Technological mediation for design collaboration

As the new century opens, work processes have been reengineered, shifting from Tayloristic models of sequential specialization toward work processes that are concurrent and multidisciplinary. This shift in work processes put a premium on design collaborations in which members of project teams go beyond the simple coordination of still individualistic work to engage in joint activity aimed at the co-construction of "collective work products. " In this paper, we outline five basic characteristics emerging from a small but important body of work describing design collaboration. We then go on to suggest why most common collaborative technologies provide poor support for these characteristics, although recent trends are moving in promising directions. We conclude by outlining four criteria which technological mediation for design collaboration must meet in order to effectively support this new kind of work practice. These criteria can assist practitioners in evaluating the ever changing and ever increasing number of collaborative technologies.

[1]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Daniel G. Bobrow,et al.  Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings , 1988, CACM.

[3]  R. Mackay.  Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology , 1987 .

[4]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[5]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Determinants and patterns of control over technology in a computerized meeting room , 1990, CSCW '90.

[6]  Saul Greenberg.  Personalisable Groupware: Accommodating Individual Roles and Group Differences , 1991, ECSCW.

[7]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering , 1991 .

[8]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Supporting Indirect Collaborative Design With Integrated Knowledge-Based Design Environments , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Integration of interpersonal space and shared workspace: ClearBoard design and experiments , 1993, TOIS.

[10]  Geoffrey Bock,et al.  Groupware - software for computer-supported cooperative work , 1992 .

[11]  J. Katzenbach,et al.  The discipline of teams. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[12]  M. Cole.  A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition , 1993 .

[13]  Beth H. Jones,et al.  Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support on Group Perceptions and Performance: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Dispersed Meetings , 1993, MIS Q..

[14]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine , 1993 .

[15]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[16]  Geri Gay,et al.  Use of Communication Resources in a Networked Collaborative Design Environment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Cynthia R. Haller.  Topics in rhetorical invention and technological design: the hermeneutics of software engineering , 1996 .

[18]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  The Structure of Activity During Design Meetings , 1996 .

[19]  G. Olson,et al.  From Laboratories to Collaboratories: A New Organizational Form for Scientific Collaboration , 1997 .

[20]  Rebecca E. Grinter.  Decomposition : ABSTRACT Putting It All Back , 2022 .

[21]  Steve Benford,et al.  Fragmented interaction: establishing mutual orientation in virtual environments , 1998, CSCW '98.

[22]  A.K. Noor,et al.  Beyond Incremental Change , 1998, Computer.

[23]  Christian Heath,et al.  Mobility in collaboration , 1998, CSCW '98.

[24]  Cheryl Geisler,et al.  Going Public: Collaborative Systems Design for Multidisciplinary Conversations , 1999, CoBuild.