Consensus report on the future of animal-free systemic toxicity testing.

Since March 2013, animal use for cosmetics testing for the European market has been banned. This requires a renewed view on risk assessment in this field. However, in other fields as well, traditional animal experimentation does not always satisfy requirements in safety testing, as the need for human-relevant information is ever increasing. A general strategy for animal-free test approaches was outlined by the US National Research Council`s vision document for Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century in 2007. It is now possible to provide a more defined roadmap on how to implement this vision for the four principal areas of systemic toxicity evaluation: repeat dose organ toxicity, carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity and allergy induction (skin sensitization), as well as for the evaluation of toxicant metabolism (toxicokinetics) (Fig. 1). CAAT-Europe assembled experts from Europe, America and Asia to design a scientific roadmap for future risk assessment approaches and the outcome was then further discussed and refined in two consensus meetings with over 200 stakeholders. The key recommendations include: focusing on improving existing methods rather than favoring de novo design; combining hazard testing with toxicokinetics predictions; developing integrated test strategies; incorporating new high content endpoints to classical assays; evolving test validation procedures; promoting collaboration and data-sharing of different industrial sectors; integrating new disciplines, such as systems biology and high throughput screening; and involving regulators early on in the test development process. A focus on data quality, combined with increased attention to the scientific background of a test method, will be important drivers. Information from each test system should be mapped along adverse outcome pathways. Finally, quantitative information on all factors and key events will be fed into systems biology models that allow a probabilistic risk assessment with flexible adaptation to exposure scenarios and individual risk factors.

[1]  Sebastian Hoffmann,et al.  Evidence-based toxicology for the 21st century: opportunities and challenges. , 2013, ALTEX.

[2]  Gerberick Frank,et al.  The intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility and predictivity of the KeratinoSens assay to predict skin sensitizers in vitro: results of a ring-study in five laboratories. , 2011, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[3]  M Balls,et al.  Novel Advanced In Vitro Methods for Long-term Toxicity Testing , 2001, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[4]  Imran Shah,et al.  Using pathway modules as targets for assay development in xenobiotic screening. , 2012, Molecular bioSystems.

[5]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Food for Thought ... on mapping the human toxome. , 2011, ALTEX.

[6]  Chihae Yang,et al.  Novel technologies and an overall strategy to allow hazard assessment and risk prediction of chemicals, cosmetics, and drugs with animal-free methods. , 2012, ALTEX.

[7]  Arti Ahluwalia,et al.  An in vitro model of glucose and lipid metabolism in a multicompartmental bioreactor , 2012, Biotechnology journal.

[8]  Harvey J Clewell,et al.  PBTK modelling platforms and parameter estimation tools to enable animal-free risk assessment: recommendations from a joint EPAA--EURL ECVAM ADME workshop. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[9]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Phenotypic screening of the ToxCast chemical library to classify toxic and therapeutic mechanisms , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[10]  Martin Stephens,et al.  Mechanistic validation. , 2013, ALTEX.

[11]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Food for thought ... on alternative methods for cosmetics safety testing. , 2008, ALTEX.

[12]  H. Sakaguchi,et al.  Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines: the human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT). I. Optimization of the h-CLAT protocol. , 2006, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[13]  T Hartung,et al.  Transcriptional and metabolic adaptation of human neurons to the mitochondrial toxicant MPP+ , 2014, Cell Death and Disease.

[14]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Re-evaluation of animal numbers and costs for in vivo tests to accomplish REACH legislation requirements for chemicals - a report by the transatlantic think tank for toxicology (t(4)). , 2009, ALTEX.

[15]  L. Smirnova,et al.  Developmental neurotoxicity - challenges in the 21st century and in vitro opportunities. , 2014, ALTEX.

[16]  T. Hartung Toxicology for the twenty-first century , 2009, Nature.

[17]  Bas J Blaauboer,et al.  An expert consortium review of the EC-commissioned report "alternative (Non-Animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects - 2010". , 2011, ALTEX.

[18]  A H Piersma,et al.  Evaluation of an alternative in vitro test battery for detecting reproductive toxicants. , 2013, Reproductive toxicology.

[19]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  A Modular Approach to the ECVAM Principles on Test Validity , 2004, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[20]  Weida Tong,et al.  Toward predictive models for drug-induced liver injury in humans: are we there yet? , 2014, Biomarkers in medicine.

[21]  P Smith,et al.  Concordance of the toxicity of pharmaceuticals in humans and in animals. , 2000, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[22]  Gian Paolo Rossini,et al.  Towards tailored assays for cell-based approaches to toxicity testing. , 2012, ALTEX.

[23]  A. M. Api,et al.  Allergic contact dermatitis: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, in vitro methods and regulatory aspects , 2011, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[24]  J S Jaworska,et al.  Bayesian analysis and inference from QSAR predictive model results , 2002, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[25]  L. Smirnova,et al.  Metabolomics in toxicology and preclinical research. , 2013, ALTEX.

