Hemispheric local/global processing revisited.

Hemispheric differences for local and global processing were assessed with square and rectangular stimulus shapes which contained either squares or rectangles within them. Experiment 1 manipulated the overall size and area of the stimulus items, while experiment 2 kept stimulus area constant and manipulated the number of shapes inside the stimulus. In different conditions subjects judged whether the inside shapes (local processing) or whether the outside shapes (global processing) were squares or rectangles. Reaction time measures revealed that hemispheric differences were unrelated to the local or global processing requirements as well as the spatial frequency of the stimulus texture. A left hemisphere advantage generally was obtained across stimulus and processing conditions, with the pattern of task effects dependent on the specific stimuli employed. The results suggest that the overall stimulus shape rather than processing mode or specific spatial frequency is a primary determinant of hemispheric differences for visual information.

[1]  B. Julesz.  Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[2]  E. Szelag,et al.  Hemispheric differences in the perception of gratings , 1987 .

[3]  J. Hellige,et al.  Effects of blurring and stimulus size on the lateralized processing of nonverbal stimuli , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  Philip M. Merikle,et al.  Global precedence: the effect of exposure duration , 1984 .

[5]  Maryanne Martin.  Local and global processing: The role of sparsity , 1979 .

[6]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Effects of perceptual quality on the processing of human faces presented to the left and right cerebral hemispheres. , 1984 .

[7]  J Sergent,et al.  The effects of sensory limitations on hemispheric processing. , 1983, Canadian journal of psychology.

[8]  S. Palmer,et al.  Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. , 1982 .

[9]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  The nature of hemispheric specialization in man , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[10]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out” , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Familiarity, Spatial Frequency and Task Determinants in Processing Laterally Presented Representations of Faces , 1985, Cortex.

[12]  D. Navon.  Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  R Kimchi,et al.  Selective attention to global and local levels in the comparison of hierarchical patterns , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  J. Polich,et al.  Hemispheric differences in stimulus identification , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  J Sergent,et al.  Theoretical and methodological consequences of variations in exposure duration in visual laterality studies , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  J. Sergent.  The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  F. Kitterle,et al.  Hemispheric symmetry in contrast and orientation sensitivity , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  J. Polich.  Hemispheric patterns in visual search , 1984, Brain and Cognition.

[19]  J. Hellige,et al.  Effects of stimulus duration on processing lateralized faces , 1985 .

[20]  S. Palmer,et al.  Holistic processes in the perception and transformation of disoriented figures. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J Sergent,et al.  Role of the input in visual hemispheric asymmetries. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  R. A. Kinchla,et al.  Attending to different levels of structure in a visual image , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  S. Christman.  Effects of perceptual quality on hemispheric asymmetries in visible persistence , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Maryanne Martin,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  G. Denes,et al.  Impaired grating discrimination following right hemisphere damage , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  B Julesz,et al.  Experiments in the visual perception of texture. , 1975, Scientific American.

[27]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Backward masking of lateralized faces by noise, pattern, and spatial frequency , 1987, Brain and Cognition.

[28]  D. Boles.  Global versus local processing: Is there a hemispheric dichotomy? , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  T. Hatta.  EFFECTS OF PERCEPTUAL QUALITY AND TASK DIFFERENCE ON THE HEMISPHERIC PROCESSING OF WORD STIMULI , 1986 .

[30]  M. Bryden.  Measuring handedness with questionnaires , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  J E Hoffman,et al.  Interaction between global and local levels of a form. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  J. Polich,et al.  Hemispheric differences for visual evoked potentials from checkerboard stimuli , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Jeff Miller.  Global precedence in attention and decision. , 1981 .

[34]  J. Wilding,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Matching Stroop-Type Letter Stimuli , 1982, Cortex.

[35]  J. Baird,et al.  Global precedence in visual pattern recognition , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  J R Antes,et al.  Gobal-local precedence in picture processing , 1984, Psychological research.

[37]  I. Rentschler,et al.  Features versus spatial phase in a tachistoscopic laterality experiment , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  J. Hellige,et al.  Lateralized effects of blurring: A test of the visual spatial frequency model of cerebral hemisphere asymmetry , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  J. Polich,et al.  Hemispheric differences for feature detection , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Right hemisphere superiority for initial stages of letter processing , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  L M Ward,et al.  Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Y. Kuroiwa,et al.  Amplitude difference between pattern‐evoked potentials after left and right hemifield stimulation in normal subjects , 1987, Neurology.

[43]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Role of input factors in visual-field asymmetries , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[44]  David Navon.  Do attention and decision follow perception Comment on Miller. , 1981 .

[45]  L C Boer,et al.  Global precedence as a postperceptual effect: An analysis of speed-accuracy tradeoff functions , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  R. Klein,et al.  Perceptual salience of form versus material as a function of variations in spacing and number of elements , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[47]  J. Sergent,et al.  Role of task factors in visual field asymmetries , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[48]  Global precedence in attended and nonattended objects. , 1988 .

[49]  J. R. Pomerantz.  Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  J Sergent.  Influence of task and input factors on hemispheric involvement in face processing. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  G R Grice,et al.  Forest before trees? It depends where you look , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Feature similarity and laterality effects in visual masking , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  R Kimchi,et al.  Separability and integrality of global and local levels of hierarchical patterns. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  J. Polich,et al.  Hemispheric differences for feature perception , 1988, Psychological research.