Study of the Effect of Temporal Sampling Frequency on DSCOVR Observations Using the GEOS-5 Nature Run Results (Part I): Earth's Radiation Budget

Satellites always sample the Earth-atmosphere system in a finite temporal resolution. This study investigates the effect of sampling frequency on the satellite-derived Earth radiation budget, with the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) as an example. The output from NASA’s Goddard Earth Observing System Version 5 (GEOS-5) Nature Run is used as the truth. The Nature Run is a high spatial and temporal resolution atmospheric simulation spanning a two-year period. The effect of temporal resolution on potential DSCOVR observations is assessed by sampling the full Nature Run data with 1-h to 24-h frequencies. The uncertainty associated with a given sampling frequency is measured by computing means over daily, monthly, seasonal and annual intervals and determining the spread across different possible starting points. The skill with which a particular sampling frequency captures the structure of the full time series is measured using correlations and normalized errors. Results show that higher sampling frequency gives more information and less uncertainty in the derived radiation budget. A sampling frequency coarser than every 4 h results in significant error. Correlations between true and sampled time series also decrease more rapidly for a sampling frequency less than 4 h.

[1]  Michael G. Bosilovich,et al.  Documentation and Validation of the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Data Assimilation System, Version 4 , 2005 .

[2]  Maximilian Reuter,et al.  A Method for Estimating the Sampling Error Applied to CM-SAF Monthly Mean Cloud Fractional Cover Data Retrieved From MSG SEVIRI , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Flying the TRMM Satellite in a general circulation model , 2002 .

[4]  M. Shupe,et al.  A transitioning Arctic surface energy budget: the impacts of solar zenith angle, surface albedo and cloud radiative forcing , 2011 .

[5]  Andrew K. Heidinger,et al.  PATMOS-x: Results from a Diurnally Corrected 30-yr Satellite Cloud Climatology , 2013 .

[6]  K. Moffett,et al.  Remote Sens , 2015 .

[7]  K. Trenberth,et al.  Earth's Global Energy Budget , 2009 .

[8]  David R. Doelling,et al.  Toward Optimal Closure of the Earth's Top-of-Atmosphere Radiation Budget , 2009 .

[9]  Andrea Molod,et al.  The GEOS-5 Atmospheric General Circulation Model: Mean Climate and Development from MERRA to Fortuna , 2012 .

[10]  Hsin-I Wu,et al.  A model comparison for daylength as a function of latitude and day of year , 1995 .

[11]  Patrick Minnis,et al.  Temporal Interpolation Methods for the Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Experiment , 1998 .

[12]  B. Metz The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2011 .

[13]  Gregory C. Reinsel,et al.  Effects of autocorrelation and temporal sampling schemes on estimates of trend and spatial correlation , 1990 .

[14]  Kevin E. Trenberth,et al.  Earth’s Energy Imbalance , 2014 .

[15]  Alexei Lyapustin,et al.  A method of retrieving cloud top height and cloud geometrical thickness with oxygen A and B bands for the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) mission: Radiative transfer simulations , 2013 .

[16]  Makiko Sato,et al.  Earth's energy imbalance and implications , 2011, 1105.1140.

[17]  Molly O. Baringer,et al.  State of the Climate in 2008 , 2009 .

[18]  Michael G. Bosilovich,et al.  Evaluation of the 7-km GEOS-5 Nature Run , 2015 .

[19]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Characterization of the temporal sampling error in space‐time‐averaged rainfall estimates from satellites , 2004 .