[26]  Martin Paparella,et al.  Uncertainty of testing methods--what do we (want to) know? , 2013, ALTEX.

[27]  Harvey J Clewell,et al.  Can case study approaches speed implementation of the NRC report: "toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy?". , 2011, ALTEX.

[28]  R. Blust,et al.  Feasibility study of the zebrafish assay as an alternative method to screen for developmental toxicity and embryotoxicity using a training set of 27 compounds. , 2012, Reproductive toxicology.

[29]  M. Leist,et al.  Food for thought... on the real success of 3R approaches. , 2008, ALTEX.

[30]  F. Oesch,et al.  New Hepatocyte In Vitro Systems for Drug Metabolism: Metabolic Capacity and Recommendations for Application in Basic Research and Drug Development, Standard Operation Procedures , 2003, Drug metabolism reviews.

[31]  Jennifer Seed,et al.  Current and future needs for developmental toxicity testing. , 2011, Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology.

[32]  Andreas Natsch,et al.  The Nrf2-Keap1-ARE toxicity pathway as a cellular sensor for skin sensitizers--functional relevance and a hypothesis on innate reactions to skin sensitizers. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[33]  Robert J Kavlock,et al.  Developmental toxicity testing for safety assessment: new approaches and technologies. , 2011, Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology.

[34]  Paul Jennings,et al.  An overview of transcriptional regulation in response to toxicological insult , 2012, Archives of Toxicology.

[35]  Thomas Knudsen,et al.  Predictive models and computational toxicology. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[36]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Food for Thought … Systems Toxicology , 2012 .

[37]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Inflammatory findings on species extrapolations: humans are definitely no 70-kg mice , 2013, Archives of Toxicology.

[38]  H. Sakaguchi,et al.  Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines; human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT). II. An inter-laboratory study of the h-CLAT. , 2006, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[39]  A. Knight Animal experiments scrutinised: systematic reviews demonstrate poor human clinical and toxicological utility. , 2007, ALTEX.

[40]  Liang Zhao,et al.  Mapping the human toxome by systems toxicology. , 2014, Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology.

[41]  D. Dix,et al.  The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[42]  A. Piersma,et al.  The embryonic stem cell test combined with toxicogenomics as an alternative testing model for the assessment of developmental toxicity. , 2011, Reproductive toxicology.

[43]  Sebastian Hoffmann,et al.  Integrated Testing Strategy (ITS) - Opportunities to better use existing data and guide future testing in toxicology. , 2010, ALTEX.

[44]  C. Alden,et al.  A Critical Appraisal of the Value of the Mouse Cancer Bioassay in Safety Assessment , 1996, Toxicologic pathology.

[45]  Bas J Blaauboer,et al.  The use of biomarkers of toxicity for integrating in vitro hazard estimates into risk assessment for humans. , 2012, ALTEX.

[46]  Lee Niswander,et al.  Mechanisms of tissue fusion during development , 2012, Development.

[47]  T. Nash Chemical Carcinogenesis , 1957, Nature.

[48]  Petra S Kern,et al.  Integrating non-animal test information into an adaptive testing strategy - skin sensitization proof of concept case. , 2011, ALTEX.

[49]  Nicola J Hewitt,et al.  A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: genotoxicity. A COLIPA analysis. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[50]  Robert Landsiedel,et al.  Intralaboratory validation of four in vitro assays for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals. , 2011, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[51]  David M. Reif,et al.  Update on EPA's ToxCast program: providing high throughput decision support tools for chemical risk management. , 2012, Chemical research in toxicology.

[52]  J. G. Hengstler,et al.  Profiling of drugs and environmental chemicals for functional impairment of neural crest migration in a novel stem cell-based test battery , 2014, Archives of Toxicology.

[53]  James A. Glazier,et al.  A Multi-cell, Multi-scale Model of Vertebrate Segmentation and Somite Formation , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[54]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Food for thought ... on the evolution of toxicology and the phasing out of animal testing. , 2008, ALTEX.

[55]  Sebastian Hoffmann,et al.  Designing Validation Studies More Efficiently According to the Modular Approach: Retrospective Analysis of the EPISKIN Test for Skin Corrosion , 2006, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[56]  J. Glazier,et al.  3D quantitative analyses of angiogenic sprout growth dynamics , 2013, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[57]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  The dawning of a new age of toxicology. , 2008, ALTEX.

[58]  L. Knudsen Animal-free Toxicology: The Use of Human Tissue to Replace the Use of Animals — Examples from Human Biomonitoring and Human Placental Transport Studies , 2013, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[59]  Nisha S. Sipes,et al.  In vitro and modelling approaches to risk assessment from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ToxCast programme. , 2014, Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology.

