Technology transformation and purposed play: model development and implications for high tech product development

High technology companies increasingly meet the demand for rapid innovation by building on the work done by other firms. Many high technology firms use technology transformation, adding their own Intellectual Property (IP) to others' platform technologies to create their own breakthrough innovations or new technologies. Transformation examples can be found in many industries (automobile, consumer electronics, biomedical, etc.) adapting semiconductor chip technologies into their own innovations. Technology transformation could lead to new sources of high technology revenues and speed overall innovation. Current work suggests that purposed play (directed experimentation) is important in the transformation process. Initial surveys among high technology companies have indicated extensions of previously studied diffusion models could explain the growth of technology transformation. We review the old paradigms of organisational technology adoption and innovation processes; then we propose a new paradigm that incorporates the role of transformation. An organisation-level technology transformation model (TTM) has been suggested by preliminary surveys within various high technology industry sectors. The salient features of the TTM are outlined here. This model would have strong implications for both the marketing of technologies as products and the ongoing development of technologies and high technology products.

[1]  H. G. Jones,et al.  The New Realities , 1990 .

[2]  P. Drucker Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[3]  Ronald Siu Man Lau,et al.  Strategic Flexibility: A New Reality for World-Class Manufacturing , 1996 .

[4]  Rajdeep Grewal,et al.  Building Organizational Capabilities for Managing Economic Crisis: The Role of Market Orientation and Strategic Flexibility , 2001 .

[5]  R. Verganti Planned Flexibility: Linking Anticipation and Reaction in Product Development Projects , 1999 .

[6]  S. Harris,et al.  Creating Readiness for Organizational Change , 1993 .

[7]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations, Fourth Edition , 1982 .

[8]  Uwe Jasnoch,et al.  Towards a Virtual Prototyping Environment , 1995 .

[9]  J. Sample,et al.  Attitude and Prediction of Behavior , 1973 .

[10]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[11]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of Innovations; A Cross-Cultural Approach. , 1974 .

[12]  D. Garvin Building a learning organization. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[13]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. , 1984 .

[14]  Stephen Swailes,et al.  Organizational Change , 1997 .

[15]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[16]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[17]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .

[18]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Wellsprings of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation , 1995 .

[19]  J. March Footnotes To Organizational Change , 1980 .

[20]  Jonathan P. Allen Information systems use in continuously innovative organizations , 1998 .

[21]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Toward a Unifying Framework for Exploring Fit and Flexibility in Strategic Human Resource Management , 1998 .

[22]  C. K. Chua,et al.  Rapid prototyping versus virtual prototyping in product design and manufacturing , 1999 .

[23]  Paul Shrivastava,et al.  The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st-Century Capitalism , 1994 .

[24]  Nelson R. Kellogg,et al.  The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for 21st-Century Capitalism by Robert B. Reich (review) , 1993, Technology and Culture.

[25]  T. J. Larsen,et al.  Technology diffusion and organizational transformation : An integrative framework , 1998 .

[26]  Adrian Demaid,et al.  Trans-organizational innovation: a framework for research , 1997 .

[27]  R. Chandy,et al.  The Incumbent's Curse? Incumbency, Size, and Radical Product Innovation , 2000 .

[28]  B. Wildemuth An empirically grounded model of the adoption of intellectual technologies , 1992 .

[29]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[30]  John W. Murphy,et al.  Managing Technological Innovation , 1987 .

[31]  Barbara W. Keats,et al.  Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century , 1998 .

[32]  Gustavo Stubrich The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization , 1993 .

[33]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[34]  E. Rogers,et al.  Communication of innovations: A cross-cultural approach, 2nd ed. , 1971 .

[35]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Innovations and organizations , 2020, Organizational Innovation.

[36]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[37]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[38]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[39]  G. Barczak,et al.  Managing large-scale organizational change , 1987 .

[40]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Usability - Turning Technologies into Tools , 1992 .

[41]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Preparing for an Uncertain Future: Managing Organizations for Strategic Flexibility , 1997 .

[42]  W. Starbuck Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[43]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[44]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..