Quorum responses and consensus decision making

Animal groups are said to make consensus decisions when group members come to agree on the same option. Consensus decisions are taxonomically widespread and potentially offer three key benefits: maintenance of group cohesion, enhancement of decision accuracy compared with lone individuals and improvement in decision speed. In the absence of centralized control, arriving at a consensus depends on local interactions in which each individual's likelihood of choosing an option increases with the number of others already committed to that option. The resulting positive feedback can effectively direct most or all group members to the best available choice. In this paper, we examine the functional form of the individual response to others' behaviour that lies at the heart of this process. We review recent theoretical and empirical work on consensus decisions, and we develop a simple mathematical model to show the central importance to speedy and accurate decisions of quorum responses, in which an animal's probability of exhibiting a behaviour is a sharply nonlinear function of the number of other individuals already performing this behaviour. We argue that systems relying on such quorum rules can achieve cohesive choice of the best option while also permitting adaptive tuning of the trade-off between decision speed and accuracy.

[1]  P. Boland.  Majority Systems and the Condorcet Jury Theorem , 1989 .

[2]  Nigel R Franks,et al.  Speed versus accuracy in decision-making ants: expediting politics and policy implementation , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Scott Camazine,et al.  Collective decisions and cognition in bees , 1999, Nature.

[4]  T. Seeley,et al.  Choosing a home: how the scouts in a honey bee swarm perceive the completion of their group decision making , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[5]  I. Janis.  Victims Of Groupthink , 1972 .

[6]  T. Seeley,et al.  Modeling and analysis of nest-site selection by honeybee swarms: the speed and accuracy trade-off , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Cockroach aggregation based on strain odour recognition , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  S. Pratt,et al.  A tunable algorithm for collective decision-making , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  F. Galton.  Vox Populi , 1907, Nature.

[10]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Group movement decisions in capuchin monkeys: The utility of an experimental study and a mathematical model to explore the relationship between individual and collective behaviours , 2007, q-bio/0702023.

[11]  S. Pratt.  Behavioral mechanisms of collective nest-site choice by the ant Temnothorax curvispinosus , 2005, Insectes Sociaux.

[12]  José Halloy,et al.  Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  T. Seeley.  The Wisdom of the Hive , 1995 .

[14]  M. Lindauer.  Communication Among Social Bees , 1961 .

[15]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Exploratory recruitment plasticity in a social spider (Anelosimus eximius). , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[17]  K. Weick.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. 2nd ed. , 1984 .

[18]  L. Conradt,et al.  Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized shortcuts in the Argentine ant , 1989, Naturwissenschaften.

[20]  T. Seeley,et al.  Quorum sensing during nest-site selection by honeybee swarms , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  John G. Robinson.  On the Move. How and Why Animals Travel in Groups , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Modulation of individual behavior and collective decision-making during aggregation site selection by the ant Messor barbarus , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  B. Roitberg,et al.  Joining and avoidance behavior in nonsocial insects. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[24]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Ants move to improve: colonies of Leptothorax albipennis emigrate whenever they find a superior nest site , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  T. Seeley,et al.  Group decision making in swarms of honey bees , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[26]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Dynamics of Aggregation and Emergence of Cooperation , 2002, The Biological Bulletin.

[27]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Collective patterns and decision-making , 1989 .

[28]  M. Dambach,et al.  Aggregation density and longevity correlate with humidity in first-instar nymphs of the cockroach (Blattella germanica L., Dictyoptera). , 1999, Journal of insect physiology.

[29]  Larissa Conradt,et al.  Conflicts of interest and the evolution of decision sharing , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  S. Milgram,et al.  Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size. , 1969 .

[32]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[33]  David J. T. Sumpter,et al.  Information transfer in moving animal groups , 2008, Theory in Biosciences.

[34]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Modulation of trail laying in the antLasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and its role in the collective selection of a food source , 1993, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[36]  Shevchenko Li,et al.  [The status of the stress-limiting and stress-realizing links in adaptation in newborn rabbits with experimental chronic fetal hypoxia]. , 1999 .

[37]  Guy Cowlishaw,et al.  When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making , 2007, Biology Letters.

[38]  James Surowiecki.  The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[39]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  David Austen-Smith,et al.  Information aggregation and communication in committees , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[41]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[42]  A. J. Batista-Leyva,et al.  Symmetry Breaking in Escaping Ants , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[43]  H. G. Wallraff.  Social interrelations involved in migratory orientation of birds: Possible contribution of field studies , 1978 .

[44]  S. Pratt,et al.  An agent-based model of collective nest choice by the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Individual discrimination capability and collective decision-making. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[46]  Andrew M Simons,et al.  Many wrongs: the advantage of group navigation. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[47]  Nancy G. Solomon,et al.  Current indirect fitness benefits associated with philopatry in juvenile prairie voles , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[48]  Thomas D. Seeley,et al.  When Is Self-Organization Used in Biological Systems? , 2002, The Biological Bulletin.

[49]  P. Visscher.  Group decision making in nest-site selection among social insects. , 2007, Annual review of entomology.

[50]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Discrete dragline attachment induces aggregation in spiderlings of a solitary species , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[52]  T. Seeley,et al.  Collective decision-making in honey bees: how colonies choose among nectar sources , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[53]  K. Laland,et al.  Social transmission of maladaptive information in the guppy , 1998 .

[54]  T. Seeley,et al.  Group decision making in nest-site selection by honey bees , 2004 .

[55]  A. J. Wood,et al.  Evolving the selfish herd: emergence of distinct aggregating strategies in an individual-based model , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  D. Sumpter,et al.  From nonlinearity to optimality: pheromone trail foraging by ants , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[57]  T. Seeley,et al.  Thorough warm-up before take-off in honey bee swarms , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[58]  D. Sumpter,et al.  From Compromise to Leadership in Pigeon Homing , 2006, Current Biology.

[59]  D. Sumpter.  The principles of collective animal behaviour , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Emerging patterns and food recruitment in ants: an analytical study , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[61]  T. Seeley,et al.  Group decision making in honey bee swarms , 2006 .

[62]  C. Rivault.  Spatial distribution of the cockroach, Blattella germanica, in a swimming‐bath facility , 1989 .

[63]  S. Ishii,et al.  Aggregation of german cockroach (Blattella germanica) nymphs , 2005, Experientia.

[64]  D J T Sumpter,et al.  The feeding dynamics of broiler chickens , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[65]  S. Pratt,et al.  The cavity-dwelling ant Leptothorax curvispinosus uses nest geometry to discriminate between potential homes , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[66]  Thomas D. Seeley,et al.  Consensus building during nest-site selection in honey bee swarms: the expiration of dissent , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[67]  K. Dahlberg.  ‘The Individual in the World - The World in the Individual’: Towards a Human Science Phenomenology that Includes the Social World , 2006 .

[68]  M. Lindauer.  Schwarmbienen auf Wohnungssuche , 1955, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[69]  Paul J. B. Hart,et al.  Quorum decision-making facilitates information transfer in fish shoals , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Self-organization in social insects. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[71]  Christian List,et al.  Democracy in animal groups: a political science perspective. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[72]  T. Seeley,et al.  Deciding on a new home: how do honeybees agree? , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.