Noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke rehabilitation

SummaryStroke is a common disorder that produces a major burden to society, largely through long-lasting motor disability in survivors. Recent studies have broadened our understanding of the processes underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Bilateral motor regions of the brain experience substantial reorganization after stroke, including changes in the strength of interhemispheric inhibitory interactions. Our understanding of the extent to which different forms of reorganization contribute to behavioral gains in the rehabilitative process, although still limited, has led to the formulation of novel interventional strategies to regain motor function. Transcranial magnetic (TMS) and DC (tDCS) electrical stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation techniques that modulate cortical excitability in both healthy individuals and stroke patients. These techniques can enhance the effect of training on performance of various motor tasks, including those that mimic activities of daily living. This review looks at the effects of TMS and tDCS on motor cortical function and motor performance in healthy volunteers and in patients with stroke. Both techniques can either enhance or suppress cortical excitability, and may move to the clinical arena as strategies to enhance the beneficial effects of customarily used neurorehabilitative treatments after stroke.

[1]  B. Demaerschalk,et al.  Economic Benefit of Increasing Utilization of Intravenous Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the United States , 2005, Stroke.

[2]  C. Wright,et al.  Ataxic Hemiparesis From Strategic Frontal White Matter Infarction With Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis , 2006, Stroke.

[3]  P. Manganotti,et al.  Motor disinhibition in affected and unaffected hemisphere in the early period of recovery after stroke , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  M. Rizzo,et al.  Bilateral effects of unilateral visual cortex lesions in human. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  R. Nudo,et al.  Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  M. Hallett,et al.  Motor cortex excitability in patients with cerebellar degeneration , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  W. Paulus,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Christian Gerloff,et al.  The Role of Multiple Contralesional Motor Areas for Complex Hand Movements after Internal Capsular Lesion , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  S. Hesse,et al.  Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  M. Hallett,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation–Induced Corticomotor Excitability and Associated Motor Skill Acquisition in Chronic Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[12]  Karl Herholz,et al.  Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Acute Human Stroke: A PET Study of Serial Changes and Response to Supratentorial Reperfusion , 2005, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[13]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Treatment Interventions for the Paretic Upper Limb of Stroke Survivors: A Critical Review , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[14]  T. Bliss,et al.  Long‐lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  L. Cohen,et al.  Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. , 2004, Postgraduate medical journal.

[16]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  The influence of low-level transcortical DC-currents on response speed in humans. , 1981, The International journal of neuroscience.

[17]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Ipsilateral motor cortex activation on functional magnetic resonance imaging during unilateral hand movements is related to interhemispheric interactions , 2003, NeuroImage.

[18]  M. D. Egger,et al.  Formation of New Connexions in Adult Rat Brains after Partial Deafferentation , 1971, Nature.

[19]  Jeffrey A. Lewis,et al.  The Rutgers Arm, a Rehabilitation System in Virtual Reality: A Pilot Study , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[20]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. , 2000, Stroke.

[21]  S. Sato,et al.  Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals , 2005, Neurology.

[22]  R L Hewer,et al.  Arm function after stroke. An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. , 1989, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[23]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  Ichiro Watanabe,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Contralesional Primary Motor Cortex Improves Hand Function After Stroke , 2005, Stroke.

[25]  T. Elbert,et al.  New treatments in neurorehabiliation founded on basic research , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  G. Kraft,et al.  Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  D. Perani,et al.  A PET Follow-up Study of Recovery after Stroke in Acute Aphasics , 1997, Brain and Language.

[28]  P. Rossini,et al.  Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain , 2003, The Lancet Neurology.

[29]  S. Rosen,et al.  Transcortical polarization: facilitation of delayed response performance by monkeys. , 1972, Experimental neurology.

[30]  P M Field,et al.  A quantitative investigation of the development of collateral reinnervation after partial deafferentation of the septal nuclei. , 1973, Brain research.

