On the Application of Motivation Theory to Human Factors/Ergonomics

Objective: Motivation is a driving force in human–technology interaction. This paper represents an effort to (a) describe a theoretical model of motivation in human technology interaction, (b) provide design principles and guidelines based on this theory, and (c) describe a sequence of steps for the evaluation of motivational factors in human–technology interaction. Background: Motivation theory has been relatively neglected in human factors/ergonomics (HF/E). In both research and practice, the (implicit) assumption has been that the operator is already motivated or that motivation is an organizational concern and beyond the purview of HF/E. However, technology can induce task-related boredom (e.g., automation) that can be stressful and also increase system vulnerability to performance failures. Method: A theoretical model of motivation in human–technology interaction is proposed, based on extension of the self-determination theory of motivation to HF/E. This model provides the basis for both future research and for development of practical recommendations for design. Results: General principles and guidelines for motivational design are described as well as a sequence of steps for the design process. Conclusion: Human motivation is an important concern for HF/E research and practice. Procedures in the design of both simple and complex technologies can, and should, include the evaluation of motivational characteristics of the task, interface, or system. In addition, researchers should investigate these factors in specific human–technology domains. Application: The theory, principles, and guidelines described here can be incorporated into existing techniques for task analysis and for interface and system design.

[1]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Hedonomics: The Power of Positive and Pleasurable Ergonomics , 2005 .

[2]  Leif R. Hedman,et al.  Engaging in Activities Involving Information Technology: Dimensions, Modes, and Flow , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[3]  H. Gr.  Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload; a cognitive-energetical framework. , 1997 .

[4]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[5]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Analysis of exploratory, manipulatory, and curiosity behaviors. , 1957, Psychological review.

[6]  Sebastian Ehrlichmann.  Introduction To Human Factors Engineering 2nd Edition , 2016 .

[7]  E. Deci,et al.  On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  William R. King,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Martin F. Lynch,et al.  Computer-assisted intervention improves patient-centered diabetes care by increasing autonomy support. , 2007, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[10]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Decision and stress , 1971 .

[11]  R. Vallerand.  Toward A Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 1997 .

[12]  James L. Szalma,et al.  Task Loading and Stress in Human–Computer Interaction: Theoretical Frameworks and Mitigation Strategies , 2009 .

[13]  Eeva M. Pilke.  Flow experiences in information technology use , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[14]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[15]  Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .

[16]  John W. Atkinson,et al.  Introduction: Motivation , 1964 .

[17]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[18]  Paul Strauss.  Human Factors In Engineering And Design , 2016 .

[19]  Richard,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace , 2022 .

[20]  Polona Vilar.  Usability Engineering: Process, Products and Examples , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  G. R. J. Hockey.  Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[22]  William S. Marras.  Bored beyond Belief: How Automation is Boring us to Distraction , 2010 .

[23]  Timo Partala,et al.  Psychological needs and virtual worlds: Case Second Life , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[24]  Erin K. Chiou,et al.  Contextual Design of a Motivated Medication Management Device , 2014 .

[25]  Denham L. Phipps.  The human–computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications (3rd ed) , 2013 .

[26]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[27]  Richard M. Ryan,et al.  Beyond Talk: Creating Autonomous Motivation through Self-Determination Theory , 2009 .

[28]  E. A. Locke,et al.  New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory , 2006 .

[29]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction: disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Emotional design , 2004, UBIQ.

[31]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the role of basic psychological needs in personality and the organization of behavior. , 2008 .

[32]  Anne Collins McLaughlin,et al.  Putting Fun into Video Games for Older Adults , 2012 .

[33]  Jessi L. Smith,et al.  Interest and self-regulation: Understanding individual variability in choices, efforts, and persistence over time. , 2010 .

[34]  P. Hekkert,et al.  Design and emotion : the experience of everyday things , 2004 .

[35]  Andrew K. Przybylski,et al.  Competence-impeding electronic games and players' aggressive feelings, thoughts, and behaviors. , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  J. S. Gray,et al.  Monotony and Boredom. , 1952 .

[37]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[38]  C. Carver,et al.  On the Self-Regulation of Behavior , 1998 .

[39]  Holger Luczak,et al.  Task Design and Motivation , 2006 .

[40]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Psychological needs as basic motives, not just experiential requirements. , 2009, Journal of personality.

[41]  E. Deci,et al.  Self‐determination theory and work motivation , 2005 .

[42]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Coherence and congruence: two aspects of personality integration. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[43]  E. A. Locke,et al.  New developments in and directions for goal-setting research. , 2007 .

