Forest Service-- National AgroforestryCenter 1-1-2012 Concentrated Flow Paths in Riparian Buffer Zones of Southern Illinois

Riparian buffers in agricultural landscapes should be designed to trap pollutants in overland flow by slowing, filtering, and infiltrating surface runoff entering the buffer via sheet flow. However, observational evidence suggests that concentrated flow is prevalent from agricultural fields. Over time sediment can accumulate in riparian buffers forming berms that restrict sheet flow; these berms ultimately back up surface runoff, resulting in an eventual breakthrough that concentrates overland flow. This study examines the occurrence of concentrated flow paths (CFPs) in riparian buffers at both the field and watershed scale. At the field scale, intensive topographic surveys were conducted at ten field sites in southern Illinois. To assess the prevalence of CFPs at the watershed scale, three watersheds in southern Illinois were selected for walking stream surveys along randomly selected 1,000 m reaches. CFPs were identified in all topographic surveys and all walking stream surveys. Among field sites, concentrated flow accounted for 82.5–100% of the drainage leaving the agricultural fields. Sediment berm accumulation was identified at all field sites and was positively correlated with CFP size. At the watershed scale, CFPs were more abundant in agricultural areas compared to forested land. Results from this study indicate that concentrated flow was prevalent across all study sites at both the field and watershed scale. Thus, surface water quality may suffer in areas with poorly functioning buffers, and managers must consider the occurrence of CFPs when designing and maintaining riparian buffers to protect stream water quality.

[1]  E. Alberts,et al.  Transport of Sediment Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Runoff through Cornstalk Residue Strips 1 , 1981 .

[2]  J. Schoonover,et al.  Nutrient Attenuation in Agricultural Surface Runoff by Riparian Buffer Zones in Southern Illinois, USA , 2005, Agroforestry Systems.

[3]  David A. Kovacic,et al.  Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water‐quality restoration and stream management , 1993 .

[4]  J. Lyons,et al.  GRASS VERSUS TREES: MANAGING RIPARIAN AREAS TO BENEFIT STREAMS OF CENTRAL NORTH AMERICA 1 , 2000 .

[5]  R. C. Schultz,et al.  Nutrient and sediment removal by switchgrass and cool-season grass filter strips in Central Iowa, USA , 1998, Agroforestry Systems.

[6]  Saied Mostaghimi,et al.  Vegetative Filter Strips for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Control , 1989 .

[7]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  Endangered Ecosystems of the United States: A Preliminary Assessment of Loss and Degradation , 1996, Restoration & Management Notes.

[8]  Richard M. Cruse,et al.  Vegetative filter strip effects on sediment concentration in cropland runoff , 1996 .

[9]  L. E. Asmussen,et al.  Riparian Forests as Nutrient Filters in Agricultural Watersheds , 1984 .

[10]  M. Dosskey,et al.  Toward Quantifying Water Pollution Abatement in Response to Installing Buffers on Crop Land , 2001, Environmental management.

[11]  James J. Zaczek,et al.  Agricultural Sediment Reduction by Giant Cane and Forest Riparian Buffers , 2006 .

[12]  S. Platt,et al.  Canebrakes: An Ecological and Historical Perspective , 1997 .

[13]  Matthew J. Helmers,et al.  Assessment of concentrated flow through riparian buffers , 2002 .

[14]  R. Horton.  The Rôle of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle , 1933 .

[15]  L. D. Meyer,et al.  Sediment-trapping effectiveness of stiff-grass hedges , 1995 .

[16]  Richard Lowrance,et al.  Long-term sediment deposition in the riparian zone of a coastal plain watershed , 1986 .

[17]  Ross B. Leidy,et al.  Chemical movement in relation to tillage system and simulated rainfall intensity , 1995 .

[18]  J. W. Gilliam,et al.  Sediment and Chemical Load Reduction by Grass and Riparian Filters , 1996 .

[19]  Transform your data. , 2008, Nutrition.

[20]  J. Colletti,et al.  Riparian forest buffers in agroecosystems – lessons learned from the Bear Creek Watershed, central Iowa, USA , 2004, Agroforestry Systems.

[21]  Saied Mostaghimi,et al.  Evaluation of vegetative filter strips as a best management practice for feed lots , 1988 .

[22]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[23]  Thomas M. Isenhart,et al.  Ability of Remnant Riparian Forests, With and Without Grass Filters, to Buffer Concentrated Surface Runoff 1 , 2010 .

[24]  Thomas M. Isenhart,et al.  Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer. , 2003 .

[25]  Steven K. Mickelson,et al.  Multispecies riparian buffers trap sediment and nutrients during rainfall simulations. , 2000 .

[26]  R. A. Young,et al.  Predicting Particle-Size Composition of Eroded Soil , 1976 .

[27]  J. W. Gilliam,et al.  Riparian areas as filters for agricultural sediment , 1987 .

[28]  C. Black.  Physical and mineralogical properties, including statistics of measurement and sampling , 1965 .

[29]  M. G. Dosskey,et al.  Filter strip performance and processes for different vegetation, widths, and contaminants , 1999 .

[30]  R. I. Barnhisel,et al.  Filtration of Sediment by Simulated Vegetation II. Unsteady Flow with Non-Homogeneous Sediment , 1979 .

[31]  John C. Hayes,et al.  Filtration of Sediment by Simulated Vegetation I. Steady-State Flow with Homogeneous Sediment , 1979 .