Measuring consumers' willingness to pay with utility-based recommendation systems

Our paper addresses two gaps in research on recommendation systems: first, leveraging them to predict consumers' willingness to pay; second, estimating non-linear utility functions - which are generally held to provide better approximations of consumers' preference structures than linear functions - at a reasonable level of cognitive consumer effort. We develop an approach to simultaneously estimate exponential utility functions and willingness to pay at a low level of cognitive consumer effort. The empirical evaluation of our new recommendation system's utility and willingness to pay estimates with the estimates of a system based on linear utility functions indicates that exponential utility functions are better suited for predicting optimal recommendation ranks for products. Linear utility functions perform better in estimating consumers' willingness to pay. Based on our experimental data set, we show how retailers can use these willingness to pay estimates for profit-maximizing pricing decisions. We measure consumers' willingness to pay with a low-effort recommendation system.It provides companies with low-cost input for many business decision models.We compare linear and exponential utility functions in terms of prediction accuracy.Exponential utility functions are better suited for predicting recommendation ranks.Linear utility functions perform better in estimating consumers' willingness to pay.

[1]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Smart-Swaps - A decision support system for multicriteria decision analysis with the even swaps method , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  William L. Moore,et al.  A cross-validity comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models , 2004 .

[3]  John C. Butler,et al.  Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models , 1997 .

[4]  Gary J. Russell,et al.  Measuring Brand Value with Scanner Data , 1993 .

[5]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Testing the Reliability of Weight Elicitation Methods: Direct Rating versus Point Allocation , 2000 .

[6]  Min Ding,et al.  Eliciting Preference for Complex Products: A Web-Based Upgrading Method , 2008 .

[7]  Peter M. Senge,et al.  Overcoming limits to learning in computer-based learning environments , 1992 .

[8]  Gilvan C. Souza,et al.  The optimal pace of product updates , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  J. Louviere,et al.  A comparison of importance weights and willingness-to-pay measures derived from choice-based conjoint, constant sum scales and best-worst scaling , 2008 .

[10]  Rajeev Kohli,et al.  Consideration Sets in Conjoint Analysis , 1996 .

[11]  Klaus Miller,et al.  How Should Consumers’ Willingness to Pay be Measured? An Empirical Comparison of State-of-the-Art Approaches , 2011 .

[12]  John C. Butler,et al.  Enabling e-transactions with multi-attribute preference models , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Recommendation Agents for Electronic Commerce: Effects of Explanation Facilities on Trusting Beliefs , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Ali E. Abbas,et al.  One-Switch Independence for Multiattribute Utility Functions , 2011, Oper. Res..

[15]  P. Nelson Information and Consumer Behavior , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  J. March Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice , 1978 .

[17]  Charles M. Harvey,et al.  Conditions on Risk Attitude for a Single Attribute , 1981 .

[18]  A. Denis Rationality , 2012, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[19]  Victor B. Kreng,et al.  Evaluation of knowledge portal development tools using a fuzzy AHP approach: The case of Taiwanese stone industry , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  R. Dawes Judgment under uncertainty: The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making , 1979 .

[21]  Ehsan S. Soofi,et al.  A Minimum Discrimination Information Estimation of Multiattribute Market Share Models , 1992 .

[22]  Reinhold Decker,et al.  Measuring Consumer Preferences for Complex Products: A Compositional Approach BasedonPaired Comparisons , 2010 .

[23]  Manoj K. Agarwal,et al.  A cross validation test of four models for quantifying multiattribute preferences , 1993 .

[24]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[25]  Sönke Albers,et al.  Vickrey vs. eBay: Why Second-Price Sealed-Bid Auctions Lead to More Realistic Price-Demand Functions , 2010, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[26]  Jonathan L. Herlocker,et al.  Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems , 2004, TOIS.

[27]  B. Ratchford,et al.  Consumer information search revisited: Theory and empirical analysis , 1997 .

[28]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A Cross-Validity Comparison of Conjoint Analysis and Choice Models at Different Levels of Aggregation , 1998 .

[29]  Matthew T. Jones Bidding fever in eBay auctions of Amazon.com gift certificates , 2011 .

[30]  Sven Theysohn,et al.  Willingness-to-pay estimation with choice-based conjoint analysis: Addressing extreme response behavior with individually adapted designs , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  John Buchanan,et al.  Capturing decision maker preference: Experimental comparison of decision analysis and MCDM techniques , 1997 .

[32]  Douglas J. Morrice,et al.  A Multiple Attribute Utility Theory Approach to Ranking and Selection , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[33]  D. Wittink,et al.  Diagnosing competitive reactions using (aggregated) scanner data , 1992 .

