FMEA of MR-Only Treatment Planning in the Pelvis

Purpose To evaluate the implementation of a magnetic resonance (MR)-only workflow (ie, implementing MR simulation as the primary planning modality) using failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) in comparison with a conventional multimodality (MR simulation in conjunction with computed tomography simulation) workflow for pelvis external beam planning. Methods and Materials To perform the FMEA, a multidisciplinary 9-member team was assembled and developed process maps, identified potential failure modes (FMs), and assigned numerical values to the severity (S), frequency of occurrence (O), and detectability (D) of those FMs. Risk priority numbers (RPNs) were calculated via the product of S, O, and D as a metric for evaluating relative patient risk. An alternative 3-digit composite number (SOD) was computed to emphasize high-severity FMs. Fault tree analysis identified the causality chain leading to the highest-severity FM. Results Seven processes were identified, 3 of which were shared between workflows. Image fusion and target delineation subprocesses using the conventional workflow added 9 and 10 FMs, respectively, with 6 RPNs >100. By contrast, synthetic computed tomography generation introduced 3 major subprocesses and propagated 46 unique FMs, 15 with RPNs >100. For the conventional workflow, the largest RPN scores were introduced by image fusion (RPN range, 120-192). For the MR-only workflow, the highest RPN scores were from inaccuracies in target delineation resulting from misinterpretation of MR images (RPN = 240) and insufficient management of patient- and system-level distortions (RPN = 210 and 168, respectively). Underestimation (RPN = 140) or overestimation (RPN = 192) of bone volume produced higher RPN scores. The highest SODs for both workflows were related to changes in target location because of internal anatomy changes (conventional = 961, MR-only = 822). Conclusions FMEA identified areas for mitigating risk in MR-only pelvis RTP, and SODs identified high-severity process modes. Efforts to develop a quality management program to mitigate high FMs are underway.

[1]  P. Kindl,et al.  Hounsfield units variations , 2013, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[2]  Donald D. Tippett,et al.  Project Risk Management Using the Project Risk FMEA , 2004 .

[3]  Tufve Nyholm,et al.  Systematisation of spatial uncertainties for comparison between a MR and a CT-based radiotherapy workflow for prostate treatments , 2009, Radiation oncology.

[4]  Fredrik Nordström,et al.  Technical Note: MRI only prostate radiotherapy planning using the statistical decomposition algorithm. , 2015, Medical physics.

[5]  Carri Glide-Hurst,et al.  Image Guided Radiation Therapy Using Synthetic Computed Tomography Images in Brain Cancer. , 2016, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: Application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management. , 2016, Medical physics.

[7]  Joshua Kim,et al.  Technical Note: Characterization and correction of gradient nonlinearity induced distortion on a 1.0 T open bore MR-SIM. , 2015, Medical physics.

[8]  Jonathan B Kruskal,et al.  Application of failure mode and effect analysis in a radiology department. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  Sheng‐Hsien Teng,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis: An integrated approach for product design and process control , 1996 .

[10]  Julian R Perks,et al.  Failure mode and effect analysis for delivery of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Ersin Bayram,et al.  Optimization of a novel large field of view distortion phantom for MR‐only treatment planning , 2017, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[12]  M. Moerland,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging acquisition techniques for radiotherapy planning. , 2014, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[13]  E Bellon,et al.  The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the three-dimensional treatment planning of localized prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Carri Glide-Hurst,et al.  Implementation of a novel algorithm for generating synthetic CT images from magnetic resonance imaging data sets for prostate cancer radiation therapy. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  J. Prisciandaro,et al.  Failure mode and effects analysis in a dual-product microsphere brachytherapy environment. , 2016, Practical radiation oncology.

[16]  Olivier Salvado,et al.  An atlas-based electron density mapping method for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-alone treatment planning and adaptive MRI-based prostate radiation therapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  P. Albers,et al.  MR-sequences for prostate cancer diagnostics: validation based on the PI-RADS scoring system and targeted MR-guided in-bore biopsy , 2014, European Radiology.

[18]  Indrin J Chetty,et al.  Magnetic Resonance-Based Automatic Air Segmentation for Generation of Synthetic Computed Tomography Scans in the Head Region. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Eric C Ford,et al.  Evaluation of safety in a radiation oncology setting using failure mode and effects analysis. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Margie Hunt,et al.  Dosimetric and workflow evaluation of first commercial synthetic CT software for clinical use in pelvis , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Adam Johansson,et al.  CT substitute derived from MRI sequences with ultrashort echo time. , 2011, Medical physics.

[22]  Keith Case,et al.  FAILURE MODES AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS THROUGH KNOWLEDGE MODELLING , 2004 .

[23]  W S Bice,et al.  CT and MRI derived source localization error in a custom prostate phantom using automated image coregistration. , 2001, Medical physics.

[24]  D A Jaffray,et al.  Characterization of tissue magnetic susceptibility-induced distortions for MRIgRT. , 2012, Medical physics.

[25]  Mary Feng,et al.  Investigation of a method for generating synthetic CT models from MRI scans of the head and neck for radiation therapy , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.