Technical note: Resterilizable noninvasive ankle distraction device.

Arthroscopic ankle surgery can be performed effectively and satisfactorily in the majority of procedures without distraction. However, there are cases in which joint distraction eases access to the pathology and, therefore, improves execution of the surgical procedure. We developed a simple resterilizable noninvasive distraction device that is cheap, gives reproducible results, and is easy to apply. The main advantage of the device is that the choice to perform distraction can be made at any moment during the arthroscopic procedure. Thus, the operation can start without distraction in the dorsiflexed position and, if needed at any time, the distraction device can be applied and vice versa. The effectiveness was assessed in a consecutive series of 25 patients. The average force of distraction was 115 N, while the average joint distraction was 4.5 mm on the medial and 4.3 mm on the lateral side.

[1]  C. V. van Dijk,et al.  Arthroscopy of the ankle joint. , 1997, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[2]  J. F. Guhl New concepts (distraction) in ankle arthroscopy. , 1988, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[3]  J. Tol,et al.  Arthroscopy for problems after ankle fracture. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  A. Amendola,et al.  Noninvasive ankle distraction: relationship between force, magnitude of distraction, and nerve conduction abnormalities. , 1996, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[5]  P. Scranton,et al.  Anterior Tibiotalar Spurs: A Comparison of Open versus Arthroscopic Debridement , 1992, Foot & ankle.

[6]  G. Njus,et al.  Ligament strain and ankle joint opening during ankle distraction. , 1992, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[7]  R. Boiardo,et al.  The use of an ankle joint distractor in ankle arthroscopy. , 1992, The Journal of foot surgery.

[8]  T. Ritzler,et al.  Arthroskopische Behandlung der Osteochondrosis dissecans der Talusrolle , 1998, Arthroskopie.

[9]  K. Feder,et al.  Ankle Arthroscopy: Review and Long-Term Results , 1992, Foot & ankle.

[10]  R. Ferkel,et al.  Neurological complications of ankle arthroscopy. , 1996, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[11]  R. Lloyd-Smith,et al.  Osteochondral lesions of the talus , 1993, The American journal of sports medicine.

[12]  C. Verheyen,et al.  A Prospective Study of Prognostic Factors Concerning the Outcome of Arthroscopic Surgery for Anterior Ankle Impingement , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  R. Ferkel,et al.  Arthroscopy of the ankle and foot. , 1993, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  S. E. Cameron Noninvasive distraction for ankle arthroscopy. , 1997, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[15]  A. Amendola,et al.  Ankle arthroscopy: outcome in 79 consecutive patients. , 1996, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.