Attributional life cycle assessment: is a land-use baseline necessary?

PurposeThis paper aims to clarify the application of a land-use baseline in attributional life cycle assessment (ALCA) for product systems involving land use, through consideration of the fundamental purpose of ALCA. Currently, there is no clear view in the literature whether a baseline should be used when accounting for environmentally relevant physical flows related to land use.MethodsAn extensive search of literature was carried out using the key terms ‘attributional life cycle assessment’ and ‘attributional LCA’ in the Google Scholar web search engine. Approximately 700 publications were reviewed and summarised according to their type and scope, relevance of land use, key statements and references given for ALCA, and arguments for and against using a baseline in ALCA. Based on the literature review and supplementary literature references, a critical discussion on the use of a baseline and determination of the most appropriate land-use baseline in ALCA is provided.Results and discussionA few studies clearly argued that only absolute (observable) flows without a baseline are to be inventoried in ALCA, while the majority of the studies did not make any clear statement for or against. On the other hand, a land-use baseline was explicitly applied or proposed in a minority of the studies only, despite the fact that we classified land use as highly relevant for the majority of the studies reviewed. Furthermore, the LCA guidelines reviewed give contradictory recommendations. The most cited studies for the definition of ALCA provide general rules for selecting processes based on observable flows but do not argue that observable flows necessarily describe the environmentally relevant physical flows.ConclusionsWe conclude that a baseline is required to separate the studied parts of the technosphere from natural processes and to describe the impact of land use on ecosystem quality, such as carbon sequestration and biodiversity. The most coherent baseline for human-induced land-use in ALCA is natural regeneration. As the natural-regeneration baseline has typically been excluded, may vary bio-geographically and temporally, and is subject to uncertainties, case studies applying it should be performed so that implications can be studied and evaluated. This is particularly important for agricultural and forestry systems, such as food, feed, fibre, timber and biofuels.

[1]  M. Huijbregts Uncertainty and variability in environmental life-cycle assessment , 2002 .

[2]  R. Clift,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy from waste via anaerobic digestion: a UK case study. , 2014, Waste management.

[3]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Waste-to-Materials: The Longterm Option , 2012 .

[4]  Eric Johnson Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2003 .

[5]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance , 2010 .

[6]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis , 2004 .

[7]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Bioenergy from forestry and changes in atmospheric CO2: reconciling single stand and landscape level approaches. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  M. T. Knudsen,et al.  Method for calculating carbon footprint of cattle feeds – including contribution from soil carbon changes and use of cattle manure , 2014 .

[9]  Jari Liski,et al.  Indirect carbon dioxide emissions from producing bioenergy from forest harvest residues , 2011 .

[10]  Biniam Samuel-Fitwi,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of raising rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in different production systems , 2013 .

[11]  T. Ekvall Cleaner production tools: LCA and beyond , 2002 .

[12]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Large‐scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral , 2012 .

[13]  David Zilberman,et al.  On market-mediated emissions and regulations on life cycle emissions , 2013 .

[14]  Llorenç Milà i Canals,et al.  Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of ‘fertile land’ in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) , 2007 .

[15]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[16]  Douglas J. Reinemann,et al.  Applying life-cycle assessment to low carbon fuel standards--How allocation choices influence carbon intensity for renewable transportation fuels , 2010 .

[17]  William R. Moomaw,et al.  Industrial Ecology and Global Change: Contents , 1994 .

[18]  R. Korhonen,et al.  Carbon balance and radiative forcing of Finnish peatlands 1900–2100 – the impact of forestry drainage , 2002 .

[19]  W. Kurz,et al.  Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change , 2008, Nature.

[20]  Gregg Marland,et al.  Forest/Biomass Based Mitigation Strategies: Does the Timing of Carbon Reductions Matter? , 1997, Economics of Carbon Sequestration in Forestry.

[21]  Bruno Notarnicola,et al.  Life Cycle Impact Assessment: a Case Study , 1998 .

[22]  H. Blonk,et al.  Methodology used in FeedPrint: a tool quantifying greenhouse gas emissions of feed production and utilization , 2013 .

[23]  S. Pfister,et al.  Assessing the Environmental Impact of Water Consumption by Energy Crops Grown in Spain , 2013 .

[24]  Llorenç Milà i Canals,et al.  Global characterisation factors to assess land use impacts on biotic production , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[25]  Moises Sudit,et al.  Impact Assessment , 2014, Cyber Defense and Situational Awareness.

[26]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production , 2008 .

[27]  Enrico Benetto,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of biogas production by monofermentation of energy crops and injection into the natural gas grid. , 2010 .

[28]  Bjart Holtsmark,et al.  The outcome is in the assumptions: analyzing the effects on atmospheric CO2 levels of increased use of bioenergy from forest biomass , 2013 .

[29]  G. Rebitzera,et al.  Life cycle assessment Part 1 : Framework , goal and scope definition , inventory analysis , and applications , 2004 .

[30]  T. Koellner,et al.  Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: a global approach , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[31]  Roland Clift,et al.  Distributed generation by energy from waste technology: A life cycle perspective , 2015 .

[32]  R. Antikainen,et al.  Land use in life cycle assessment , 2011 .

[33]  Other,et al.  Global guidance principles for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) databases: a basis for greener processes and products , 2011 .

[34]  Rabbe Thun,et al.  GHG emission performance of various liquid transportation biofuels in Finland in accordance with the EU sustainability criteria , 2013 .

[35]  Florian Schäfer,et al.  Farming and marketing system affects carbon and water footprint – a case study using Hokaido pumpkin , 2012 .

