The Columbine Victims and the Myth of the Juvenile Superpredator

This study examines the news media coverage of the 1999 Columbine school shootings, as a component of a noted crime myth of the juvenile superpredator. Thematic content analysis was conducted on 683 articles selected from print and broadcast media, revealing four themes of coverage, including the identification and description of the victims, details of victims' deaths, coverage of memorial services, and other special social issues such as race, religion, and gun control. Chronological analysis of article distribution revealed four spikes in volume of coverage, which is associated with media reframing of the victims coverage to maintain the salience of the story. The Columbine victim coverage reaffirms the crime myth of the juvenile superpredator and reifies the punitive juvenile justice solutions suggested in alarmist responses to erroneous fears about growing rates and severity of youth violence. The impact of the superpredator myth on public discourse about Columbine and similar cases is explored.

[1]  Hsiang Iris Chyi,et al.  Media Salience and the Process of Framing: Coverage of the Columbine School Shootings , 2004 .

[2]  Katherine S. Newman,et al.  Rampage: The Social Roots Of School Shootings , 2004 .

[3]  Jennifer Paff Ogle,et al.  Appearance Cues and the Shootings at Columbine High: Construction of a Social Problem in the Print Media , 2003 .

[4]  Kathie Reid.  DEADLY LESSONS: Understanding Lethal School Violence , 2003 .

[5]  B. Maguire,et al.  Network news coverage of school shootings , 2002 .

[6]  David L. Altheide.  Children and the Discourse of Fear , 2002 .

[7]  Anthony A. Braga,et al.  Deadly Lessons: Understanding Lethal School Violence. , 2002 .

[8]  Salma I. Ghanem,et al.  The Convergence of Agenda Setting and Framing , 2001 .

[9]  August E. Grant,et al.  Framing public life : perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world , 2001 .

[10]  Jr. James W.Tankard.  The Empirical Approach to the Study of Media Framing , 2001 .

[11]  H. Chaiklin.  The Culture of Fear: Why Americans Are Afraid of the Wrong Things. , 2000 .

[12]  Charles Crawford,et al.  School shootings, the media, and public fear: Ingredientsfor a moral panic , 1999 .

[13]  Misty Bernall.  She Said Yes: The Unlikely Martyrdom of Cassie Bernall , 1999 .

[14]  J. Best.  Victimization and the victim industry , 1997 .

[15]  Gary Potter,et al.  The mythology of crime and criminal justice , 1996 .

[16]  David L. Altheide.  Qualitative Media Analysis , 1996 .

[17]  M. McCombs,et al.  CAPACITY, DIVERSITY, AND VOLATILITY OF THE PUBLIC AGENDA TRENDS FROM 1954 TO 1994 , 1995 .

[18]  S. Chermak.  Victims In The News: Crime And The American News Media , 1995 .

[19]  T. V. Dijk.  News as Discourse , 1990 .

[20]  J. Best.  Rhetoric in Claims-Making: Constructing the Missing Children Problem , 1987 .

[21]  David L. Altheide.  Ethnographic Content Analysis , 1987 .

[22]  Erving Goffman,et al.  Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. , 1979 .

[23]  D. Shaw,et al.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1972 .

[24]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .