Seeking help from weak ties through mediated channels: Integrating self-presentation and norm violation to compliance

Abstract Seeking help from weak ties via information communication technology (ICT) can be challenging. Drawing upon the self-presentation literature and norm violation theory, this study examines how the level of anticipated future interaction (AFI) with weak ties and the choice of channel for seeking help from them --- email, texting, and voicemail --- affect their compliance with these requests. Results from a between-subjects experiment (N = 398) show that self-presentational concern fully mediate the impact of AFI on compliance. Additionally, compared to email and texting, making such requests via voicemail is perceived as less normative, resulting in the reduced likelihood of compliance. These findings provide implications about using ICT to seek social support and promote pro-social acts.

[1]  Effects of Self-Monitoring and Prospect of Future Interaction on Self-Disclosure Reciprocity During the Acquaintance Process , 1987 .

[2]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Help is on the way: patterns of responses to resource requests on facebook , 2014, CSCW.

[3]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Strong, Weak, and Latent Ties and the Impact of New Media , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[4]  P. Wong,et al.  Self-disclosure and relationship development: An attributional analysis. , 1987 .

[5]  M. Leary,et al.  Self-presentation can be hazardous to your health: impression management and health risk. , 1994, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[6]  Kirk W. Duthler.  The Politeness of Requests Made Via Email and Voicemail: Support for the Hyperpersonal Model , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  Altruism and Prosocial Behavior , 2003 .

[8]  Sonja Utz,et al.  Media use in long‐distance friendships , 2007 .

[9]  Golan Shahar,et al.  Strategic self-presentation on Facebook: Personal motives and audience response to online behavior , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Erina L. MacGeorge,et al.  Understanding Advice in Supportive Interactions: Beyond the Facework and Message Evaluation Paradigm. , 2004 .

[11]  Sandra W. DeGrassi,et al.  What you see may not be what you get: relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  V. Yakubovich.  Weak Ties, Information, and Influence: How Workers Find Jobs in a Local Russian Labor Market , 2005 .

[13]  S. Shumaker,et al.  Toward a Theory of Social Support: Closing Conceptual Gaps , 1984 .

[14]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Social capital and resource requests on Facebook , 2014, New Media Soc..

[15]  K. V. Cleemput.  FRIENDSHIP TYPE, CLIQUE FORMATION AND THE EVERYDAY USE OF COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN A PEER GROUP , 2012 .

[16]  Jerome A. Katz,et al.  Gender, self-employment and weak-tie networking through formal organizations , 1997 .

[17]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Namkee Park,et al.  In-Person Contact Begets Calling and Texting: Interpersonal Motives for Cell Phone Use, Face-to-Face Interaction, and Loneliness , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  Robert L. Hertzog,et al.  Ingratiation as a Mediating Factor in Intersex Helping Behavior , 1979 .

[20]  Mira Lee,et al.  The Effect of Online Media Platforms on Joining Causes: The Impression Management Perspective , 2013 .

[21]  Eva A van Reijmersdal,et al.  Social connections and the persuasiveness of viral campaigns in social network sites: Persuasive intent as the underlying mechanism , 2012 .

[22]  M. Wanzer,et al.  An exploratory investigation of the relationship between roommates’ first impressions and subsequent communication patterns , 2004 .

[23]  N. Krause,et al.  Social Relationships in the Church During Late Life: Assessing Differences Between African Americans, Whites, and Mexican Americans , 2011, Review of religious research.

[24]  June Abbas,et al.  Relationships and social rules: Teens' social network and other ICT selection practices , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Transportation Into Narrative Worlds: The Role of Prior Knowledge and Perceived Realism , 2004 .

[26]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  The Mediating Path to a Stronger Citizenship: Online and Offline Networks, Weak Ties, and Civic Engagement , 2011, Commun. Res..

[27]  J. Burgoon.  Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication , 1993 .

[28]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  The Implications of Computer‐Mediated Communication (CMC) for Social Support Message Processing and Outcomes: When and Why Are the Effects of Support Messages Strengthened During CMC? , 2016 .

[29]  Bolanle A. Olaniran,et al.  Group Performance in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication Media , 1994 .

[30]  Kenichi Ishii.  Implications of Mobility: The Uses of Personal Communication Media in Everyday Life , 2006 .

[31]  Laura Stafford,et al.  Social Exchange Theories: Calculating the Rewards and Costs of Personal Relationships , 2008 .

[32]  Barry Wellman,et al.  WHICH TYPES OF TIES AND NETWORKS PROVIDE WHAT KINDS OF SOCIAL SUPPORT , 1991 .

[33]  E. Goffman.  Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[34]  R. Daft,et al.  Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations , 1987 .

