Centrality measures and the importance of generalist species in pollination networks

Studies of complex networks show that nodes with high centrality scores are important to network structure and stability. Following this rationale, centrality measures can be used to (i) identify keystone species in ecological networks, a major issue in community ecology, and (ii) differentiate the keystone species concept, e.g. species may play a key role in a network for different topological reasons. In 34 pollination communities we examine the relationship between the generalization level of species (ND) and two complementary centrality indices: closeness (CC) and betweenness centrality (BC). CC measures the proximity of a species to all other species in the community, while BC describes the importance of a species as a connector. Most networks had a linear ND–CC relationship with a minimum CC value of 0.41. Hence, species were close to each and will be likely to be rapidly affected by disturbances. Contrarily, in most networks, the ND–BC relationships were power-law distributed with exponents larger than one. Only 59% of the species were connectors (BC > 0). In particular, there was a connector threshold value of ND = 0.46. Species above this threshold represent � 40%, almost all of which were connectors. These results indicate that in pollination systems the most generalized species are usually network keystone species, playing at least two roles: (i) interact closely with most other species (high CC) and (ii) connect otherwise unconnected subnetworks (high BC). We discuss the implications of centrality measures to community-based conservation ecology.

[1]  J. Vandermeer.  Omnivory and the stability of food webs. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Tamiji Inoue,et al.  Insect-flower Relationship in the Campus of Kyoto University, Kyoto : An Overview of the Flowering Phenology and the Seasonal Pattern of Insect Visits , 1990 .

[3]  Richard B. Primack,et al.  Insect pollination in the New Zealand mountain flora , 1983 .

[4]  Mary Percival,et al.  Floral Ecology of Coastal Scrub in Southeast Jamaica , 1974 .

[5]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[6]  David W. Inouye,et al.  Pollination biology in the Snowy Mountains of Australia: Comparisons with montane Colorado, USA , 1988 .

[7]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Non-random coextinctions in phylogenetically structured mutualistic networks , 2007, Nature.

[8]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Size constraints and flower abundance determine the number of interactions in a plant /flower visitor web , 2006 .

[9]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Invariant properties in coevolutionary networks of plant-animal interactions , 2002 .

[10]  Makoto Kato,et al.  Flowering phenology and anthophilous insect community at a threatened natural lowland marsh at Nakaikemi in Tsuruga, Japan. , 1996 .

[11]  Lynn V. Dicks,et al.  Compartmentalization in plant–insect flower visitor webs , 2002 .

[12]  Jens M. Olesen,et al.  The Dense and Highly Connected World of Greenland's Plants and Their Pollinators , 2005 .

[13]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[14]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[15]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  J. Cane.  The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields , 1997 .

[17]  Makoto Kato.  Anthophilous insect community and plant-pollinator interactions on Amami Islands in the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan (Original paper) , 2000 .

[18]  Javier Herrera,et al.  Pollination relationships in southern Spanisch Mediterranean shrublands , 1988 .

[19]  Ferenc Jordán,et al.  Topological keystone species : measures of positional importance in food webs , 2006 .

[20]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek , 2005 .

[21]  R. Paine.  A Note on Trophic Complexity and Community Stability , 1969, The American Naturalist.

[22]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Temporal dynamics in a pollination network. , 2008, Ecology.

[23]  B. Hocking,et al.  Insect-flower associations in the high Arctic with special reference to nectar' , 1968 .

[24]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  ASYMMETRIC SPECIALIZATION: A PERVASIVE FEATURE OF PLANT-POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS , 2004 .

[25]  Jurek Kolasa,et al.  Complexity, system integration, and susceptibility to change: Biodiversity connection , 2005 .

[26]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Asymmetric Coevolutionary Networks Facilitate Biodiversity Maintenance , 2006, Science.

[27]  Makoto Kato,et al.  Insect-flower Relationship in the Temperate Deciduous Forest of Kibune, Kyoto : An Overview of the Flowering Phenology and the Seasonal Pattern of Insect Visits , 1990 .

[28]  J. Kolasa.  A community ecology perspective on variability in complex systems: The effects of hierarchy and integration , 2006 .

[29]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Modeling the world-wide airport network , 2004 .

[30]  P. Kevan.  Insect pollination of high Arctic flowers , 1972 .

[31]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance , 2002, Ecology Letters.

[32]  Mark Newman,et al.  Detecting community structure in networks , 2004 .

[33]  S. Strogatz.  Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[34]  Chang-Yong Lee.  Correlations among centrality measures in complex networks , 2006, physics/0605220.

[35]  Jane Memmott,et al.  Tolerance of pollination networks to species extinctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[36]  A. Timmermann,et al.  Pollination networks and functional specialization: a test using Lesser Antillean plant–hummingbird assemblages , 2008 .

[37]  Makoto Kato,et al.  Flowering Phenology and Anthophilous Insect Community in the Cool-Temperate Subalpine Forests and Meadows at Mt. Kushigata in the Central Part of Japan , 1993 .

[38]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[39]  Diego P. Vázquez,et al.  NULL MODEL ANALYSES OF SPECIALIZATION IN PLANT–POLLINATOR INTERACTIONS , 2003 .

[40]  Makoto Kato,et al.  Insect-flower Relationship in the Primary Beech Forest of Ashu, Kyoto : An Overview of the Flowering Phenology and the Seasonal Pattern of Insect Visits , 1990 .

[41]  L. Bersier,et al.  The signature of phylogenetic constraints on food-web structure , 2008 .

[42]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[43]  Juan J. Armesto,et al.  COMMUNITY STUDIES IN POLLINATION ECOLOGY IN THE HIGH TEMPERATE ANDES OF CENTRAL CHILE. I. POLLINATION MECHANISMS AND ALTITUDINAL VARIATION , 1982 .

[44]  J. Olesen,et al.  Invasion of pollination networks on oceanic islands: importance of invader complexes and endemic super generalists , 2002 .

[45]  Ernesto Estrada,et al.  Characterization of topological keystone species: Local, global and “meso-scale” centralities in food webs , 2007 .

[46]  Matthew W. Hahn,et al.  Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[47]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The smallest of all worlds: pollination networks. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[48]  N. Ramírez.  Biologia de polinizacion en una comunidad arbustiva tropical de la Alta Guayana Venezolana , 1989 .

[49]  Jens M. Olesen,et al.  The structure of a high latitude plant‐flower visitor system: the dominance of flies , 1999 .

[50]  David W. Inouye,et al.  ENDANGERED MUTUALISMS: The Conservation of Plant-Pollinator Interactions , 1998 .

[51]  Jens M. Olesen,et al.  Structure of a plant–flower‐visitor network in the high‐altitude sub‐alpine desert of Tenerife, Canary Islands , 2003 .

[52]  A. P. Schaffers,et al.  Parallel Declines in Pollinators and Insect-Pollinated Plants in Britain and the Netherlands , 2006, Science.

[53]  Hawoong Jeong,et al.  Classification of scale-free networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  Ernesto Estrada,et al.  Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.