Assessing forecast performance in a cointegrated system

This paper examines the forecast performance of a cointegrated system relative to the forecast performance of a comparable VAR that fails to recognize that the system is characterized by cointegration. The cointegrated system we examine is composed of three vectors, a money demand representation, a Fisher equation, and a risk premium captured by an interest rate differential. The forecasts produced by the vector error correction model (VECM) associated with this system are compared with those obtained from a corresponding differenced vector autoregression, (DVAR) as well as a vector autoregression based upon the levels of the data (LVAR). Forecast evaluation is conducted using both the ‘full-system’ criterion proposed by Clements and Hendry (1993) and by comparing forecast performance for specific variables. Overall our findings suggest that selective forecast performance improvement (especially at long forecast horizons) may be observed by incorporating knowledge of cointegration rank. Our general conclusion is that when the advantage of incorporating cointegration appears, it is generally at longer forecast horizons. This is consistent with the predictions of Engle and Yoo (1987). But we also find, consistent with Clements and Hendry (1995) that relative gain in forecast performance clearly depends upon the chosen data transformation.

[1]  Michael P. Clements,et al.  On the limitations of comparing mean square forecast errors , 1993 .

[2]  Michael Osterwald-Lenum.  A Note with Quantiles of the Asymptotic Distribution of the Maximum Likelihood Cointegration Rank Test Statistics , 1992 .

[3]  P. Perron,et al.  The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock And The Unit Root Hypothesis , 1989 .

[4]  Mark W. Watson,et al.  A SIMPLE ESTIMATOR OF COINTEGRATING VECTORS IN HIGHER ORDER INTEGRATED SYSTEMS , 1993 .

[5]  Joseph G. Altonji,et al.  Using Siblings to Estimate the Effect of School Quality on Wages , 1996 .

[6]  Michael P. Clements,et al.  Forecasting in Cointegrated Systems , 1995 .

[7]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Long-Run Income and Interest Elasticities of Money Demand in the United States , 1989 .

[8]  Mark W. Watson,et al.  Testing for Cointegration When Some of the Cointegrating Vectors are Prespecified , 1995, Econometric Theory.

[9]  S. Johansen,et al.  Testing structural hypotheses in a multivariate cointegration analysis of the PPP and the UIP for UK , 1992 .

[10]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  The Long Run Relationship between Nominal Interest Rates and Inflation: The Fisher Equation Revisited , 1996 .

[11]  Robert H. Rasche,et al.  M1 — Velocity and money-demand functions: Do stable relationships exist? , 1987 .

[12]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  The stability of long-run money demand in five industrial countries , 1995 .

[13]  Søren Johansen,et al.  Cointegration in partial systems and the efficiency of single-equation analysis , 1992 .

[14]  Frederic S. Mishkin.  Is the Fisher Effect for Real? A Reexamination of the Relationship between Inflation and Interest Rates , 1991 .

[15]  Robert F. Engle,et al.  Forecasting and testing in co-integrated systems , 1987 .

[16]  David F. Hendry,et al.  The Demand for M1 in the U.S.A., 1960–1988 , 1992 .

[17]  S. Johansen.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF COINTEGRATION VECTORS , 1988 .

[18]  C. Granger,et al.  Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing , 1987 .