[34]  Rohit Verma,et al.  Issues in the use of ratings-based versus choice-based conjoint analysis in operations management research , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  Ali E. Abbas,et al.  One-Switch Conditions for Multiattribute Utility Functions , 2012, Oper. Res..

[36]  J S Hammond,et al.  Even swaps: a rational method for making trade-offs. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[37]  Tim Coltman,et al.  Realigning Service Operations Strategy at DHL Express , 2010, Interfaces.

[38]  Robert Meeds,et al.  Cognitive and attitudinal effects of technical advertising copy: the roles of gender, self-assessed and objective consumer knowledge , 2004 .

[39]  M. Dewally,et al.  Reputation, Certification, Warranties, and Information as Remedies for Seller-Buyer Information Asymmetries: Lessons from the On-Line Comic Book Market , 2006 .

[40]  Christian Schlereth,et al.  Using discrete choice experiments to estimate willingness-to-pay intervals , 2012 .

[41]  Oded Netzer,et al.  Adaptive Self-Explication of Multiattribute Preferences , 2011 .

[42]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  The Adaptive Web, Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization , 2007, The Adaptive Web.

[43]  Michael Scholz,et al.  Estimating Optimal Recommendation Set Sizes for Individual Consumers , 2012, ICIS.

[44]  Shawn P. Curley,et al.  Do Recommender Systems Manipulate Consumer Preferences? A Study of Anchoring Effects , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  J. Lindén,et al.  Eliciting Reservation Prices: Becker–Degroot–Marschak Mechanisms vs. Markets , 1997 .

[46]  Christina Sichtmann,et al.  An empirical comparison of methods to measure willingness to pay by examining the hypothetical bias , 2005 .

[47]  Koert van Ittersum,et al.  Attribute-value functions as global interpretations of attribute importance , 2012 .

[48]  MARY A. SMITH,et al.  REPUTATION , 1913, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[49]  Shiu-li Huang,et al.  Designing utility-based recommender systems for e-commerce: Evaluation of preference-elicitation methods , 2011, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[50]  Jacky Montmain,et al.  A possibilistic-valued multi-criteria decision-making support for marketing activities in e-commerce: Feedback Based Diagnosis System , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  Yukun Cao,et al.  An intelligent fuzzy-based recommendation system for consumer electronic products , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[52]  Valerie J. Trifts,et al.  Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids , 2000 .

[53]  B. Skiera,et al.  Measuring Consumers' Willingness to Pay at the Point of Purchase , 2002 .

[54]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  An Evaluation Cost Model of Consideration Sets , 1990 .

[55]  Young-Hoon Park,et al.  Willingness to Pay and Competition in Online Auctions , 2007 .

[56]  Franziska Voelckner,et al.  An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers’ willingness to pay , 2006 .

[57]  Peter Haddawy,et al.  Integrating Visualization and Multi-Attribute Utility Theory for Online Product Selection , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[58]  Florian Dost,et al.  Measuring willingness to pay as a range, revisited: When should we care? , 2012 .

[59]  Mark Goh,et al.  Fuzzy multi-objective vendor selection under lean procurement , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[60]  Arnaud De Bruyn,et al.  Offering Online Recommendations with Minimum Customer Input Through Conjoint-Based Decision Aids , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[61]  Z. John Zhang,et al.  Augmenting Conjoint Analysis to Estimate Consumer Reservation Price , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[62]  Abdulmotaleb El-Saddik,et al.  Collaborative error-reflected models for cold-start recommender systems , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[63]  David B. Shmoys,et al.  Dynamic Assortment Optimization with a Multinomial Logit Choice Model and Capacity Constraint , 2010, Oper. Res..

[64]  Steven H. Cohen,et al.  Market segmentation with choice-based conjoint analysis , 1995 .

[65]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  E-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact , 2007, MIS Q..

[66]  Hui Xiong,et al.  Cost-Aware Collaborative Filtering for Travel Tour Recommendations , 2014, TOIS.

[67]  Ling Li,et al.  A randomized pricing decision support system in electronic commerce , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[68]  P. Green,et al.  Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects , 2001 .

[69]  R. Kohli,et al.  Internet Recommendation Systems , 2000 .

[70]  B. Skiera,et al.  Measurement of Consumer Preferences for Bucket Pricing Plans with Different Service Attributes , 2011 .

[71]  Michael Scholz,et al.  A Low-Effort Recommendation System with High Accuracy , 2013, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[72]  Rabikar Chatterjee,et al.  Reservation Price as a Range: An Incentive-Compatible Measurement Approach , 2007 .

[73]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[74]  David Schuff,et al.  What Makes a Helpful Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com , 2010 .