Cross-Modal Sensory Integration of Visual-Tactile Motion Information: Instrument Design and Human Psychophysics

Information obtained from multiple sensory modalities, such as vision and touch, is integrated to yield a holistic percept. As a haptic approach usually involves cross-modal sensory experiences, it is necessary to develop an apparatus that can characterize how a biological system integrates visual-tactile sensory information as well as how a robotic device infers object information emanating from both vision and touch. In the present study, we develop a novel visual-tactile cross-modal integration stimulator that consists of an LED panel to present visual stimuli and a tactile stimulator with three degrees of freedom that can present tactile motion stimuli with arbitrary motion direction, speed, and indentation depth in the skin. The apparatus can present cross-modal stimuli in which the spatial locations of visual and tactile stimulations are perfectly aligned. We presented visual-tactile stimuli in which the visual and tactile directions were either congruent or incongruent, and human observers reported the perceived visual direction of motion. Results showed that perceived direction of visual motion can be biased by the direction of tactile motion when visual signals are weakened. The results also showed that the visual-tactile motion integration follows the rule of temporal congruency of multi-modal inputs, a fundamental property known for cross-modal integration.

[1]  G. Essick,et al.  Tactile motion activates the human middle temporal/V5 (MT/V5) complex , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[2]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Merging the senses into a robust percept , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  J. Craig,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Tactile Motion Integration in Somatosensory Cortex , 2011, Neuron.

[4]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Touch can change visual slant perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Juhani Hyvärinen,et al.  Distribution of visual and somatic functions in the parietal associative area 7 of the monkey , 1979, Brain Research.

[6]  T. Stanford,et al.  Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Martin V. Butz,et al.  Remapping motion across modalities: tactile rotations influence visual motion judgments , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  B. Stein,et al.  Determinants of multisensory integration in superior colliculus neurons. I. Temporal factors , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Tactile Rivalry Demonstrated with an Ambiguous Apparent-Motion Quartet , 2008, Current Biology.

[10]  B. Stein,et al.  Interactions among converging sensory inputs in the superior colliculus. , 1983, Science.

[11]  G. Essick,et al.  Factors influencing cutaneous directional sensitivity: A correlative psychophysical and neurophysiological investigation , 1985, Brain Research Reviews.

[12]  H. McGurk,et al.  Hearing lips and seeing voices , 1976, Nature.

[13]  B. Stein,et al.  Spatial factors determine the activity of multisensory neurons in cat superior colliculus , 1986, Brain Research.

[14]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  A dense array stimulator to generate arbitrary spatio-temporal tactile stimuli , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Multisensory Integration in Macaque Visual Cortex Depends on Cue Reliability , 2008, Neuron.

[16]  Kenith V. Sobel,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Neural Synergy Between Kinetic Vision and Touch , 2022 .

[17]  C. Spence,et al.  Visuo-tactile links in covert exogenous spatial attention remap across changes in unseen hand posture , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  H. S. Wolff,et al.  iRun: Horizontal and Vertical Shape of a Region-Based Graph Compression , 2022, Sensors.

[19]  A. Pouget,et al.  Reference frames for representing visual and tactile locations in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Christopher R Fetsch,et al.  Neural correlates of reliability-based cue weighting during multisensory integration , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Tony Ro,et al.  Human MST But Not MT Responds to Tactile Stimulation , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  A rotating drum stimulator for scanning embossed patterns and textures across the skin , 1988, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  Monica Gori,et al.  Cross-Sensory Facilitation Reveals Neural Interactions between Visual and Tactile Motion in Humans , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[24]  J Hyvärinen,et al.  Regional distribution of functions in parietal association area 7 of the monkey. , 1981, Brain research.

[25]  Charles Spence,et al.  Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Multisensory integration, perception and ecological validity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Michael S Beauchamp,et al.  See me, hear me, touch me: multisensory integration in lateral occipital-temporal cortex , 2005, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[28]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Sound alters visual motion perception , 1997, Nature.

[29]  S S Hsiao,et al.  The tactile integration of local motion cues is analogous to its visual counterpart , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Juhani Hyva¨rinen Regional distribution of functions in parietal association area 7 of the monkey , 1981, Brain Research.

[31]  J. H. Killebrew,et al.  Influence of visual motion on tactile motion perception. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  R. Jacobs,et al.  Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth , 1999, Vision Research.

[33]  James M. Hillis,et al.  Slant from texture and disparity cues: optimal cue combination. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[34]  C. Spence,et al.  Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[35]  C. Spence,et al.  Audiotactile interactions in roughness perception , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[36]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[37]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory Integration: Space, Time and Superadditivity , 2005, Current Biology.

[38]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Motion Aftereffects Transfer between Touch and Vision , 2009, Current Biology.

[39]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.