LOWER LIMITS ON APERTURE SIZE FOR AN EXOEARTH DETECTING CORONAGRAPHIC MISSION

The yield of Earth-like planets will likely be a primary science metric for future space-based missions that will drive telescope aperture size. Maximizing the exoEarth candidate yield is therefore critical to minimizing the required aperture. Here we describe a method for exoEarth candidate yield maximization that simultaneously optimizes, for the first time, the targets chosen for observation, the number of visits to each target, the delay time between visits, and the exposure time of every observation. This code calculates both the detection time and multi-wavelength spectral characterization time required for planets. We also refine the astrophysical assumptions used as inputs to these calculations, relying on published estimates of planetary occurrence rates as well as theoretical and observational constraints on terrestrial planet sizes and classical habitable zones. Given these astrophysical assumptions, optimistic telescope and instrument assumptions, and our new completeness code that produces the highest yields to date, we suggest lower limits on the aperture size required to detect and characterize a statistically-motivated sample of exoEarths.

[1]  Stuart Bowyer,et al.  The 1997 reference of diffuse night sky brightness , 1998 .

[2]  Robert A. Brown Single-Visit Photometric and Obscurational Completeness , 2005, astro-ph/0503077.

[3]  N. Jeremy Kasdin,et al.  Linear and bayesian planet detection algorithms for the Terrestrial planet finder , 2006 .

[4]  Stuart B. Shaklan,et al.  The lighter side of TPF-C: evaluating the scientific gain from a smaller mission concept , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[5]  Andrew Cumming,et al.  The Keck Planet Search: Detectability and the Minimum Mass and Orbital Period Distribution of Extrasolar Planets , 2008, 0803.3357.

[6]  Remi Soummer,et al.  NEW COMPLETENESS METHODS FOR ESTIMATING EXOPLANET DISCOVERIES BY DIRECT DETECTION , 2010 .

[7]  N. J. Kasdin,et al.  Analyzing the Designs of Planet-Finding Missions , 2009, 0903.4915.

[8]  Drake Deming,et al.  Earth as an extrasolar planet: Earth model validation using EPOXI earth observations. , 2011, Astrobiology.

[9]  D. Ciardi,et al.  The exoplanet eccentricity distribution from Kepler planet candidates , 2012, 1203.1631.

[10]  Zhaohuan Zhu,et al.  FAST RISE OF “NEPTUNE-SIZE” PLANETS (4–8 R⊕) FROM P ∼ 10 TO ∼250 DAYS—STATISTICS OF KEPLER PLANET CANDIDATES UP TO ∼0.75 AU , 2012, 1212.4853.

[11]  M. R. Haas,et al.  PLANET OCCURRENCE WITHIN 0.25 AU OF SOLAR-TYPE STARS FROM KEPLER , 2011, 1103.2541.

[12]  Aki Roberge,et al.  The Search for Habitable Worlds. 1. The Viability of a Starshade Mission , 2012 .

[13]  G. Marcy,et al.  A PLATEAU IN THE PLANET POPULATION BELOW TWICE THE SIZE OF EARTH , 2013, 1304.0460.

[14]  G. Marcy,et al.  Prevalence of Earth-size Planets Orbiting Sun-like Stars , 2015, 1510.03902.

[15]  Ryan C. Terrien,et al.  HABITABLE ZONES AROUND MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS: NEW ESTIMATES , 2013, 1301.6674.

[16]  Luis Marchen,et al.  The AFTA coronagraph instrument , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[17]  Timothy D. Brandt,et al.  Prospects for detecting oxygen, water, and chlorophyll on an exo-Earth , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  R. Soummer,et al.  APODIZED PUPIL LYOT CORONAGRAPHS FOR ARBITRARY APERTURES. IV. REDUCED INNER WORKING ANGLE AND INCREASED ROBUSTNESS TO LOW-ORDER ABERRATIONS , 2014, 1412.2751.

[19]  William C. Danchi,et al.  CONSTRAINING THE EXOZODIACAL LUMINOSITY FUNCTION OF MAIN-SEQUENCE STARS: COMPLETE RESULTS FROM THE KECK NULLER MID-INFRARED SURVEYS , 2014 .

[20]  G. Marcy,et al.  THE MASS–RADIUS RELATION FOR 65 EXOPLANETS SMALLER THAN 4 EARTH RADII , 2013, 1312.0936.

[21]  Ari Silburt,et al.  A STATISTICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE PLANET POPULATION AROUND KEPLER SOLAR-TYPE STARS , 2014, 1406.6048.

[22]  D. Hogg,et al.  EXOPLANET POPULATION INFERENCE AND THE ABUNDANCE OF EARTH ANALOGS FROM NOISY, INCOMPLETE CATALOGS , 2014, 1406.3020.