subunit Level. , 1990 .

[67]  Manuel London,et al.  Maximizing the Value of 360-degree Feedback: A Process for Successful Individual and Organizational Development , 1998 .

[68]  C. Cooper,et al.  International review of industrial and organizational psychology , 1986 .

[69]  James A. Breaugh,et al.  Measuring facets of job ambiguity: Construct validity evidence. , 1994 .

[70]  James L. Farr,et al.  Personnel selection and assessment : individual and organizational perspectives , 1993 .

[71]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Expectancy models of job satisfaction, occupational preference and effort: A theoretical, methodological, and empirical appraisal. , 1974 .

[72]  Marvin D. Dunnette,et al.  The Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. , 1978 .

[73]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.