Evaluation of OraQuick® HIV-1/2 as Oral Rapid Test.

As Cameroon scales up its national HIV/AIDS control program, evaluating the performance of commercially available tests for accurate and cost effective diagnostics becomes essential. A cross-sectional study assessed the performance of an HIV oral rapid test. A total of 1520 participants consented to participate in the study. After counselling, they were tested for HIV using the national algorithm followed by OraQuick. Results of the national algorithm were compared to those of OraQuick, for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values. 62% of participants were male, and 1% was reported HIV-positive following the national algorithm. The OraQuick test had 93% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 99.93% NPV and 90% PPV (95% CI, Kappa 0.965). Though more expensive (2-6x) compared to the national algorithm tests, oral mucosal transudate-based test demonstrated good performance. Therefore, it could be implemented in resource-constrained settings if subsidized and could increase participation since less invasive with no blood accident exposure.

[1]  N. Constantine,et al.  HIV testing technologies after two decades of evolution. , 2005, The Indian journal of medical research.

[2]  P. Ndumbe,et al.  Field Evaluation of Calypte’s AWARE™ Blood Serum Plasma (BSP) and Oral Mucosal Transudate (OMT) Rapid Tests for Detecting Antibodies to HIV-1 and 2 in Plasma and Oral Fluid , 2009, The open AIDS journal.

[3]  Robert J. O'Connell,et al.  Performance of the OraQuick Rapid Antibody Test for Diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection in Patients with Various Levels of Exposure to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[4]  S. Gregson,et al.  Methods to Reduce Social Desirability Bias in Sex Surveys in Low-Development Settings: Experience in Zimbabwe , 2002, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[5]  M. Symonds,et al.  An evaluation of the performance of OraQuick® ADVANCE Rapid HIV-1/2 Test in a high-risk population attending genitourinary medicine clinics in East London, UK , 2008, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[6]  R. Brookmeyer,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of rapid HIV testing of pregnant women in India. , 2003, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[7]  M. Peeters,et al.  Inaccurate Diagnosis of HIV-1 Group M and O Is a Key Challenge for Ongoing Universal Access to Antiretroviral Treatment and HIV Prevention in Cameroon , 2009, PloS one.

[8]  James Mudzori,et al.  Field evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of an oral fluid rapid test for HIV, tested at point-of-service sites in rural Zimbabwe. , 2009, AIDS patient care and STDs.

[9]  G. Vercauteren,et al.  Guidelines for using HIV testing technologies in surveillance : selection, evaluation and implementation , 2001 .

[10]  B. Branson,et al.  Rapid HIV testing , 2005, Postgraduate medicine.