Efficient online dictionary adaptation and image reconstruction for dynamic MRI

Sparsity-based techniques have yielded promising results for dynamic MRI (dMRI) reconstruction. Data-driven methods involving dictionary learning have become increasingly popular, but they involve expensive computation and memory requirements. We propose a framework for online or time-sequential data-driven reconstruction of dynamic MRI sequences from k-t space measurements recorded by one or more receive coils. The spatiotemporal patches of the underlying image sequence are modeled as sparse in a DIctioNary with lOw-ranK AToms (DINO-KAT), and the proposed method estimates the dictionary, sparse coefficients, and images sequentially and efficiently from the time series of MRI measurements. Our experiments demonstrate the promising performance of our schemes for online dMRI reconstruction from limited data.

[1]  A. Manduca,et al.  Local versus Global Low-Rank Promotion in Dynamic MRI Series Reconstruction , 2010 .

[2]  Kay Nehrke,et al.  k‐t PCA: Temporally constrained k‐t BLAST reconstruction using principal component analysis , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  MR Image Reconstruction From Highly Undersampled k-Space Data by Dictionary Learning , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Dictionary Learning and Time Sparsity for Dynamic MR Data Reconstruction , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Patrick L. Combettes,et al.  Signal Recovery by Proximal Forward-Backward Splitting , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[6]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Proximal Algorithms , 2013, Found. Trends Optim..

[7]  Justin P. Haldar,et al.  Spatiotemporal imaging with partially separable functions: A matrix recovery approach , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[8]  Daniel K Sodickson,et al.  Low‐rank plus sparse matrix decomposition for accelerated dynamic MRI with separation of background and dynamic components , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  k‐t FOCUSS: A general compressed sensing framework for high resolution dynamic MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  ADAPTIVE REAL-TIME CARDIAC MRI USING PARADISE: VALIDATION BY THE PHYSIOLOGICALLY IMPROVED NCAT PHANTOM , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[11]  Saiprasad Ravishankar,et al.  Online data-driven dynamic image restoration using DINO-KAT models , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[12]  Zhi-Pei Liang,et al.  SPATIOTEMPORAL IMAGINGWITH PARTIALLY SEPARABLE FUNCTIONS , 2007, 2007 4th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[13]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Yi Ma,et al.  Robust principal component analysis? , 2009, JACM.

[15]  Mathews Jacob,et al.  Blind Compressive Sensing Dynamic MRI , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Michael Lustig,et al.  k-t SPARSE: High frame rate dynamic MRI exploiting spatio-temporal sparsity , 2006 .

[17]  Justin P. Haldar,et al.  Low rank matrix recovery for real-time cardiac MRI , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[18]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Low-Rank and Adaptive Sparse Signal (LASSI) Models for Highly Accelerated Dynamic Imaging , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Zhi-Pei Liang,et al.  Spatiotemporal Imaging with Partially Separable Functions , 2007, 2007 Joint Meeting of the 6th International Symposium on Noninvasive Functional Source Imaging of the Brain and Heart and the International Conference on Functional Biomedical Imaging.