Buyer's Efficient E-Sourcing Structure: Centralize or Decentralize?

Strategic sourcing, defined as a firm's key business process to identify, evaluate, configure, and negotiate purchases in important spend categories while managing long-term supplier relationships, is playing a significant role in sourcing strategies. The adoption of e-sourcing, defined as the use of business software (for example, using application service providers to conduct online procurement auctions) to automate or augment the aforementioned key business process, has been growing rapidly in recent years. One often-cited benefit of e-sourcing is the predicted savings, which is appealing, given the increasing pressure on cost competitiveness faced by firms. Using queuing techniques, this paper develops an economic model that captures fundamental trade-offs in a firm's e-sourcing business process as characterized by communication complexity, frequency of use, and cost of delay. This allows comparisons of two widely adopted structures for e-sourcing: the centralized structure versus the decentralized structure. Conditions under which the centralized structure is favored over the decentralized structure and vice versa are identified and illustrated with numerical examples and case evidence. These findings are robust in other settings. The paper concludes with a discussion of managerial implications.

[1]  Dimitri Vayanos,et al.  The decentralization of information processing in the presence of interactions , 2003 .

[2]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Models for Iterative Multiattribute Procurement Auctions , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Anthony J. Dukes,et al.  Best Practices for Online Procurement Intermediaries , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[4]  Alan Beggs,et al.  Queues and Hierarchies , 2001 .

[5]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Integrating Long- and Short-Term Contracting via Business-to-Business Exchanges for Capital-Intensive Industries , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[6]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Learning in ERP contracting: a principal-agent analysis , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[7]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  B2B E-Commerce Revisited: Leading Perspectives on the Key Issues and Research Directions , 2002, Electron. Mark..

[8]  H.L. Lee,et al.  Aligning Supply Chain Strategies with Product Uncertainties , 2002, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[9]  R. Faure,et al.  Introduction to operations research , 1968 .

[10]  Daniel Granot,et al.  Formation of Alliances in Internet-Based Supply Exchanges , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Hau L. Lee The triple-A supply chain. , 2004, Harvard business review.

[12]  Kevin Zhu,et al.  Information Transparency of Business-to-Business Electronic Markets: A Game-Theoretic Analysis , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Haim Mendelson,et al.  Pricing and Priority Auctions in Queueing Systems with a Generalized Delay Cost Structure , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[14]  Eli M. Snir Multi-attribute , Online , Descending-Price , Procurement Auctions , 2004 .

[15]  Rajiv Kohli,et al.  Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Abraham Seidmann,et al.  Managing Online Auctions: Current Business and Research Issues , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[17]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Competitive Options, Supply Contracting, and Electronic Markets , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Robin Roundy,et al.  Efficient Auction Mechanisms for Supply Chain Procurement , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Jian Chen,et al.  A Multi-attribute Combinatorial Auction Approach to Electronic Procurement Mechanism Design , 2005 .

[20]  Tunay I. Tunca,et al.  Supply Auctions and Relational Contracts for Procurement , 2006, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[21]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[22]  P. Bolton,et al.  The firm as a communication network , 1994 .

[23]  Phillip L. Carter,et al.  The Role of Reverse Auctions in Strategic Sourcing , 2003 .

[24]  Ramayya Krishnan,et al.  E-Business and Management Science: Mutual Impacts (Part 2 of 2) , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Jérémie Gallien,et al.  A Smart Market for Industrial Procurement with Capacity Constraints , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Colin M. Campbell,et al.  Search and Collusion in Electronic Markets , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[27]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Codifiability, Relationship-Specific Information Technology Investment, and Optimal Contracting , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  M. Fisher What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product , 1997 .

[29]  Ramayya Krishnan,et al.  E-Business and Management Science: Mutual Impacts (Part 2 of 2) , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[30]  S. Raghavan,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Electronic Markets , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[31]  Milton Harris,et al.  Organization Design , 2000, Manag. Sci..

[32]  R. Radner The organization of decentralized information processing , 1993 .

[33]  F. S. Hillier,et al.  Introduction to Operations Research, 10th ed. , 1986 .

[34]  William Grey,et al.  The role of e-marketplaces in relationship-based supply chains: A survey , 2005, IBM Syst. J..