Towards and Effective Implementation of Green Infrastructure in Rural Areas. Challenges and Options for a Substantial Integration with Spatial Planning

The EU Biodiversity Strategy towards 2020 envisages the creation of Green Infrastructure (GI), defined as a strategically planned network of natural and semi-natural areas with other environmental features designed and managed to deliver a wide range of ecosystem services (ES). Planning for GI requires spatially explicit approaches and methods and poses novel challenges to traditional spatial planning. This chapter elaborates on the challenges and options for the effective incorporation of GI’s objectives into planning by considering three may underpinning concepts of GI (1) the planning and management component; (2) the supply of multiple ES as the objective of GI; and (3) spatial connectivity as a key functional characteristic of GI. The main implications for spatial planning ensuing from effective considerations of these three aspects are discussed; issues and bottlenecks in mapping ES and in considering connectivity in planning are illustrated through examples. Results from recent literature is also used to illustrate and discuss different approaches in mapping and designing GI in different contexts, from broad scale analysis at European level to a more detailed example of GI planning at the local scale specific for agricultural areas.

[1]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Ecosystem services and connectivity in spatial conservation prioritization , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[3]  Louise Willemen,et al.  A visualization and data-sharing tool for ecosystem service maps: Lessons learnt, challenges and the way forward , 2015 .

[4]  Paul Beier,et al.  The Role of Landscape Connectivity in Planning and Implementing Conservation and Restoration Priorities. Issues in Ecology , 2012 .

[5]  Meredith Welch-Devine,et al.  Hard choices: Making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being , 2011 .

[6]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Mapping green infrastructure based on ecosystem services and ecological networks: A Pan-European case study , 2015 .

[7]  Wilhelm Windhorst,et al.  Landscapes' Capacities to Provide Ecosystem Services - a Concept for Land-Cover Based Assessments , 2009 .

[8]  Berien Elbersen,et al.  Semi-natural vegetation in agricultural land: European map and links to ecosystem service supply , 2014, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[9]  Göran Berndes,et al.  How to analyse ecosystem services in landscapes—A systematic review , 2017 .

[10]  Tibor Erős,et al.  How natural capital delivers ecosystem services: A typology derived from a systematic review , 2017 .

[11]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being , 2010 .

[12]  Carsten F. Dormann,et al.  Set-aside management: How do succession, sowing patterns and landscape context affect biodiversity? , 2011 .

[13]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  ESTIMAP: A GIS-BASED MODEL TO MAP ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION , 2014 .

[14]  B. Grizzetti,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union , 2012 .

[15]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  Ecosystem services classification: A systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework , 2017, Ecological indicators.

[16]  Jane Elith,et al.  Green Infrastructure Design Based on Spatial Conservation Prioritization and Modeling of Biodiversity Features and Ecosystem Services , 2015, Environmental Management.

[17]  William M. Adams,et al.  Biodiversity and Green Infrastructure in Europe: boundary object or ecological trap? , 2016 .

[18]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Linking Land Cover Data and Crop Yields for Mapping and Assessment of Pollination Services in Europe , 2013 .