[60]  R. Tyl,et al.  Critical evaluation of current developmental toxicity testing strategies: a case of babies and their bathwater. , 2011, Birth defects research. Part B, Developmental and reproductive toxicology.

[61]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  Perspectives on validation of high-throughput assays supporting 21st century toxicity testing. , 2013, ALTEX.

[62]  Michael Schwarz,et al.  The integrated project ReProTect: a novel approach in reproductive toxicity hazard assessment. , 2005, Reproductive toxicology.

[63]  Hilda Witters,et al.  The ReProTect Feasibility Study, a novel comprehensive in vitro approach to detect reproductive toxicants. , 2010, Reproductive toxicology.

[64]  Alexandra Maertens,et al.  Integrated testing strategies for safety assessments. , 2013, ALTEX.

[65]  Yi Li,et al.  Categorical QSAR Models for skin sensitization based upon local lymph node assay classification measures part 2: 4D-fingerprint three-state and two-2-state logistic regression models. , 2007, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[66]  Thomas Hartung,et al.  A Modular Approach to the Extended One-generation Reproduction Toxicity Study , 2009, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[67]  J. S. Jaworska,et al.  Chapter 22:Multiple Test In Silico Weight-of-Evidence for Toxicological Endpoints , 2010 .

[68]  Raivo Kolde,et al.  Test systems of developmental toxicity: state-of-the art and future perspectives , 2013, Archives of Toxicology.

[69]  Melvin E Andersen,et al.  A mechanistic redefinition of adverse effects - a key step in the toxicity testing paradigm shift. , 2010, ALTEX.

[70]  B. Ames,et al.  Paracelsus to parascience: the environmental cancer distraction. , 2000, Mutation research.

[71]  T. Knudsen,et al.  A roadmap for the development of alternative (non-animal) methods for systemic toxicity testing. , 2012, ALTEX.

[72]  David M. Reif,et al.  Zebrafish developmental screening of the ToxCast™ Phase I chemical library. , 2012, Reproductive toxicology.

[73]  C Helma,et al.  Data quality in predictive toxicology: reproducibility of rodent carcinogenicity experiments. , 2001, Environmental health perspectives.

[74]  D. Blacker Food for thought. , 2013, JAMA neurology.

[75]  Thomas W. Jefferson,et al.  Reproductive toxicology. , 2022, Reproductive toxicology.

[76]  David M. Reif,et al.  In Vitro Screening of Environmental Chemicals for Targeted Testing Prioritization: The ToxCast Project , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[77]  Hiroshi Itagaki,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of In Vitro Skin Sensitisation Tests: The Human Cell-line Activation Test (h-CLAT) versus the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) , 2010, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[78]  Timothy J Shafer,et al.  Developmental neurotoxicity testing: A path forward , 2012, Congenital anomalies.

[79]  Katy Taylor,et al.  A critique of the EC's expert (draft) reports on the status of alternatives for cosmetics testing to meet the 2013 deadline. , 2011, ALTEX.

[80]  Valérie Zuang,et al.  Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects—2010 , 2011, Archives of Toxicology.

[81]  Philippe Grandjean,et al.  Advancing the science of developmental neurotoxicity (DNT): testing for better safety evaluation. , 2012, ALTEX.

[82]  David M. Reif,et al.  Multidimensional in vivo hazard assessment using zebrafish. , 2014, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[83]  Silke Gabbert,et al.  Towards optimization of chemical testing under REACH: a Bayesian network approach to Integrated Testing Strategies. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[84]  F. Oesch,et al.  Interspecies differences in cancer susceptibility and toxicity. , 1999, Drug metabolism reviews.

[85]  Mardas Daneshian,et al.  Validation and quality control of replacement alternatives - Current status and future challenges , 2012 .

[86]  Jan G. Hengstler,et al.  Highlight report: towards the replacement of in vivo repeated dose systemic toxicity testing , 2011, Archives of Toxicology.

[87]  Robert Landsiedel,et al.  Putting the parts together: combining in vitro methods to test for skin sensitizing potentials. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[88]  Marcel Leist,et al.  Food for thought ... considerations and guidelines for basic test method descriptions in toxicology. , 2010, ALTEX.

[89]  Christian Beste,et al.  Translating neurobehavioural endpoints of developmental neurotoxicity tests into in vitro assays and readouts. , 2012, Neurotoxicology.

[90]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  ECVAM prevalidation of three cell transformation assays. , 2011, ALTEX.

[91]  T Hartung,et al.  Toward an evidence-based toxicology , 2006, Human & experimental toxicology.

[92]  Andrea E M Seiler,et al.  The validated embryonic stem cell test to predict embryotoxicity in vitro , 2011, Nature Protocols.

[93]  David Dix,et al.  A Computational Model Predicting Disruption of Blood Vessel Development , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[94]  Manuel C. Peitsch,et al.  Systems Toxicology: From Basic Research to Risk Assessment , 2014, Chemical research in toxicology.