Weed diversity and weed management

The story of agriculture is the story of weed interference. After millennia of weed control we still have weeds. This situation has led many growers to observe that “the weeds always win.” One of the most important reasons weeds are so successful is their biodiversity. Biodiversity is an inevitable consequence of the struggle an individual weed species undergoes in the presence of neighbors, and by occupying a physical space in an agroecosystem. Weeds have evolved in response to cropping system practices by adapting and occupying niches left available in agroecosystems. Forces created by our cropping practices over evolutionary time have led to the weed diversity we observe today. Diversity underlies weed management in several important ways. A plant experiences diversity among its neighbors in at least five different ways. Weeds have adapted to selection in agroecosystems in several ways: (1) genetic variants within a species; (2) somatic polymorphism of plant parts; (3) success in diverse habitat microsites; (4) temporal adaptations within the community; and (5) floristic diversity of a community at higher levels than the species. Herein, weed diversity is discussed in this broader context, in terms of population behaviors that emerge as a consequence of the activities of individual components at lower levels of organization. Diversity is also discussed in terms of its implications for weed management. The potential exists to develop management strategies based on differences in weed and crop diversity. These strategies might be developed by characterization of weedy genetic and phenotypic diversity; enhancement of crop, cropping system, and agroecosystem diversity; and characterization of the spatial distribution of weed populations.

[1]  J. Dekker,et al.  Pleiotropy in Triazine-Resistant Brassica napus: Ontogenetic and Diurnal Influences on Photosynthesis. , 1992, Plant physiology.

[2]  J. Rominger Taxonomy of Setaria (Gramineae) in North America , 1962 .

[3]  M. L. Roush,et al.  Future Outlook for Herbicide-Resistance Research , 1990, Weed Technology.

[4]  J. Gosselink,et al.  Diurnal Rhythm of Sensitivity of Cotton Seedlings to Herbicides , 1967, Science.

[5]  J. Wendel,et al.  Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp. II. Genetic diversity and population genetic structure in S. glauca, S. geniculata, and S. faberii (Poaceae). , 1995 .

[6]  S. Duke,et al.  Ultrastructural alterations to chloroplasts in triazine-resistant weed biotypes , 1984 .

[7]  C. M. Karssen,et al.  Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp. IV. Changes in the germinative capacity of S. faberii (poaceae) embryos with development from anthesis to after abscission , 1996 .

[8]  Alex Martin,et al.  The Stability of Weed Seedling Population Models and Parameters in Eastern Nebraska Corn (Zea mays) and Soybean (Glycine max) Fields , 1995, Weed Science.

[9]  J. Dekker Weedy adaptation in Setaria spp.: I. Isozyme analysis of the genetic diversity and population genetic structure in S. viridis , 1995 .

[10]  R. N. Andersen,et al.  Response of Velvetleaf (Abutilon theoprasti) to Bentazon as Affected by Leaf Orientation , 1978, Weed Science.

[11]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Regulation of Photosynthesis in Triazine-Resistant and -Susceptible Brassica napus. , 1992, Plant physiology.

[12]  B. Grodzinski,et al.  SEED GERMINATION AND SEEDLING GROWTH CHARACTERISTICS OF ATRAZINE-SUSCEPTIBLE AND RESISTANT BIOTYPES OF Brassica campestris , 1982 .

[13]  H. Darmency,et al.  Agronomic performance of a triazine resistant foxtail millet (Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.) , 1989 .

[14]  R. A. Masters,et al.  Comparison of Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms in Chloroplast DNA of Five Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia spp.) Accessions , 1992, Weed Science.

[15]  T. W. Jurik,et al.  Competition for light between velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and soybean (Glycine max) , 1990 .

[16]  Robert N. Andersen,et al.  Rhythmic Leaf Movements of Some Common Weeds , 1979, Weed Science.

[17]  Rong-Lin Wang,et al.  Weedy Adaptation in Setaria Spp.: III. Variation in Herbicide Resistance in Setaria Spp , 1995 .

[18]  B. K. Thompson,et al.  Life history and allozyme variation in populations of the weed species Setaria faberi , 1987 .

[19]  K. A. Hibberd,et al.  Herbicide Resistance in Plants , 2020 .

[20]  T. W. Jurik,et al.  A replacement series evaluation of competition between velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and soybean (Glycine max) , 1991 .

[21]  J. T. Williams,et al.  SEED POLYMORPHISM AND GERMINATION. , 1965 .

[22]  J. Harper Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[23]  J. M. Thurston Morphological and physiological variation in wild oats (Avena fatua L. and A. ludoviciana Dur.) and in hybrids between wild and cultivated oats , 1957, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[24]  J. Dekker,et al.  Interference between velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) II. Population dynamics , 1983 .

[25]  P. Pillai,et al.  Lipid composition of chloroplast membranes from weed biotypes differentially sensitive to triazine herbicides. , 1981, Plant physiology.

[26]  J. Andresen Weeds of the North Central States. , 1956 .

[27]  J. Dekker,et al.  Interference between velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) I. Growth , 1983 .

[28]  J. Wendel,et al.  WEEDY ADAPTATION IN SETARIA SPP. I: ISOZYME ANALYSIS OF GENETIC DIVERSITY AND POPULATION GENETIC STRUCTURE IN SETARIA VIRIDIS , 1995 .