[31]  C Xerri,et al.  Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Facilitation of Implicit Motor Learning by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex in the Human , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation over V5 Enhances Visuomotor Coordination by Improving Motion Perception in Humans , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Gary Dudley,et al.  Methods for a Randomized Trial of Weight-Supported Treadmill Training Versus Conventional Training for Walking During Inpatient Rehabilitation after Incomplete Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury , 2003, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[35]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Recharging cognition with DC brain polarization , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  N. Hogan,et al.  Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? , 2001, Current opinion in neurology.

[37]  N Birbaumer,et al.  The influence of low-level, event-related DC-currents during time estimation in humans. , 1981, The International journal of neuroscience.

[38]  L. Cohen,et al.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  L. Cohen,et al.  Improvement of Motor Function with Noninvasive Cortical Stimulation in a Patient with Chronic Stroke , 2005, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[40]  J. Hatazawa,et al.  Evolution of Crossed Cerebellar Diaschisis in Middle Cerebral Artery Infarction , 1994, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[41]  D. M. Feeney From laboratory to clinic: noradrenergic enhancement of physical therapy for stroke or trauma patients. , 1997, Advances in neurology.

[42]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[43]  Howard Poizner,et al.  Development and application of virtual reality technology to improve hand use and gait of individuals post-stroke. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[44]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[45]  Heidi M. Schambra,et al.  Modulation of excitability of human motor cortex (M1) by 1 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralateral M1 , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[46]  B. Bussel,et al.  Longitudinal Study of Motor Recovery After Stroke: Recruitment and Focusing of Brain Activation , 2002, Stroke.

[47]  N. Kapur Paradoxical functional facilitation in brain-behaviour research. A critical review. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  M. Hommel,et al.  Vicarious function within the human primary motor cortex? A longitudinal fMRI stroke study. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[49]  Robert Chen,et al.  Interactions between inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  Francine Malouin,et al.  A Treadmill and Motion Coupled Virtual Reality System for Gait Training Post-Stroke , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[51]  J. Whitall,et al.  Repetitive Bilateral Arm Training With Rhythmic Auditory Cueing Improves Motor Function in Chronic Hemiparetic Stroke , 2000, Stroke.

[52]  S. Eksborg,et al.  Drugs for Stroke Recovery , 2004, Drugs & aging.

[53]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[54]  P L Weiss,et al.  Interactive virtual environment training for safe street crossing of right hemisphere stroke patients with Unilateral Spatial Neglect , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[55]  B. Meyer,et al.  Inhibitory and excitatory interhemispheric transfers between motor cortical areas in normal humans and patients with abnormalities of the corpus callosum. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  M. Bear,et al.  Synaptic plasticity: LTP and LTD , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[57]  J. Krakauer Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[58]  J. Hopper,et al.  Crossed cerebellar diaschisis and brain recovery after stroke. , 1995, Stroke.

[59]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neurology.

[60]  S. Swinnen Intermanual coordination: From behavioural principles to neural-network interactions , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[61]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and stroke: A computer-based human model study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[62]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[63]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neuroreport.

[64]  Stanley Finger,et al.  The Monakow concept of diaschisis: origins and perspectives. , 2004, Archives of neurology.

[65]  C. Calautti,et al.  Sequential activation brain mapping after subcortical stroke: changes in hemispheric balance and recovery , 2001, Neuroreport.

[66]  S. Hesse,et al.  Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control , 2003, Current opinion in neurology.

[67]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[68]  R. Nudo,et al.  Neural Substrates for the Effects of Rehabilitative Training on Motor Recovery After Ischemic Infarct , 1996, Science.

[69]  H. Freund,et al.  The role of diaschisis in stroke recovery. , 1999, Stroke.

[70]  P. Pasqualetti,et al.  Interhemispheric Asymmetries of Motor Cortex Excitability in the Postacute Stroke Stage: A Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2003, Stroke.

[71]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke , 2005, Neurology.

[72]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Motor Cortex Stimulation for the Enhancement of Recovery from Stroke: A Prospective, Multicenter Safety Study , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[73]  François Chollet,et al.  Correlation between cerebral reorganization and motor recovery after subcortical infarcts , 2003, NeuroImage.

