Cardiac CT in the Preoperative Diagnostics of Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease: Radiation Dose Optimization by Omitting Test Bolus or Bolus Tracking.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Congenital heart diseases (CHD) belong to the leading causes of infant mortality worldwide. Prognostic improvements result from multimodal therapy strategies leading to an increased demand for noninvasive imaging. The aim of the study was to further optimize cardiac CT radiation dose by omitting the test bolus or bolus tracking scan, which can have a relevant share of radiation exposure, especially in neonates. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 25 neonates with CHD who received a CT angiography (CTA) from 2009 to 2018. The examinations were performed as a high-pitch CTA (pitch 3.4, 80 kV) with manual contrast administration (1.5 ml/kg body weight) and fixed scan delay depending on the respective heart defect. Diagnosis, adverse events, radiation dose parameters, objective (contrast-to-noise ratio) and subjective (4-point Likert scale) image quality as well as diagnostic accuracy compared to intraoperative findings was assessed. RESULTS All examinations were diagnostically evaluable without adverse events. The median CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) was 0.50 mGy (range, 0.15-0.94), the median dose-length product was 8 mGy × cm (range, 3-17). The estimation of the effective dose by Monte Carlo simulation revealed lower median dose levels 0.66 mSv (range, 0.25-1.40 mSv) than previously published in comparable groups. All examinations achieved a very good mean image quality score of 1.2 ± 0.4 with only minimal image noise and mean contrast-to-noise ratio of 16.1 ± 7.0. Diagnostic accuracy was 100 % as cardiac anatomy revealed no new diagnoses or significant differences in the subsequent cardiac surgery. CONCLUSION Cardiac high-pitch CTA of neonates with CHD can be performed safely and dose-reducing without additional test bolus or bolus tracking scan. With very good image quality, it provides a detailed insight into the cardiac anatomy and thus enables a differentiated, noninvasive therapy planning.

[1]  Michelle Noga,et al.  Cumulative Radiation Exposure in Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Disease , 2015, Pediatric Cardiology.

[2]  F. Chan MR and CT imaging of the pediatric patient with structural heart disease. , 2009, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Pediatric cardiac surgery annual.

[3]  W. Kalender,et al.  Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. , 2010, Radiology.

[4]  J. Lesser,et al.  Non-sedated, free breathing cardiac CT for evaluation of complex congenital heart disease in neonates. , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[5]  J. Roos‐Hesselink,et al.  Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  E. Nickoloff,et al.  Current adult and pediatric CT doses , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[7]  R. Krishnamurthy,et al.  CT angiography of neonates and infants: comparison of radiation dose and image quality of target mode prospectively ECG-gated 320-MDCT and ungated helical 64-MDCT. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  A. Taylor,et al.  Introduction to cardiac imaging in infants and children: techniques, potential, and role in the imaging work-up of various cardiac malformations and other pediatric heart conditions. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[9]  R. Krishnamurthy Neonatal cardiac imaging , 2010, Pediatric Radiology.

[10]  Werner Jaschke,et al.  Radiation dose reduction by using 100-kV tube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[11]  Judith Rankin,et al.  20-year survival of children born with congenital anomalies: a population-based study , 2010, The Lancet.

[12]  A. Ganguly,et al.  Comparison of different methods of calculating CT radiation effective dose in children. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Contrast medium application in pediatric high-pitch cardiovascular CT angiography: manual or power injection? , 2014, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[14]  W. Huda,et al.  Effective Radiation Dose in Computed Tomographic Angiography of the Chest and Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization in Pediatric Patients , 2013, Pediatric Cardiology.

[15]  A. Einstein,et al.  Radiation Safety in Children With Congenital and Acquired Heart Disease , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[16]  Hopewell N. Ntsinjana,et al.  The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[17]  Vivek Muthurangu,et al.  Congenital heart disease and multi-modality imaging. , 2010, Heart, lung & circulation.

[18]  Francesca Raimondi,et al.  Computed tomography imaging in children with congenital heart disease: Indications and radiation dose optimization. , 2016, Archives of cardiovascular diseases.

[19]  A. Taylor,et al.  Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[20]  W. Huda,et al.  ECG-Synchronized CT Angiography in 324 Consecutive Pediatric Patients: Spectrum of Indications and Trends in Radiation Dose , 2015, Pediatric Cardiology.