New opportunities for fracture healing detection: Impedance spectroscopy measurements correlate to tissue composition in fractures

Accurate evaluation of fracture healing is important for clinical decisions on when to begin weight‐bearing and when early intervention is necessary in cases of fracture nonunion. While the stages of healing involving hematoma, cartilage, trabecular bone, and cortical bone have been well characterized histologically, physicians typically track fracture healing by using subjective physical examinations and radiographic techniques that are only able to detect mineralized stages of bone healing. This exposes the need for a quantitative, reliable technique to monitor fracture healing, and particularly to track healing progression during the early stages of repair. The goal of this study was to validate the use of impedance spectroscopy to monitor fracture healing and perform comprehensive evaluation comparing measurements with histological evidence. Here, we show that impedance spectroscopy not only can distinguish between cadaver tissues involved throughout fracture repair, but also correlates to fracture callus composition over the middle stages of healing in wild‐type C57BL/6 mice. Specifically, impedance magnitude has a positive relationship with % trabecular bone and a negative relationship with % cartilage, and the opposite relationships are found when comparing phase angle to these same volume fractions of tissues. With this information, we can quantitatively evaluate how far a fracture has progressed through the healing stages. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of impedance spectroscopy for detection of fracture callus composition and reveals its potential as a method for early detection of bone healing and fracture nonunion. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2620–2629, 2017.

[1]  K. Foster,et al.  Dielectric properties of mammalian tissues from 0.1 to 100 MHz: a summary of recent data. , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Xiaolu Hou,et al.  Electrical impedance spectroscopy - a potential method for the study and monitoring of a bone critical-size defect healing process treated with bone tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches. , 2016, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[3]  Ioana Ciuchi,et al.  Impedance Spectroscopy characterization of bone tissues , 2010 .

[4]  K. Javed,et al.  Evaluation of bone fracture in animal model using bio-electrical impedance analysis , 2016 .

[5]  J. O'Connor,et al.  Characterization of a Closed Femur Fracture Model in Mice , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[6]  Georg Bergmann,et al.  Implantable Sensor Technology: From Research to Clinical Practice , 2012, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[7]  K. Gupta,et al.  Changes in electrical properties of bones as a diagnostic tool for measurement of fracture healing , 2013 .

[8]  M. S. Sørensen,et al.  Histomorphometric Estimation of Air Cell Development in Experimental Otitis Media , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[9]  Thomas A Einhorn,et al.  The biology of fracture healing. , 2011, Injury.

[10]  T. Kubo,et al.  Evaluating bone union of distal radius fractures by measuring impedance values. , 2009, Orthopedics.

[11]  B. Jakoby,et al.  Position-dependent characterization of bone tissue with electrical impedance spectroscopy , 2012, 2012 IEEE Sensors.

[12]  V Kulkarni,et al.  Impedence osteography: clinical applications of a new method of imaging fractures. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[13]  Michel M. Maharbiz,et al.  Impedance spectroscopy to monitor fracture healing , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[14]  H. J. G. GUNDERSEN,et al.  Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis , 1988, APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica.

[15]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  I. Cuthill,et al.  Reporting : The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research , 2010 .

[17]  Lutz Claes,et al.  BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders BioMed Central Correspondence , 2007 .

[18]  T. Einhorn,et al.  Production of a standard closed fracture in laboratory animal bone , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  Diane Hu,et al.  A model for intramembranous ossification during fracture healing , 2002, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[20]  R Wytch,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography: a review of current literature. , 1994, European journal of radiology.

[21]  Ralph S. Marcucio,et al.  Fracture Repair and Bone Grafting , 2011 .

[22]  Vivek Subramanian,et al.  Impedance sensing device enables early detection of pressure ulcers in vivo , 2015, Nature Communications.

[23]  Toby King,et al.  The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States. , 2016, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[24]  G. Paiement,et al.  The importance of the blood supply in the healing of tibial fractures. , 1995, Contemporary orthopaedics.

[25]  J R Mallard,et al.  Impedance imaging in upper arm fractures. , 1990, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[26]  R. Sundararajan,et al.  Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy Study of Biological Tissues. , 2008, Journal of electrostatics.

[27]  S. P. Whiley Evaluating fracture healing using digital X-ray image analysis , 2011 .

[28]  H. Frost,et al.  The biology of fracture healing. An overview for clinicians. Part I. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  B. Mckibbin,et al.  The biology of fracture healing in long bones. , 1978, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[30]  Saam Morshed,et al.  Current Options for Determining Fracture Union , 2014, Advances in medicine.

[31]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. , 1998, Bone.

[32]  F. Bakker,et al.  The reliability of plain radiography in experimental fracture healing , 2001, Skeletal Radiology.

[33]  Toshikazu Kubo,et al.  Assessment of distraction callus in rabbits by monitoring of the electrical impedance of bone , 2010, Acta orthopaedica.

[34]  D.I. Fotiadis,et al.  Ultrasonic monitoring of bone fracture healing , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[35]  Toshikazu Kubo,et al.  Measurement of bone electrical impedance in fracture healing , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[36]  Shanmugasundaram Kumaravel,et al.  Monitoring of fracture healing by electrical conduction: A new diagnostic procedure , 2012, Indian journal of orthopaedics.

[37]  Berrin Zuhal Altunkaynak,et al.  A novel application for the cavalieri principle: a stereological and methodological study. , 2009, The Eurasian journal of medicine.

[38]  N. Takenaka,et al.  Ability and Limitation of Radiographic Assessment of Fracture Healing in Rats , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[39]  E. Vuorio,et al.  A standardized experimental fracture in the mouse tibia , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.