[35]  Patrick B. O'Sullivan,et al.  What You Don't Know Won't Hurt Me:Impression Management Functions of Communication Channels in Relationships , 2000 .

[36]  Walid A. Afifi,et al.  Characteristics and Consequences of Expectation Violations in Close Relationships , 1998 .

[37]  R. Baumeister.  A SELF-PRESENTATIONAL VIEW OF SOCIAL PHENOMENA , 1982 .

[38]  Robert A. Bell,et al.  Encouraging Charitable Contributions , 1994 .

[39]  Eva Kahana,et al.  Altruism, Helping, and Volunteering , 2013, Journal of aging and health.

[40]  Brian R. Lashley,et al.  Fishy-looking liars: deception judgment from expectancy violation. , 1992 .

[41]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  M. Millar.  The Effectiveness of the Door-in-the-Face Compliance Strategy on Friends and Strangers , 2002, The Journal of social psychology.

[43]  Clark McCauley,et al.  The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. , 1989 .

[44]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The power of the ask in social media , 2012, CSCW.

[45]  Dmitri Williams,et al.  On and Off the 'Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[46]  Robert B. Cialdini,et al.  Increasing compliance by legitimizing paltry contributions: When even a penny helps. , 1976 .

[47]  Mark S. Granovetter.  T H E S T R E N G T H O F WEAK TIES: A NETWORK THEORY REVISITED , 1983 .

[48]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[49]  Kathy Kellermann,et al.  When Ignorance Is Bliss The Role of Motivation to Reduce Uncertainty in Uncertainty Reduction Theory , 1990 .

[50]  D. Goldsmith,et al.  Communicating Social Support , 2004 .

[51]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength with social media , 2009, CHI.

[52]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Self-Presentation in Online Personals , 2006, Commun. Res..

[53]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Calling All Facebook Friends: Exploring Requests for Help on Facebook , 2013, ICWSM.

[54]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Separating Fact From Fiction: An Examination of Deceptive Self-Presentation in Online Dating Profiles , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[55]  D. Krackhardt.  The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[56]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  Weak-Tie Support Network Preference, Health-Related Stigma, and Health Outcomes in Computer-Mediated Support Groups , 2013 .

[57]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Relational communication, satisfaction, compliance-gaining strategies, and compliance in communication between physicians and patients , 1987 .

[58]  Kaspar Schattke,et al.  Millennials, Social Media, Prosocial Emotions, and Charitable Causes: The Paradox of Gender Differences , 2014 .

[59]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[60]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[61]  M. Leary.  Self-Presentation , 2019 .

[62]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[63]  Katrien Van Cleemput,et al.  “I’ll See You on IM, Text, or Call You”: A Social Network Approach of Adolescents’ Use of Communication Media , 2010 .

[64]  M. Leary.  A Brief Version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale , 1983 .

[65]  Jennifer Marmo,et al.  The rules of Facebook friendship , 2012 .

[66]  John A. Banas,et al.  Norms, expectations, and deception: A norm violation model of veracity judgments , 2000 .

[67]  Linda F. Crowell.  Weak ties: a mechanism for helping women expand their social networks and increase their capital , 2004 .

[68]  Emma L. Slade,et al.  "I like them, but won't 'like' them": An examination of impression management associated with visible political party affiliation on Facebook , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[69]  C. Midden,et al.  Communication Network Influences on Information Diffusion and Persuasion , 1991 .

[70]  Christopher J. Carpenter.  A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of the “But You Are Free” Compliance-Gaining Technique , 2013 .

[71]  Natalya N. Bazarova.  Public Intimacy: Disclosure Interpretation and Social Judgments on Facebook , 2012 .

[72]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  Materialism and Affect: The Role of Self-Presentational Concerns , 2004 .

[73]  Paul Genoni,et al.  The use of the Internet to activate latent ties in scholarly communities , 2005, First Monday.

[74]  Leonard Reinecke,et al.  No place for negative emotions? The effects of message valence, communication channel, and social distance on users' willingness to respond to SNS status updates , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[75]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The quality of online social relationships , 2002, CACM.

[76]  Jeremy P. Birnholtz,et al.  From Ambient to Adaptation: Interpersonal Attention Management Among Young Adults , 2015, MobileHCI.

[77]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Networked: The New Social Operating System , 2012 .

[78]  David A. Flynn.  Seeking peer assistance: Use of e-mail to consult weak and latent ties , 2005 .

[79]  Michael W. Macy,et al.  Structural Learning: Attraction and Conformity in Task-Oriented Groups , 1999, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[80]  Ben L. Marder,et al.  The social media balancing act: Testing the use of a balanced self-presentation strategy for politicians using twitter , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..