Elevated thymidine kinase 1 in serum following neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts poor outcome for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) commonly have an unfavorable prognosis. A molecular predictor for the identification of at-risk patients is urgently required. Thymidine kinase 1 in serum (S-TK1) is an enzyme involved in the synthesis of DNA precursors. In studies using immunohistochemistry, it was reported to be a more useful proliferation marker than Ki-67 in breast, lung and colorectal carcinoma. In the present study, we extended the research of prior breast carcinoma studies by postulating that in patients with LABC, overexpression of S-TK1 following neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts cancer outcome. An experimental design consisting of 48 patients with LABC was prospectively constructed and analyzed. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and definitive surgical therapy. Study homogeneity was maintained by standardized treatment, surveillance and compliance protocols. The S-TK1 concentration was detected using the anti-TK1 chicken IgY antibody, using a dot-blot immuno-assay. After a median follow-up of 30 months, the results indicated a statistically significant trend (unadjusted). Patients with high S-TK1 overexpression had a significantly higher incidence of recurrence (P=0.006) and cancer death (P= 0.0128) than those with low S-TK1 overexpression. A multivariate analysis provided identical results. The hazards ratio for developing recurrence in patients with higher S-TK1 expression was 6-7 times higher than the hazards ratio in patients with lower expression. In conclusion, our results indicate that a high S-TK1 concentration in sera from LABC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy is predictive of cancer outcome.

[1]  Q. Chu,et al.  Elevated levels of chemokine receptor CXCR4 in HER-2 negative breast cancer specimens predict recurrence. , 2007, The Journal of surgical research.

[2]  Z. Chang,et al.  Mitotic control of dTTP pool: a necessity or coincidence? , 2007, Journal of biomedical science.

[3]  D. Tiezzi,et al.  HER-2, p53, p21 and hormonal receptors proteins expression as predictive factors of response and prognosis in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant docetaxel plus epirubicin combination , 2007, BMC Cancer.

[4]  K. O’Neill,et al.  Thymidine kinase 1 – A prognostic and diagnostic indicator in ALL and AML patients , 2007, Leukemia.

[5]  K Fenwick,et al.  Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridisation of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  A. Nobel,et al.  Gene expression profiles do not consistently predict the clinical treatment response in locally advanced breast cancer , 2006, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[7]  J. Ross,et al.  Pharmacogenomic predictor of sensitivity to preoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel and fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  J. Byrd,et al.  Use of prognostic factors in risk stratification at diagnosis and time of treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia , 2006, Current opinion in hematology.

[9]  C. Laronga Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage III Breast Cancer , 2006 .

[10]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Thymidine kinase 1: a proliferation marker for determining prognosis and monitoring the surgical outcome of primary bladder carcinoma patients. , 2006, Oncology reports.

[11]  M. Cronin,et al.  A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  B. Madewell Serum thymidine kinase activity: an alternative to histologic markers of cellular proliferation in canine lymphoma. , 2004, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[13]  Roman Rouzier,et al.  Gene expression profiles in paraffin-embedded core biopsy tissue predict response to chemotherapy in women with locally advanced breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  S. Eriksson,et al.  The role of thymidine kinases in the activation of pyrimidine nucleoside analogues. , 2004, Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry.

[15]  S. Hilsenbeck,et al.  Gene expression profiling for the prediction of therapeutic response to docetaxel in patients with breast cancer , 2003, The Lancet.

[16]  H. Bear,et al.  Emerging role of taxanes in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: the potential and the questions. , 2003, The Surgical clinics of North America.

[17]  Qimin He,et al.  Production and characterisation of a novel chicken IgY antibody raised against C-terminal peptide from human thymidine kinase 1. , 2003, Journal of immunological methods.

[18]  C. V. D. van de Velde,et al.  Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  H. Katabuchi,et al.  Clinical Value of Thymidine Kinase in Patients with Cervical Carcinoma , 2001, Oncology.

[20]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Retrospective study of the prognostic role of serum thymidine kinase level in CLL patients with active disease treated with fludarabine. , 2001, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[21]  C. Isaacs,et al.  New prognostic factors for breast cancer recurrence. , 2001, Seminars in oncology.

[22]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Prognostic role of clinical, pathological and biological characteristics in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  T. Powles,et al.  Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemoendocrine therapy in primary breast carcinomas. , 1997, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[25]  B. Asselain,et al.  Breast tumour response to primary chemotherapy predicts local and distant control as well as survival. , 1995, European journal of cancer.

[26]  V. Semiglazov,et al.  Primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy and radiotherapy compared with primary radiotherapy alone in stage IIb-IIIa breast cancer. , 1994, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[27]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Feasibility of breast‐conservation surgery after induction chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma , 1992, Cancer.

[28]  Q. Han,et al.  [Management of stage III primary breast cancer. An analysis of 221 cases]. , 1992, Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chinese journal of surgery].

[29]  M. Schwartz Enzymes as prognostic markers and therapeutic indicators in patients with cancer. , 1992, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[30]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Comprehensive management of locally advanced breast cancer , 1990, Cancer.

[31]  N Gunduz,et al.  Influence of the interval between primary tumor removal and chemotherapy on kinetics and growth of metastases. , 1983, Cancer research.

[32]  G. MacGrogan,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm: a unicentre randomized trial with a 124-month median follow-up. Institut Bergonié Bordeaux Groupe Sein (IBBGS). , 1999, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[33]  B. Asselain,et al.  Prognostic factors in inflammatory breast cancer and therapeutic implications. , 1994, European journal of cancer.