Improving SMEs' Service Innovation Performance in the Face of Uncertainty Through IT Ambidexterity: A Configurational Approach

Taking a configurational approach, this paper investigates the causal configurations of IT ambidexterity, dynamic capabilities, and environmental uncertainty that are associated to service innovation performance in SMEs. Results from a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of 63 industrial service SMEs show that these firms attain service innovation performance when they dispose of an IT capability for exploration, accompanied by an IT capability for exploitation in one configuration, whereas the IT capability for exploitation is absent in other configurations. These results also support the implications of the configurational approach: different configurations of the three elements equally lead to service innovation performance, the same element can both enable or inhibit service innovation performance, configurations leading to the outcome are different than those leading to its absence, and configurations might show different permutations of peripheral conditions. Such results are discussed in light of the current literature and implications for research and practice are explained.

[1]  L. Raymond,et al.  IT-enabled Knowledge Management for the Competitive Performance of Manufacturing SMEs: An Absorptive Capacity-based View , 2016 .

[2]  G. Sánchez-Marín,et al.  Strategic Orientation, Management Characteristics, and Performance: A Study of Spanish SMEs , 2005 .

[3]  Cengiz Yılmaz,et al.  INNOVATIVE CAPABILITY, INNOVATION STRATEGY AND MARKET ORIENTATION: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS IN TURKISH SOFTWARE INDUSTRY , 2008 .

[4]  Fethi Calisir,et al.  A Scale Development for Innovation Capability Measurement , 2017 .

[5]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda , 2007 .

[6]  Arun Rai,et al.  Intermediate Performance Impacts of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Systems: An Empirical Investigation* , 1999 .

[7]  Danny Miller,et al.  Notes on the Study of Configurations , 1999 .

[8]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Strategic capability configurations for the internationalization of SMEs: A study in equifinality , 2013 .

[9]  C. Gelhard,et al.  IT infrastructure and competitive aggressiveness in explaining and predicting performance , 2016 .

[10]  Sandra Lowe,et al.  Redesigning Social Inquiry Fuzzy Sets And Beyond , 2016 .

[11]  Jane Webster,et al.  Combining variance and process in information systems research: Hybrid approaches , 2017, Inf. Organ..

[12]  Amir Pezeshkan,et al.  An empirical assessment of the dynamic capabilities–performance relationship , 2016 .

[13]  Vassilis Kostakos,et al.  Applying configurational analysis to IS behavioural research: a methodological alternative for modelling combinatorial complexities , 2017, Inf. Syst. J..

[14]  James N. Baron,et al.  Inertia and Change in the Early Years: Employment Relations in Young, High Technology Firms , 1996 .

[15]  A. Tsui,et al.  Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[16]  Alberto Ferraris,et al.  The Role of External Embeddedness and Knowledge Management as Antecedents of Ambidexterity and Performances in Italian SMEs , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[17]  Anandhi S. Bharadwaj,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 2000, MIS Q..

[18]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Enabling the business strategy of SMEs through e-business capabilities: A strategic alignment perspective , 2008, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[19]  Danny Miller,et al.  Strategy from the inside Out: Building Capability-Creating Organizations , 2002 .

[20]  Renu Agarwal,et al.  Innovation in Services and its measurement at firm level: A Literature Review , 2011 .

[21]  Peer C. Fiss Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[22]  HA Henny Romijn,et al.  Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England , 2002 .

[23]  Janet R. McColl-Kennedy,et al.  Reconceptualizing professional service firm innovation capability: Scale development , 2011 .

[24]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Fuzzy-Set Social Science , 2001 .

[25]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Set Relations in Social Research: Evaluating Their Consistency and Coverage , 2006, Political Analysis.

[26]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The Basics Of Social Research , 1998 .

[27]  A. Cameron,et al.  External Relationships and the Small Business: A Review of Small Business Alliance and Network Research** , 2007 .

[28]  Jeff Baker,et al.  Strategic Alignment in SMEs: Strengthening Theoretical Foundations , 2017, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[29]  A. Woodside Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory , 2013 .

[30]  Wilko Letterie,et al.  Exploring antecedents of service innovation performance in manufacturing SMEs , 2018 .

[31]  Stephen Roper,et al.  Innovation and export performance: evidence from the UK and German manufacturing plants , 2002 .

[32]  W. Orlikowski The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research , 2010 .

[33]  Terri L. Griffith,et al.  Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Issues in Linking Information Technology Capability to Firm Performance , 2003, MIS Q..

[35]  Ralf Wilden,et al.  The Architecture of Dynamic Capability Research Identifying the Building Blocks of a Configurational Approach , 2016 .

[36]  Danny Miller,et al.  Psychological and Traditional Determinants of Structure. , 1986 .

[37]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Archetypes of Strategy Formulation , 1978 .

[38]  Yong-Hui Li,et al.  Exploitative and exploratory learning in transactive memory systems and project performance , 2013, Inf. Manag..

[39]  Kai H. Lim,et al.  How Does IT Ambidexterity Impact Organizational Agility? , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Chih-Chiang Chen,et al.  Knowledge sharing, absorptive capacity, and innovation capability: an empirical study of Taiwan's knowledge-intensive industries , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[41]  Jing Zhao,et al.  The influence of inter-firm IT governance strategies on relational performance: The moderation effect of information technology ambidexterity , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[42]  Arun Rai,et al.  Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities , 2006 .

[43]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[44]  Sebastian Forkmann,et al.  Networking capability in business relationships - Concept and scale development , 2012 .

[45]  S. Winter Understanding dynamic capabilities , 2003 .

[46]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: Contradictory Findings and Their Possible Causes , 2014, MIS Q..

[47]  R. Lennox,et al.  Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. , 1991 .

[48]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Research Commentary - Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[50]  S. Winter,et al.  Replication as Strategy , 2001 .

[51]  S. Zahra,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Dynamic Capabilities: A Review, Model and Research Agenda , 2006 .

[52]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities , 2011, Decis. Sci..

[53]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[54]  Robert Drazin,et al.  Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organization Design , 1997 .

[55]  Sunil Mithas,et al.  How Information Technology Strategy and Investments Influence Firm Performance: Conjecture and Empirical Evidence , 2016, MIS Q..

[56]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service Innovation in the Digital Age: Key Contributions and Future Directions , 2015, MIS Q..

[57]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  The Complementarity of Information Technology Infrastructure and E-Commerce Capability: A Resource-Based Assessment of Their Business Value , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[58]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Towards Verbal and Statistical Correspondence , 2018 .

[59]  Melanie Older Gray,et al.  The use and effectiveness of benchmarking in SMEs , 2001 .

[60]  Minna Saunila,et al.  Innovation capability for SME success: perspectives of financial and operational performance , 2014 .

[61]  Barry Cooper,et al.  Exploring the robustness of set theoretic findings from a large n fsQCA: an illustration from the sociology of education , 2016 .