[36]  Roland Clift,et al.  Expert Workshop on Land Use Impacts in Life Cycle Assessment. 12–13 June 2006 Guildford, Surrey (UK) , 2006 .

[37]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  Life cycle performance assessment of small solar thermal cooling systems and conventional plants assisted with photovoltaics , 2014 .

[38]  H. Haberl Net land-atmosphere flows of biogenic carbon related to bioenergy: towards an understanding of systemic feedbacks , 2013, Global change biology. Bioenergy.

[39]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  The hitch hiker's guide to LCA : an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application , 2004 .

[40]  Anne-Marie Tillman,et al.  Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology , 2000 .

[41]  D. N. Bird,et al.  Greenhouse Gas ( GHG ) and energy analysis of a bioethanol oriented biorefinery based on wood , 2013 .

[42]  Miao Guo,et al.  Influence of agro-ecosystem modeling approach on the greenhouse gas profiles of wheat-derived biopolymer products. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[43]  R. Socolow Industrial Ecology and Global Change: Preface , 1994 .

[44]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories , 2005 .

[45]  O. Michelsen Eco-efficiency in extended supply chains – methodological development with regulatory and organizational implications , 2006 .

[46]  Bjart Holtsmark Material for : Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt , 2011 .

[47]  J. Sheehan Biofuels and the conundrum of sustainability. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[48]  Adrian Leip,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from the EU livestock sector: A life cycle assessment carried out with the CAPRI model , 2012 .

[49]  Bruce Vigon,et al.  Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases: development of training material and other implementation activities on the publication , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[50]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  Open-loop recycling: Criteria for allocation procedures , 1997 .

[51]  Fulvio Ardente,et al.  Rationales for and limitations of preferred solutions for multi-functionality problems in LCA: is increased consistency possible? , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[52]  Danièle Revel,et al.  Carbon sequestration: Managing forests in uncertain times , 2014 .

[53]  D W Pennington,et al.  Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications , 2004 .

[54]  T. Koellner,et al.  UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[55]  L. Heath,et al.  Greenhouse Gas and Carbon Profile of the U.S. Forest Products Industry Value Chain , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[56]  H. Haberl,et al.  Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Corinne Donahue Scown Life-Cycle Water Impacts of U.S. Transportation Fuels , 2010 .

[58]  Enrico Benetto,et al.  The use of temporal dynamics for the automatic calculation of land use impacts in LCA using R programming environment , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[59]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment , 1998 .

[60]  Maurizio Cellura,et al.  The Use of Genetic Algorithms to Solve the Allocation Problems in the Life Cycle Inventory , 2013 .

[61]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[62]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Life Cycle Impact Assessment , 2019, CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering.

[63]  B. Weidema Market information in life cycle assessment , 2003 .

[64]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Lights and shadows in consequential LCA , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[65]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of products : guide and backgrounds (Part 1) , 1992 .

[66]  Alissa Kendall,et al.  Time-adjusted global warming potentials for LCA and carbon footprints , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[67]  Eva-Lotta Lindholm,et al.  Energy Use and Environmental Impact of Roundwood and Forest Fuel Production in Sweden , 2010 .

[68]  Consequential and Attributional Approaches to LCA : a Guide to Policy Makers with Specific Reference to Greenhouse Gas LCA of Biofuels April 2008 , 2009 .

[69]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Greenhouse-gas payback times for crop-based biofuels , 2015 .

[70]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Konsekuenshiaru LCA no hikari to kage , 2014 .

[71]  Mark Goedkoop,et al.  Life-Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards Best Practice , 2002 .

[72]  L. Sokka,et al.  Approaches for inclusion of forest carbon cycle in life cycle assessment – a review , 2013 .

[73]  E. Hertwich,et al.  CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming , 2011 .

[74]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Life-cycle studies of biodiesel in Europe: A review addressing the variability of results and modeling issues , 2011 .

[75]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Avoiding Co‐Product Allocation in Life‐Cycle Assessment , 2000 .

[76]  M. Brander,et al.  The use of substitution in attributional life cycle assessment , 2011 .

[77]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Marginal production technologies for life cycle inventories , 1999 .

[78]  Anders S. G. Andrae,et al.  Attributional and Consequential Environmental Assessment of the Shift to Lead-Free Solders (10 pp) , 2006 .

[79]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental life cycle assessment of products , 1992 .

[80]  Sarah Sim,et al.  Land use impact assessment of margarine , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[81]  M. Araújo,et al.  The concept of potential natural vegetation: an epitaph? , 2010 .

[82]  Sampo Soimakallio,et al.  Global warming potentials of stemwood used for energy and materials in Southern Finland: differentiation of impacts based on type of harvest and product lifetime , 2016 .

[83]  C. Bauer,et al.  Key Elements in a Framework for Land Use Impact Assessment Within LCA (11 pp) , 2007 .

[84]  Mikael Lantz,et al.  Environmental performance of biogas produced from industrial residues including competition with animal feed – life-cycle calculations according to different methodologies and standards , 2013 .

[85]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[86]  Ola Wik,et al.  ENCORT-CDW : Evaluation of the European recovery target for construction and demolition waste , 2014 .

[87]  G. Sonnemann,et al.  The UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative , 2014 .

[88]  Ayodeji Oyewole Implementation of Land Use and Land Use Change and its Effects on Biodiversity in Life Cycle Assessment , 2010 .

[89]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands , 2002, Nature.