Brownian motion or Lévy walk? Stepping towards an extended statistical mechanics for animal locomotion

Animals moving under the influence of spatio-temporal scaling and long-term memory generate a kind of space-use pattern that has proved difficult to model within a coherent theoretical framework. An extended kind of statistical mechanics is needed, accounting for both the effects of spatial memory and scale-free space use, and put into a context of ecological conditions. Simulations illustrating the distinction between scale-specific and scale-free locomotion are presented. The results show how observational scale (time lag between relocations of an individual) may critically influence the interpretation of the underlying process. In this respect, a novel protocol is proposed as a method to distinguish between some main movement classes. For example, the ‘power law in disguise’ paradox—from a composite Brownian motion consisting of a superposition of independent movement processes at different scales—may be resolved by shifting the focus from pattern analysis at one particular temporal resolution towards a more process-oriented approach involving several scales of observation. A more explicit consideration of system complexity within a statistical mechanical framework, supplementing the more traditional mechanistic modelling approach, is advocated.

[1]  Richard S. Ostfeld,et al.  Long-distance homing in meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus , 1996 .

[2]  T. D. Perera,et al.  Fish can encode order in their spatial map. , 2004 .

[3]  J. Fryxell,et al.  Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[4]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Overturning conclusions of Lévy flight movement patterns by fishing boats and foraging animals. , 2011, Ecology.

[5]  M. Plank,et al.  Optimal foraging: Lévy pattern or process? , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[6]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Environmental context explains Lévy and Brownian movement patterns of marine predators , 2010, Nature.

[7]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[8]  Arild O. Gautestad,et al.  The Dilution effect and the Space fill effect: Seeking to offset statistical artifacts when analyzing animal space use from telemetry fixes , 2012 .

[9]  Marie Auger-Méthé,et al.  Sampling rate and misidentification of Lévy and non-Lévy movement paths: comment. , 2011, Ecology.

[10]  D. Haydon,et al.  Multiple movement modes by large herbivores at multiple spatiotemporal scales , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  P. Garber,et al.  Role of spatial memory in primate foraging patterns: Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis , 1989, American journal of primatology.

[12]  Andy Reynolds,et al.  How many animals really do the Lévy walk? Comment. , 2008, Ecology.

[13]  E. Laca,et al.  Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns. , 1996 .

[14]  M. Mendl,et al.  Pigs in space: spatial memory and its susceptibility to interference , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  B. Hungate,et al.  15N enrichment as an integrator of the effects of C and N on microbial metabolism and ecosystem function. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[16]  Arild O. Gautestad,et al.  Spatial memory, habitat auto-facilitation and the emergence of fractal home range patterns , 2010 .

[17]  Derek W. Bailey,et al.  Large Herbivore Foraging and Ecological HierarchiesLandscape ecology can enhance traditional foraging theory , 1987 .

[18]  Steven F. Railsback,et al.  Individual-based modeling and ecology , 2005 .

[19]  Stephen P Ellner,et al.  Commentary on Holmes et al. (2007): resolving the debate on when extinction risk is predictable. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[20]  Arild O. Gautestad,et al.  Complex animal distribution and abundance from memory-dependent kinetics , 2006 .

[21]  S. Benhamou HOW MANY ANIMALS REALLY DO THE LÉVY WALK , 2007 .

[22]  Arild O. Gautestad,et al.  Intrinsic Scaling Complexity in Animal Dispersion and Abundance , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[23]  Arild O. Gautestad,et al.  The home range fractal: From random walk to memory-dependent space use , 2010 .

[24]  Jacqui Frair,et al.  The attraction of the known: the importance of spatial familiarity in habitat selection in wapiti Cervus elaphus , 2009 .

[25]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Lévy flight and Brownian search patterns of a free-ranging predator reflect different prey field characteristics. , 2012, The Journal of animal ecology.

[26]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Revisiting Lévy flight search patterns of wandering albatrosses, bumblebees and deer , 2007, Nature.

[27]  Nicolas E. Humphries,et al.  Scaling laws of marine predator search behaviour , 2008, Nature.

[28]  Darcy R. Visscher,et al.  Memory keeps you at home: a mechanistic model for home range emergence , 2009 .

[29]  H. Stanley,et al.  The Physics of Foraging: An Introduction to Random Searches and Biological Encounters , 2011 .

[30]  Michael J Plank,et al.  Sampling rate and misidentification of Lévy and non-Lévy movement paths. , 2009, Ecology.

[31]  Arild O. Gautestad Memory matters: influence from a cognitive map on animal space use. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  How many animals really do the Lévy walk? , 2008, Ecology.

[33]  E. Charnov Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[34]  A M Reynolds,et al.  The Lévy flight paradigm: random search patterns and mechanisms. , 2009, Ecology.

[35]  A. M. Edwards,et al.  Using likelihood to test for Lévy flight search patterns and for general power-law distributions in nature. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.

[36]  André M. de Roos,et al.  Demographic analysis of continuous-time life-history models. , 2007 .

[37]  Chris J. Johnson,et al.  Movement parameters of ungulates and scale‐specific responses to the environment , 2002 .