[74]  Patrick Ragert,et al.  Improvement of Tactile Discrimination Performance and Enlargement of Cortical Somatosensory Maps after 5 Hz rTMS , 2005, PLoS biology.

[75]  M. Knapp,et al.  Costs and disability among stroke patients. , 1999, Journal of public health medicine.

[76]  L. Cohen,et al.  Reorganization of the human ipsilesional premotor cortex after stroke. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[77]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Functional MRI of the immediate impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical and subcortical motor circuits , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[78]  Gary W Thickbroom,et al.  Long-term changes in motor cortical organisation after recovery from subcortical stroke 1 1 Published on the World Wide Web on 1 December 2000. , 2001, Brain Research.

[79]  N. Hogan,et al.  Comparison of Two Techniques of Robot-Aided Upper Limb Exercise Training After Stroke , 2004, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[80]  R. Silbergleit,et al.  Economic benefit of increasing utilization of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke in the United States. , 2005, Stroke.

[81]  Christian Gerloff,et al.  Disinhibition of the contralateral motor cortex by low-frequency rTMS , 2003, Neuroreport.

[82]  P. Duncan,et al.  Measurement of Motor Recovery After Stroke: Outcome Assessment and Sample Size Requirements , 1992, Stroke.

[83]  C. Calautti,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Motor Recovery After Stroke in Adults: A Review , 2003, Stroke.

[84]  R. Edwards,et al.  Conservative management of patients with cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections. , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[85]  N. Young,et al.  Cortical stimulation improves skilled forelimb use following a focal ischemic infarct in the rat , 2003, Neurological research.

[86]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca’s area: An open-protocol study , 2005, Brain and Language.

[87]  G Schlaug,et al.  Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements , 2004, Neurology.

[88]  E. Taub,et al.  Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy: a new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation--a clinical review. , 1999, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[89]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke , 2004, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.

[90]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[91]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Facilitation of probabilistic classification learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the human , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[92]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[93]  R Langton-Hewer,et al.  The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. , 1983, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[94]  A. Luft,et al.  Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[95]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[96]  B. Knowlton,et al.  Step training with body weight support: effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on poststroke locomotor recovery. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[97]  Ann M. Stowe,et al.  Extensive Cortical Rewiring after Brain Injury , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[98]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[99]  M. Hallett,et al.  Contribution of the ipsilateral motor cortex to recovery after chronic stroke , 2003, Annals of neurology.

[100]  Charles D. Woody,et al.  Changes in membrane currents during Pavlovian conditioning of single cortical neurons , 1991, Brain Research.

[101]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Cortical rewiring and information storage , 2004, Nature.

[102]  Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen,et al.  A home-based, self-administered stimulation program to improve selected hand functions of chronic stroke. , 2003, NeuroRehabilitation.

[103]  T. Bliss Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission , 2005 .

[104]  R. H. Jebsen,et al.  An objective and standardized test of hand function. , 1969, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[105]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[106]  F. Fazio,et al.  Crossed cerebellar diaschisis in patients with cerebral ischemia assessed by SPECT and 123I-HIPDM. , 1987, European neurology.

[107]  P. Matthews,et al.  The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[108]  M. Hallett Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain , 2000, Nature.

[109]  A. Wernig,et al.  Weight-supported treadmill vs over-ground training for walking after acute incomplete SCI , 2006, Neurology.

[110]  S. Finger,et al.  Dr. Otto Soltmann (1876) on development of the motor cortex and recovery after its removal in infancy , 2000, Brain Research Bulletin.

[111]  Jacquie Kurland,et al.  Improved naming after TMS treatments in a chronic, global aphasia patient – case report , 2005, Neurocase.

[112]  B. Rosen,et al.  A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. , 1997, Stroke.

[113]  Maureen K. Holden,et al.  Virtual Environments for Motor Rehabilitation: Review , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[114]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  How does transcranial DC stimulation of the primary motor cortex alter regional neuronal activity in the human brain? , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[115]  S. Cramer,et al.  Activity in the Peri-Infarct Rim in Relation to Recovery From Stroke , 2006, Stroke.