Simulation of an enhanced gas recovery field trial for coal mine gas management

Abstract Coal mine gas management has evolved from being predominantly dependant on mine ventilation systems to utilising sophisticated surface based directional drilling for pre-drainage of coal seams. However the advent of enhanced gas recovery techniques in the coalbed methane industry has provided an opportunity to address gas management objectives hitherto impractical. Specifically: achieving very low residual gas contents to mitigate against frictional ignitions and fugitive emissions; the means to accelerate gas drainage to accommodate mine schedule changes; and to enable pre-drainage of coal reserves with very low permeability. This article examines a possible enhanced gas recovery field trial at an Australian mine site. Production data from four surface to inseam medium radius gas drainage boreholes was modelled and history matched. The resulting reservoir characteristics were then used to model the performance of the boreholes using an enhanced recovery technique. One of the boreholes is modelled as an (nitrogen) injection well and two flanking wells are modelled as production wells. The model results suggest that accelerated gas flow rates as well as very low residual gas contents are achievable using typical coal mine gas drainage infrastructure and goaf inertisation systems.

[1]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Comparison of adsorption models in reservoir simulation of enhanced coalbed methane recovery and CO2 sequestration in coal , 2009 .

[2]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  Selective transport of CO2, CH4, and N2 in coals: insights from modeling of experimental gas adsorption data , 2004 .

[3]  W. V. Pinczewski,et al.  Economic Evaluation of Nitrogen Injection for Coalseam Gas Recovery , 1993 .

[4]  I. Gray,et al.  Reservoir Engineering in Coal Seams: Part 1-The Physical Process of Gas Storage and Movement in Coal Seams , 1987 .

[5]  Wang Zhaofeng,et al.  Experimental study on technology of accelerating methane release by nitrogen injection in coalbed , 2010 .

[6]  G. R. King,et al.  Numerical simulation of the transient behavior of coal-seam degasification wells , 1986 .

[7]  D. Law,et al.  Numerical Simulator Comparison Study for Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery Processes, Part I: Pure Carbon Dioxide Injection , 2002 .

[8]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  Drawdown Induced Changes in Permeability of Coalbeds: A New Interpretation of the Reservoir Response to Primary Recovery , 2004 .

[9]  Lincoln Paterson,et al.  Relative Permeability in Coal , 1996 .

[10]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  A model for changes in coalbed permeability during primary and enhanced methane, recovery , 2005 .

[11]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  A reservoir simulation study of CO2 injection and N2 flooding at the Ishikari coalfield CO2 storage pilot project, Japan , 2008 .

[12]  Ian Palmer,et al.  Permeability changes in coal: Analytical modeling , 2009 .

[13]  Ye Dan,et al.  Gas sorption on coal and measurement of gas content , 1993 .

[14]  William D. Gunter,et al.  Alberta Multiwell Micro-Pilot Testing for CBM Properties, Enhanced Methane Recovery and CO2 Storage Potential , 2004 .

[15]  Paul S. Schafer,et al.  A guide to coalbed methane reservoir engineering , 1996 .