The need for environmental horizon scanning.

Policymakers and practitioners in most fields, including conservation and the environment, often make decisions based on insufficient evidence. One reason for this is that issues appear unexpectedly, when with hindsight, many of them were foreseeable. A solution to the problem of being insufficiently prepared is routine horizon scanning, which we describe as the systematic search for potential threats and opportunities that are currently poorly recognized. Researchers can then decide which issues might be most worthwhile to study. Practitioners can also use horizon scanning to ensure timely policy development and research procurement. Here, we suggest that horizon scanning is an underused tool that should become a standard element of environmental and conservation practice. We make recommendations for its incorporation into research, policy and practice. We argue that, as an ecological and conservation community, we are failing to provide timely advice owing to a weakness in identifying forthcoming issues. We outline possible horizon-scanning methods, and also make recommendations as to how horizon scanning could have a more central role in environmental and conservation practice.

[1]  Richard D Handy,et al.  Toxicity of single walled carbon nanotubes to rainbow trout, (Oncorhynchus mykiss): respiratory toxicity, organ pathologies, and other physiological effects. , 2007, Aquatic toxicology.

[2]  L. P. Koh,et al.  Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity? , 2008 .

[3]  Alexandra C Morel,et al.  How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  D. King,et al.  Taking Science Out of the Box--Foresight Recast , 2007, Science.

[5]  Lang Tran,et al.  Safe handling of nanotechnology , 2006, Nature.

[6]  Michael Depledge,et al.  Nanotechnology and the environment: risks and rewards. , 2005, Marine pollution bulletin.

[7]  J. Raakjær,et al.  Making Fisheries Mangement Work: implementation of Policies for Sustainable Fishing , 2008 .

[8]  Des B. A. Thompson,et al.  Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified by horizon scanning , 2007 .

[9]  G. Singleton,et al.  Cross-strain protection reduces effectiveness of virally vectored fertility control : results from individual-based multistrain models , 2007 .

[10]  J. Holmes,et al.  Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy-making and regulation , 2008 .

[11]  David W. Macdonald,et al.  The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK , 2006 .

[12]  John H. Lawton,et al.  Ecology, politics and policy , 2007 .

[13]  Paul Saffo Six rules for accurate effective forecasting. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[14]  Ralph J. Cicerone Geoengineering: Encouraging Research and Overseeing Implementation , 2006 .

[15]  Paul Saffo Six rules for effective forecasting , 2007 .

[16]  Jean-Arcady Meyer,et al.  The Psikharpax project: towards building an artificial rat , 2005, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[17]  Craig A. Poland,et al.  Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[18]  Charles Francis,et al.  The State of the Nation's Ecosystems. , 2003 .

[19]  K. Dreher,et al.  Health and environmental impact of nanotechnology: toxicological assessment of manufactured nanoparticles. , 2003, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.