[44]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[45]  A. Maslow.  A Theory of Human Motivation , 1943 .

[46]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[47]  Steven Pace,et al.  A grounded theory of the flow experiences of Web users , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[48]  A.W.K. Gaillard,et al.  Operator Functional State: The Assessment and Prediction of Human Performance Degradation in Complex Tasks , 2003 .

[49]  O. John,et al.  Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 2nd ed. , 1999 .

[50]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: the self-concordance model. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  M. Scerbo.  What's so boring about vigilance? , 1998 .

[52]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[53]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Integrating behavioral-motive and experiential-requirement perspectives on psychological needs: a two process model. , 2011, Psychological review.

[54]  G. Matthews.  Human Performance: Cognition, Stress and Individual Differences , 2000 .

[55]  R P Smith,et al.  Cisplatin and its analogues in the treatment of advanced breast cancer: a review. , 1992, British Journal of Cancer.

[56]  C. Carver,et al.  On the Self-Regulation of Behavior , 1998 .

[57]  Martin G Helander,et al.  Hedonomics—affective human factors design , 2003, Ergonomics.

[58]  P. Hancock,et al.  In search of vigilance: the problem of iatrogenically created psychological phenomena. , 2013, The American psychologist.

[59]  Joshua M. Smyth,et al.  Beyond Self-Selection in Video Game Play: An Experimental Examination of the Consequences of Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Game Play , 2007, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[60]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[61]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  The Independent Effects of Goal Contents and Motives on Well-Being: It’s Both What You Pursue and Why You Pursue It , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[62]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[63]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  Wanting, having, and needing: integrating motive disposition theory and self-determination theory. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  Andrew K. Przybylski,et al.  A Motivational Model of Video Game Engagement , 2010 .

[65]  R. W. White.  Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. , 1959, Psychological review.

[66]  E. Deci,et al.  Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. , 1994, Journal of personality.

[67]  Wendy Olphert,et al.  Getting what you want, or wanting what you get? Beyond user centred design , 2003 .

[68]  Mark S. Sanders,et al.  Human factors in engineering and design, 7th ed. , 1993 .

[69]  Cynthia D. Fisherl.  Boredom at Work: A Neglected Concept , 1993 .

[70]  D. Cicchetti.  Emotion and Adaptation , 1993 .

[71]  I. Illich.  Tools for Conviviality , 1973 .

[72]  Andrew K. Przybylski,et al.  The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach , 2006 .

[73]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[74]  Rick H. Hoyle,et al.  Handbook of personality and self-regulation , 2010 .

[75]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Boredom and Distraction in Multiple Unmanned Vehicle Supervisory Control , 2013, Interact. Comput..

[76]  B. Schwartz.  The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less , 2004 .

[77]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Human factors in simple and complex systems , 1993 .

[78]  E. Deci,et al.  Testing a self-determination theory process model for promoting glycemic control through diabetes self-management. , 2004, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[79]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  The role of perceived organizational support, distributive justice and motivation in reactions to new information technology , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[80]  Brian Shackel,et al.  Ergonomics in design for usability , 1986 .

[81]  P. Jordan.  Human factors for pleasure in product use. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[82]  Tibert Verhagen,et al.  Understanding users' motivations to engage in virtual worlds: A multipurpose model and empirical testing , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[83]  Jim Thompson.  More than meets the eye. Exploring opportunities for new products, which may aid us emotionally as well as physically , 2003 .

[84]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation , 2011, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[85]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[86]  R. Hockey.  Stress and fatigue in human performance , 1984 .

[87]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Chapter 4 – The Usability Engineering Lifecycle , 1993 .

[88]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[89]  James L. Szalma,et al.  Individual differences in human–technology interaction: incorporating variation in human characteristics into human factors and ergonomics research and design , 2009 .

[90]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[91]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  Work motivation: Forging new perspectives and directions in the post-millennium. , 2008 .

[92]  Ken Eason,et al.  Towards the experimental study of usability , 1984 .

[93]  Jessi L. Smith,et al.  Interest and self-regulation: The relation between having to and wanting to , 2000 .

[94]  Juliane Jung,et al.  Understanding Motivation And Emotion , 2016 .

[95]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[96]  C. Sansone,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation : the search for optimal motivation and performance , 2000 .

[97]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[98]  P. Hancock,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Stress and Sustained Attention , 1989, Human factors.

[99]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[100]  J B Long,et al.  People and computers: designing for usability , 1986 .

[101]  A T Welford,et al.  Stress and performance. , 1973, Ergonomics.