A person-artefact-task (PAT) model of flow antecedents in computer-mediated environments

Flow theory has been applied to computer-mediated environments to study positive user experiences such as increased exploratory behavior, communication, learning, positive affect, and computer use. However, a review of the existing flow studies in computer-mediated environments in Psychology, Consumer Behavior, Communications, Human-Computer Interaction, and Management Information Systems shows ambiguities in the conceptualization of flow constructs and inconsistency in the flow models. It thus raises the question of whether the direct adoption of traditional flow theory is appropriate without a careful reconceptualization to consider the uniqueness of the computer-mediated environments. This paper focuses on flow antecedents and identifies the importance of separating the task from the artefact within a computer-mediated environment. It proposes a component-based model that consists of person (P), artefact (A), and task (T), as well as the interactions of these components. The model, named the PAT model, is developed by understanding the original flow theory, reviewing existing empirical flow studies within computer-mediated environments, and analysing the characteristics of computer-mediated environments. A set of propositions is constructed to demonstrate the predictive power of the model.

[1]  P. NovakThomas,et al.  Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments , 2000 .

[2]  J. Webster,et al.  The Dimensionality and Correlates of Flow in Human-Computer Interactions. , 1993 .

[3]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  VenkateshViswanath Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use , 2000 .

[5]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[6]  D. Hoffman,et al.  The Influence of Goal-Directed and Experiential Activities on Online Flow Experiences , 2003 .

[7]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  Effect of hypertext and animation on learning , 2000, IRMA Conference.

[8]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[9]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[10]  J. Ghani Flow in human-computer interactions: test of a model , 1995 .

[11]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Technology, structure and workgroup effectiveness , 1984 .

[12]  J. Haworth,et al.  ‘Flow’ experience in the daily lives of sixth-form college students , 1994 .

[13]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[14]  Jawaid A. Ghani,et al.  The Experience Of Flow In Computer-Mediated And In Face-To-Face Groups , 1991, ICIS.

[15]  J. Haworth,et al.  Challenge, skill and positive subjective states in the! daily life of a sample of YTS students , 1995 .

[16]  Dale L. Goodhue,et al.  Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Inf , 1998 .

[17]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[18]  John W. Slocum,et al.  Technology, Structure, and Workgroup Effectiveness: A Test of a Contingency Model , 1984 .

[19]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Exploring the theoretical foundations of playfulness in computer interactions , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  Toward a Taxonomy of Human Performance. , 1975 .

[21]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[22]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[23]  Philip H. Mirvis Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1991 .

[24]  W PalmerJonathan,et al.  The Role of Interface in Electronic Commerce , 2001 .

[25]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments: Conceptual Foundations , 1996 .

[26]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  The Model Underlying the Measurement of the Impacts of the IIC on the End-Users , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[27]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[28]  G. Ellis,et al.  Measurement and Analysis Issues with Explanation of Variance in Daily Experience Using the Flow Model , 1994 .

[29]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[30]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Review: A Cognitive-Affective Model of Organizational Communication for Designing IT , 2001, MIS Q..

[31]  Dov Te 'eni : A COGNITIVE-AFFECTIVE MODEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL COMMUNICATION FOR DESIGNING IT , 2001 .

[32]  E. Webster,et al.  Playfulness and computers at work , 1989 .

[33]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[34]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[35]  Reed Larson,et al.  Optimal experience: Flow and writing , 1988 .

[36]  H. P. Sims,et al.  The Measurement of Job Characteristics , 1976 .

[37]  Rolf T. Wigand,et al.  Optimal experience of Web activities , 1999 .

[38]  J. Webster,et al.  Flow in Computer-Mediated Communication , 1992 .

[39]  Michael R. Simonson,et al.  Development of a Standardized Test of Computer Literacy and a Computer Anxiety Index , 1987 .

[40]  Christina M. Finneran,et al.  The Challenges of Studying Flow within a Computer-Mediated Environment , 2002 .

[41]  David A. Griffith,et al.  The Role of Interface in Electronic Commerce: Consumer Involvement with Print Versus On-Line Catalogs , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[42]  S. Deshpande,et al.  Task Characteristics and the Experience of Optimal Flow in Human—Computer Interaction , 1994 .

[43]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. , 1988 .

[44]  Tony Davies,et al.  Going with the flow: Web sites and customer involvement , 1999, Internet Res..

[45]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[46]  Jeff Mcquillan,et al.  THE CONDITIONS OF FLOW IN READING: TWO STUDIES OF OPTIMAL EXPERIENCE , 1996 .

[47]  Richard J. Haier,et al.  Intrinsic Enjoyment and Boredom Coping scales: Validation with personality, evoked potential and attention measures. , 1984 .

[48]  Hsiang Chen,et al.  Exploring Web users' on-line optimal flow experiences , 2000 .

[49]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Understanding user evaluations of information systems , 1995 .

[50]  Jane M. Carey,et al.  Human factors in information systems: emerging theoretical bases , 1995 .

[51]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach , 2000 .

[52]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  Venkateshviswanath,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000 .

[54]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow. The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York (HarperPerennial) 1990. , 1990 .