On the relationship between hydrodynamic characteristics and the kinetics of column flotation. Part I: Modeling the gas dispersion

Abstract Modeling of flotation has been the subject of many investigations aiming at better understanding the process behavior per se, and as well for process design, control and optimization purposes. With this regard, the importance of hydrodynamic characteristics, either as manipulated or measured variables, are paramount. The interfacial area of bubbles ( I b ) is introduced in Part 1 of this paper as a hydrodynamic variable providing more information about the size distribution than the commonly used bubble surface area flux ( S b ). Experimental evidence shows that the bubble size distribution can exhibit normal, lognormal, and even multi-modal shape. Unlike the Sauter mean diameter ( d 32 ) and S b , the interfacial area of bubbles is derived from the complete bubble size distribution, and takes into account these specific characteristics. Fundamental expressions are proposed to allow characterising I b using the population mean and standard deviation. Experimental results indicate that for lognormal bubble size distributions, I b correlates well with the gas hold-up and d 32 . Part 2 of the paper analyzes the correlation of gas dispersion characteristics with flotation rate constant.

[1]  Kari Heiskanen,et al.  Visual technique for measuring bubble size in flotation machines , 2002 .

[2]  Jocelyn Bouchard,et al.  Parameterization of Bubble Size Distribution in Flotation Columns , 2013 .

[3]  Cyril T. O'Connor,et al.  Measurement of the effects of physical and chemical variables on bubble size , 1990 .

[4]  Juan Yianatos,et al.  Gas dispersion pattern in mechanical flotation cells , 2012 .

[5]  M. Maldonado,et al.  An update on the estimation of the froth depth using conductivity measurements , 2008 .

[6]  James A. Finch,et al.  Gas dispersion properties: bubble surface area flux and gas holdup , 2000 .

[7]  Weihua Gui,et al.  Probability density function of bubble size based reagent dosage predictive control for copper roughing flotation , 2014 .

[8]  J. Franzidis,et al.  Simultaneous determination of collection zone rate constant and froth zone recovery in a mechanical flotation environment , 1999 .

[9]  Sergio Bordel,et al.  Modeling of the evolution with length of bubble size distributions in bubble columns , 2006 .

[10]  J. Finch,et al.  Some gas dispersion characteristics of mechanical flotation machines , 2006 .

[11]  Weihua Gui,et al.  Flotation process fault detection using output PDF of bubble size distribution , 2012 .

[12]  Porntip Wongsuchoto,et al.  Bubble size distribution and gas–liquid mass transfer in airlift contactors , 2003 .

[13]  Juan Yianatos,et al.  Industrial evaluation of a new flotation mechanism for large flotation cells , 2012 .

[14]  Juan Yianatos,et al.  Hydrodynamic and metallurgical characterization of industrial flotation banks for control purposes , 2001 .

[15]  Ana Casali,et al.  Rate constant modelling for batch flotation, as a function of gas dispersion properties , 2005 .

[16]  James A. Finch,et al.  On the origin of bi-modal bubble size distributions in the absence of frother , 2012 .

[17]  James A. Finch,et al.  A comparison between capillary and imaging techniques for sizing bubbles in flotation systems , 2004 .

[18]  T. Napier-Munn,et al.  Studies on impeller type, impeller speed and air flow rate in an industrial scale flotation cell. Part 5: Validation of k-Sb relationship and effect of froth depth , 1998 .

[19]  Emmanuel Manlapig,et al.  The empirical prediction of bubble surface area flux in mechanical flotation cells from cell design and operating data , 1999 .

[20]  Kari Heiskanen,et al.  Bubble size distribution in laboratory scale flotation cells , 2005 .

[21]  Measurement of local specific interfacial area in bubble columns via a non-isokinetic withdrawal method coupled to electro-optical detector , 2008 .

[22]  S. Grano,et al.  Hydrodynamics and scale up in Rushton turbine flotation cells: Part 2. Flotation scale-up for laboratory and pilot cells , 2006 .

[23]  D. Gómez‐Díaz,et al.  Interfacial area evaluation in a bubble column in the presence of a surface-active substance: Comparison of methods , 2008 .

[24]  Seng How Kuan.  The Effect of Solids on Gas Holdup, Bubble Size and Water Overflow Rate in Flotation , 2009 .

[25]  J. Franzidis,et al.  Studies on impeller type, impeller speed and air flow rate in an industrial scale flotation cell. Part 4: Effect of bubble surface area flux on flotation performance☆ , 1997 .

[26]  D. A. Deglon,et al.  An evaluation of a direct method of bubble size distribution measurement in a laboratory batch flotation cell , 1994 .

[27]  Estrella Alvarez,et al.  Experimental interfacial area measurements in a bubble column , 2010 .

[28]  Kari Heiskanen,et al.  On the relationship between flotation rate and bubble surface area flux , 2000 .

[29]  Weihua Gui,et al.  Recognition of the operational statuses of reagent addition using dynamic bubble size distribution in copper flotation process , 2013 .

[30]  John C Little,et al.  Predicting diffused-bubble oxygen transfer rate using the discrete-bubble model. , 2002, Water research.